Typological perspectives on second language acquisition: 'Thinking for speaking' in L2;Perspectives typologiques sur l'acquisition d'une langue seconde 'Penser pour Parler' en L2

LIA Language, Interaction and Acquisition

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 163-172

  Benazzo, Sandra ^a   Flecken, Monique ^b   Soroli, Efstathia ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 8   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ TOULOUSE JEAN JAURÈS   (France)

^c Department of Language and Communication ^*  (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872159592     PISSN: 18797865     EISSN: 18797873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/lia.3.2.01int     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Allen, S., Ozyurek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Furman, R. & Ishizuka, T. (2007). Language-specific and universal influences in children's syntactic packaging of manner and path: A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition 102, 16-48.
2. Berman, R. & Slobin, D. (1994). Relating events in narrative. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Bowerman, M. & Choi, S. (2001). Shaping meanings for language: universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories. In M. Bowerman & S. Levinson (eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (475-511). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Brown, A. & Gullberg, M. (2011). Bidirectional crosslinguistic influence in event conceptualization? Expressions of path among Japanese learners of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(1), 79-94.
5. Carroll, M. & Lambert, M. (2006). Reorganizing principles of information structure in advanced L2s: a study of French and German learners of English. In H. Byrnes, H. Weger-Guntharp, & K. Sprang (eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities (54-73). Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
6. Choi, S. (2011). Language-specificity of motion event expressions in young Korean children. Language Interaction Acquisition 2(1), 157-184.
7. Choi, S. & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition 41(1-3), 83-121.
8. Cook, V. J. & Bassetti, B. (eds.) (2011). Language and bilingual cognition. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
9. Dimroth, C., Andorno, C., Benazzo, S. & Verhagen, J. (2010). Given claims about new topics. How Romance and Germanic speakers link changed and maintained information in narrative discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 42(12), 3328-3344.
10. Han, Z. & Cadierno, T. (2010). Linguistic relativity in SLA: thinking for speaking. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
11. Hendriks, H., Hickmann, M. & Demagny, A. C. (2008). How English native speakers learn to express caused motion in English and French. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère 27, 15-41.
12. Hickmann, M., Hendriks, H. & Champaud, C. (2009). Motion in French child language: typological constraints on its emergence and development. In J. Guo et al. (eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language (307-330). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Hickmann, M., Taranne, P. & Bonnet, Ph. (2009). Motion in first language acquisition: Manner and path in French and in English. Journal of Child Language 36(4), 705-741.
14. Hickmann M. (2006). The relativity of motion in first language acquisition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (eds.), Space across languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (281-308). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
15. Jarvis, S. & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. London: Routledge.
16. Klein, W. & Stutterheim C. von (2002). Quaestio and L-perspectivation. In C. F. Graumann & W. Kallmeyer (eds.), Perspective and perspectivation in discourse (59-88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
17. Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
18. Odlin, T. (2005). Crosslinguistic influence and conceptual transfert: What are the concepts? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 25, 3-25.
19. Papafragou, A., Massey, C. & Gleitman, L. (2002). Shake, rattle, 'n' roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition 84, 189-219.
20. Pavlenko, A. (2011). Thinking and speaking in two languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
21. Slobin, D. (1996). From "thought and language" to "thinking for speaking". In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (70-96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Slobin, D. (2006). What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistics typology, discourse and cognition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (59-81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
23. von Stutterheim, C. (2003). Linguistic structure and information organisation: the case of very advanced learners. In S. Foster-Cohen (ed.), EUROSLA Yearbook 3 (183-206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24. von Stutterheim, C. & Carroll, M. (2006). The impact of grammatical temporal categories on ultimate attainment in L2 learning. In H. Byrnes, H. Weger-Guntharp & K. Sprang (eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities (40-53). Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
25. von Stutterheim, C., Carroll, M. & Klein, W. (2009). New perspectives in analyzing aspectual distinctions across languages. In W. Klein & P. Li (eds.), The expression of time (195-216). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.