Comparisons of protein profiles of beech bark disease resistant and susceptible American beech (Fagus grandifolia)

Proteome Science

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Mason, Mary E ^a   Koch, Jennifer L ^b   Krasowski, Marek ^c   Loo, Judy ^d,e  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Northern Research Station   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

^d LAURENTIAN FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

^e BIOVERSITY INTERNATIONAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Beech bark disease; Beech scale; Cryptococcus; Disease resistance; Fagus; Insect resistance; Neonectria

Indexed keywords

VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BEECH; BEECH BARK DISEASE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENATURING GRADIENT GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; DISEASE RESISTANCE; FAGUS GRANDIFOLIA; ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; PLANT DISEASE; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; WESTERN HEMISPHERE;

FAGUS; FAGUS GRANDIFOLIA; FUNGI; HEMIPTERA; HEXAPODA; NEONECTRIA;

EID: 84872138403     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14775956     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1477-5956-11-2     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Ehrlich J. The beech bark disease of Fagus, following crytococcus fagi (Baer.). Can J Res 1934, 10:593-692.
2. Houston DR. Major new tree disease epidemics: beech bark disease. Ann R Phytopathol 1994, 32:75-87.
3. Miller-Weeks M. Current status of beech bark disease in New England and New York. Proceedings, IUFRO beech bark disease working party conference: Sept 26-Oct 8, 1982; Hamden CT. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-37 1983, 21-23. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Houston DR, Wainehouse E.
4. Houston DR. American beech resistance to Cryptococcus fagisuga. Proceedings, IUFRO beech bark disease working party conference: Sept 26-Oct 8, 1982; Hamden CT. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-37 1983, 38-41. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Houston DR, Wainehouse E.
5. Koch JL, Carey DW, Mason ME, Nelson CD. Assessment of beech scale resistance in full- and half-sibling American beech families. Can J For Res 2010, 40:265-272.
6. Mackenzie M. Observations of the beech bark disease complex on the national forests of Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Proceedings of the 53rd western international forest disease work conference. Aug. 26-29, 2005 2006, 31-38. Ogden, UT: Compiled by Guyon, J. US Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, Jackson WY.
7. Garnas JR, Houston DR, Ayres MP, Evans C. Disease ontogeny overshadows effect of climate and species interactions on population dynamics in a non-native forest disease complex. Ecography 2012, 35:412-421.
8. Kasson MT, Livingston WH. Relationships among beech bark disease climate, radial growth response and mortality of American beech in northern Maine USA. Forest Pathology 2012, 42:199-212.
9. Cale JA, Letkowski SK, Teale SA, Castello JD. Beech bark disease: an evaluation of the predisposition hypothesis in an aftermath forest. Forest Pathology 2012, 42:52-56.
10. Koch JL. Beech bark disease: the oldest " new" threat to American beech in the united states. Outlooks on Pest Management 2010, 21:64-68.
11. Heyd R. Managing beech bark disease in Michigan. Beech bark disease: proceedings of the beech bark disease symposium. June 16-18, 2004; Saranac lake NY. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-33 2005, 128-132. Newtown Square, PA: USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Evans CA, Jucas JA, Twery MJ.
12. Leak WB, Gove JH. Growth of northern hardwoods in New England: a 25-year update. North J Appl For 2008, 25:103-105.
13. US forest service, Allegheny national forest http://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb5044088.pdf.
14. State of Michigan, department of natural resources http://fhm.fs.fed.us/fhh/fhh_11/MI_FHH_2011.pdf.
15. Wargo PM. Amino nitrogen and Phenolic constituents of bark of American beech, Fagus grandifolia, and infestation by beech scale Cryptococcus fagisuga. Eur J For Path 1988, 18:279-290.
16. Ramirez M, Loo J, Krasowski M. Evaluation of genetic resistance to the beech scale insect (Cryptococcus fagisuga) and propagation of American beech (Fagus grandifolia) by grafting. Silvae Genet 2007, 56:163-169.
17. Li L, Steffens JC. Over-expression of polyphenol oxidase in transgenic tomato plants results in enhanced bacterial disease resistance. Planta 2002, 215:239-247. 10.1007/s00425-002-0750-4, 12029473.
18. Thipyapong P, Hunt MD, Steffens JC. Antisense down-regulation of polyphenol oxidase results in enhanced disease susceptibility. Plant 2004, 220:105-117.
19. Ramiro DA, Guerreiro-Filho O, Mazzafera P. Phenol contents, oxidase activities, and the resistance of coffee to the leaf miner Leucoptera caffeella. J Chem Ecol 2006, 32:1977-1988. 10.1007/s10886-006-9122-z, 16906360.
20. Bustos DM, Bustamante CA, Iglesias AA. Involvement of non-phosphorylating glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in response to oxidative stress. J Plant Physiol 2008, 165:451-461.
21. Baek D, Jin Y, Jeong JC, Lee H, Moon H, Lee J, Shin D, Kang CH, Kim DH, Nam J, Lee SY, Yun D. Suppression of reactive oxygen species by glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Phytochemistry 2008, 69:333-338. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.07.027, 17854848.
22. Hancock JT, Henson D, Nyirenda M, Desikan R, Harrison J, Lewis M, Hughes J, Neill SJ. Proteomic identification of glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as an inhibitory target of hydrogen peroxide in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol Biochem 2005, 43:828-835. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2005.07.012, 16289945.
23. Collins RM, Afzal M, Ward DA, Prescott MC, Sait SM, Rees HH, Tomsett AB. Differential proteome analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana genotypes exhibiting resistance or susceptibility to the insect herbivore Plutella xylostella. PLoS One 2010, 5:1-14.
24. Monstyrskaya K, Babiychuk EB, Draeger A. The annexins: spatial and temporal coordination of signaling events during cellular stress. Cell Mol Life Sci 2009, 66:2623-2642. 10.1007/s00018-009-0027-1, 19381436.
25. Mortimer JC, Laohavisit A, Macpherson N, Webb A, Brownlee C, Battey NH, Davies JM. Annexins: multifunctional components of growth and adaptation. J Exp Bot 2008, 59:533-544. 10.1093/jxb/erm344, 18267940.
26. Konupka-Postupolska D, Clark G, Goch G, Debski J, Floras K, Canero A, Fijolek B, Roux S, Hennig J. The role of annexin 1 in drought stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2009, 150:1394-1410. 10.1104/pp.109.135228, 2705051, 19482919.
27. Montrichard F, Alkhalfioui F, Yano J, Vensel WH, Hurkman WJ, Buchanan BB. Thioredoxin targets in plants: the first 30 years. J Proteomics 2009, 72:45-474.
28. Lalo C, Mestres-Ortega D, Marco Y, Meyer Y, Reichheld J. The Arabidopsis cytosolic thioredoxin h5 gene induction by oxidative stress and its W-box-mediated response to pathogen elicitor. Plant Physiol 2004, 134:1006-1016. 10.1104/pp.103.035782, 389923, 14976236.
29. Park SK, Jung YJ, Lee JR, Lee YM, Jang HH, Lee SS, Park JH, Kim SY, Moon JC, Lee SY, Chae HB, Shin MR, Jung JH, Kim MG, Kim WY, Yun D, Lee KO, Lee SY. Heat-shock and redox-dependent functional switching of an h-type Arabidopsis thioredoxin from a disulfide Reductase to a molecular chaperone. Plant Physiol 2009, 150:552-561. 10.1104/pp.109.135426, 2689952, 19339505.
30. Traverso JA, Vignols F, Cazalis R, Pulido A, Sahrawy M, Cejudo FJ, Meyer JC, Chueca A. PsTRXh1 And PsTRXh2 are both pea h-type thioredoxins with antagonistic behavior in redox imbalances. Plant Physiol 2007, 143:300-311. 1761970, 17098852.
31. Close TJ. Dehydrins: emergence of a biochemical role for a family of plant dehydration proteins. Physiol Plant 1996, 97:795-803.
32. Rorat T. Plant dehydrins - tissue localization, structure and function. Cell mol biol ltrs 2006, 11:536-556.
33. Ventelon-Debout M, Delalande F, Brizard J, Diemer H, Dorsselaer AV, Brugidou C. Proteome analysis of cultivar-specific deregulations of Oryza sativa indica and O. sativa cellular suspensions undergoing rice yellow mottle virus infection. Proteomics 2004, 4:216-225. 10.1002/pmic.200300502, 14730683.
34. Gang DR, Kasahara H, Zia Z, Mijnsbrugge KV, Bauw G, Boerjan W, Montagus MV, Davin LB, Lewis NG. Evolution of plant defense mechanisms. J Biol Chem 1999, 11:7516-7527.
35. Manosalvo PM, Davidson RM, Liu B, Zhu X, Hulbert SH, Leung H, Leach JE. A germin-like protein gene family functions as a complex quantitative trait locus conferring broad-spectrum disease resistance in rice. Plant Physiol 2009, 149:286-296. 10.1104/pp.108.128348, 2613727, 19011003.
36. Zhou S, Sauve R, Thannhauser TW. Proteome changes induced by aluminium stress in tomato roots. J Exp Botany 2009, 6:1849-1857.
37. Uzarowska A, Dionisio G, Sarholz B, Piepho H, Xu M, Ingvardsen CR, Wenzel G, Lubberstedt T. Validation of candidate genes putatively associated with resistance to SCMV and MDMV in maize (Zea mays L.) by expression profiling. BMC Plant Biol 2009, 9:15-30. 10.1186/1471-2229-9-15, 2669481, 19187556.
38. Soares NC, Francisco R, Vielba JM, Ricardo CP, Jackson PA. Associating wound-related changes in the apoplast proteome of Medicago with early steps in the ROS signal-transduction pathway. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:2298-2309. 10.1021/pr8009353, 19245219.
39. Park C, An J, Shin Y, Kim K, Lee B, Pack K. Molecular characterization of pepper germin-like protein as the novel PR-16 family of pathogenesis-related proteins isolated during the resistance response to viral and bacterial infection. Planta 2004, 219:797-806.
40. Mitchell SF, Lorsch JR. Should I stay or should I go? eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1 and 1A control start codon recognition. J BiolChem 2008, 283:27345-27349.
41. Raussell A, Kanhonou R, Yenush L, Serrano R. The translation initiation factor eIR1A is an important determinant in the tolerance to NaCl stress in yeast and plants. Plant J 2003, 34:257-267. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01719.x, 12713533.
42. Scmidt F, Marnef A, Cheung M, Wilson I, Hancock J, Staiger D, Ladomery M. A proteomic analysis of oligo(dT)-bound mRNP containing oxidative stress-induced Arabidpopsis thaliana RNA-binding proteins ATGRP7 and ATGRP8. Mol Biol Rep 2010, 37:839-845. 10.1007/s11033-009-9636-x, 19672695.
43. Lee M, Kim LP, Kim B, Hahn J, Hong CB. Flooding stress-induced Glycine-rich RNA-binding protein from Nicotiana tabacum. Mol Cells 2009, 27:47-54. 10.1007/s10059-009-0004-4, 19214433.
44. Rospert S, Dubaquie Y, Gautschi M. Nascent-polypeptide-associated complex. Cell Mol Life Sci 2002, 59:1632-1639. 10.1007/PL00012490, 12475173.
45. Yan S, Tang Z, Su W, Sun W. Proteomic analysis of salt stress-responsive proteins in rice root. Proteomics 2005, 5:235-244. 10.1002/pmic.200400853, 15672456.
46. Hakkanen A, Kokko H, Buchala A, Hayrinen J, Karenlampi S. Benzothiadiazole affects the leaf proteome in arctic bramble (Rubus arcticus). Mol Plant Pathol 2008, 9:799-808. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00502.x, 19019008.
47. Lee Y, Lee H, Lee J, Kim S, Kim S. Hormone- and light-regulated nucleoctyoplasmic transport in plants: current status. J Exp Bot 2008, 59:3229-3245. 10.1093/jxb/ern200, 18678754.
48. Subramanian B, Bansa VK, Kav NNV. Proteome-level investigation of Brassica carinata-derived resistance to leptosphaeria maculans. J Agric Food Chem 2005, 53:313-324. 10.1021/jf048922z, 15656667.
49. He H, Li J. Proteomic analysis of phosphoproteins regulated by abscisic acid in rice leaves. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 2008, 371:883-888. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.05.001, 18468508.
50. Kushwaha HR, Singh AK, Sopry SK, Singla-Pareek S, Pareek A. Genome wide expression analysis of CBS domain containing proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana(L.) heynh and Oryza sativa L. Reveals their developmental and stress regulation. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:200. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-200, 2694836, 19400948.
51. Abril N, Gion JM, Kerner R, Muller-Starck G, Navarro Cerrillo RM, Plomion C, Renaut J, Valledor L, Jorrin-Novo JV. Proteomics research on forest trees, the most recalcitrant and orphan plant species. Phytochemistry 2011, 72:1219-1242. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.01.005, 21353265.
52. Koch JL, Carey DW. Controlled cross-pollinations with American beech trees that are resistant to beech bark disease. Proceedings, 14th central hardwood forest conference: march 16-19, 2004; Wooster OH. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-316 1984, 358-364. Newtown Square, PA: USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Yaussy DA, Hix DM, Long RP, Geobel PG.
53. Koch JL, Carey DW, Mason ME. Use of microsatellite markers in an American beech (Fagus grandifolia) population and paternity testing. Silvae Genet 2009, 9:62-68.
54. Bahrman N, Zivy M, Damerval C, Baradat P. Organisation o f the variability of abundant proteins in seven geographical origins of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Theor Appl Genet 1994, 88:407-411.
55. Kunkel BN, Brooks DM. Crosstalk between signalling pathways in pathogen defense. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2002, 5:325-331. 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00275-3, 12179966.
56. Zhang E, Chen Z, Liang X. Resolubilization of TCA precipitated plant proteins for 2-D electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 2011, 32:696-698. 10.1002/elps.201000557, 21425171.
57. Zhu Y, Zhao P, Wu X, Wang W, Scali M, Cresti M. Proteomic identification of differentially expressed proteins in mature and germinated maize pollen. Acta Physio Plant 2011, 33:1467-1474.
58. Zhao F, Fang W, Xie D, Zhao Y, Tang Z, Li W, Nie L, Lv S. Proteomic identification of differentially expressed proteins in Gossypium thurberi inoculated with cotton Verticulum dahliae. Plant Sci 2012, 185-186:176-184.
59. Mohammadi PP, Moieni A, Hiraga S, Komatsu S. Organ-specific proteomic analysis of drought-stressed soybean seedlings. J Proteomics 2012, 75:1906-1923. 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.12.041, 22245419.
60. Bai S, Willard B, Chapin LJ, Kinter MT, Francis DM, Stead AD, Jones ML. Proteomic analysis of pollination-induced corolla senescence in petunia. J Exp Bot 2010, 61:1089-1109. 10.1093/jxb/erp373, 2826652, 20110265.
61. Kerner R, Winkler JB, Dupuy JW, Jurgensen M, Lindermayr C, Ernst D, Muller-Starck G. Changes in the proteome of juvenile European beech following three years exposure to free-air ozone. iForest 2011, 4:69-76.
62. Pawlowski TA. Proteomics of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seed dormancy breaking: influence of abscisic and gibberellic acids. Proteomics 2007, 7:2246-2257. 10.1002/pmic.200600912, 17533642.
63. Valcu C, Junqueira M, Shevchenko A, Schlink K. Comparative proteomic analysis of responses to pathogen infection and wounding in Fagus sylvatica. J Prot Res 2009, 8:4077-4091.
64. Morrin RS, Liebhold AM, Luzader ER, Lister AJ, Gottschalk KW, Twardus DB. Mapping host-species abundance of three major exotic forest pests. Res. Pap. NE-726 2005, 11. Newtown Square, PA: USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station.
65. Koch JL, Carey DW. The genetics of resistance of American beech to beech bark disease: knowledge through 2004. Beech bark disease: proceedings of the beech bark disease symposium. June 16-18, 2004; Saranac lake NY. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-331 2005, 98-105. Newtown Square, PA: USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Evans CA, Jucas JA, Twery MJ.
66. Bona E, Marsano F, Cavaletto M, Berta G. Proteomic characterization of copper stress response in Cannabis sativa roots. Proteomics 2007, 7:1121-1130. 10.1002/pmic.200600712, 17352425.
67. Quackenbush J. Microarray normalization and transformation. Nat Genet 2002, 32(Suppl):496-501.
68. 18 The R project website http://www.r-project.org.
69. Storey JD. Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rate: a unified approach. J R Statist Soc B 2004, 1:187-205.
70. Gutstein HB, Morris JS. Laser capture sampling and analytical issues in proteomics. Exp Rev Proteomics 2007, 4:627-637.
71. Perkins DN, Pappin DJC, Creasy DM, Cottrell JS. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999, 20:3551-3567. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19991201)20:18<3551::AID-ELPS3551>3.0.CO;2-2, 10612281.
72. The Fagaceae genomic project website http://www.fagaceae.org.
73. Altshcul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nuc Acids Res 1997, 25:3389-3402.
74. Vizcaino JA, Cote R, Reisinger F, Barnes H, Foster JM, Rameseder J, Hermjakob H, Martens L. The proteomics identifications database: 2010 update. Nuc Acids Res 2010, 38:D736-D742.
75. The pride database website http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride.
76. Barsnes H, Vizcaino JA, Eidhammer I, Martens L. PRIDE converter: making proteomics data-sharing easy. Nat Biotechnol 2007, 27:598-599.
77. The pride converter website http://code.google/p/pride-converter.