Isolated upper pole access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A large-scale analysis from the CROES percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study

Journal of Urology

Volumn 189, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 568-573

  Tefekli, Ahmet ^a   Esen, Tarik ^b   Olbert, Peter J ^c   Tolley, David ^d   Nadler, Robert B ^e   Sun, Ying Hao ^f   Duvdevani, Mordechai ^g   De La Rosette, Jean J M C H ^h  

^a AMERICAN HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

^b KOÇ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MARBURG   (Germany)

^d WESTERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f SECOND MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^g HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^h ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

calculi; kidney; nephrostomy, percutaneous; urolithiasis; urologic surgical procedures

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDROTHORAX; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISOLATED LOWER POLE ACCESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; ISOLATED UPPER POLE ACCESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; KIDNEY CALYX; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHROLITHIASIS; OPERATION DURATION; PELVIS INJURY; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; PERFORATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STAGHORN STONE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY CALCULI; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84872131720     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: 15273792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.035     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. G. Bandi, S.L. Best, S.Y. Nakada Current practice patterns in the management of upper urinary tract calculi in the north central United States J Endourol 22 2008 631
2. J.N. Armitage, S.O. Irving, N.A. Burgess Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the United Kingdom: results of a prospective data registry British Association of Urological Surgeons, Section of Endourology Eur Urol 61 2012 1188
3. J. de la Rosette, D. Assimos, M. Desai The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients CROES PCNL Study Group J Endourol 25 2011 11
4. A.Y. Muslumanoglu, A. Tefekli, M.A. Karadag Impact of percutaneous access point number and location on complication and success rates in percutaneous nephrolithotomy Urol Int 77 2006 340
5. A. Skolarikos, M. Binbay, A. Bisas Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidneys: factors affecting stone-free rate J Urol 186 2011 1894
6. M. Lezrek, K. Bazine, K. Moufid A more "conventional" way to perform percutaneous endopyeloplasty: a feasibility study Urology 79 2012 227
7. R.N. Pedro, N.R. Netto Upper-pole access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy J Endourol 23 2009 1645
8. M. McAllister, K. Lim, R. Torrey Intercostal vessels and nerves are at risk for injury during supracostal percutaneous nephrostolithotomy J Urol 185 2011 329
9. A. Tefekli, M. Ali Karadag, K. Tepeler Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified Clavien grading system: looking for a standard Eur Urol 53 2008 184
10. M. Desai, A. De Lisa, B. Turna The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones J Endourol 25 2011 1263
11. C. Wong, R.J. Leveillee Single upper-pole percutaneous access for treatment of > or = 5-cm complex branched staghorn calculi: is shockwave lithotripsy necessary? J Endourol 16 2002 477
12. G.M. Preminger, D.G. Assimos, J.E. Lingeman Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations AUA Nephrolithiasis Guideline Panel J Urol 173 2005 1991
13. M. Aron, R. Goel, P.K. Kesarwani Upper pole access for complex lower pole renal calculi BJU Int 94 2004 849
14. E.N. Liatsikos, R. Kapoor, B. Lee 'Angular percutaneous renal access' Multiple tracts through a single incision for staghorn calculous treatment in a single session Eur Urol 48 2005 832
15. A.A. Ray, D.G. Chung, R.J. Honey Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone and prone-flexed positions: anatomic considerations J Endourol 23 2009 1607
16. B. Duty, N. Waingankar, Z. Okhunov Anatomical variation between the prone, supine, and supine oblique positions on computed tomography: implications for percutaneous nephrolithotomy access Urology 79 2012 67
17. J.G. Valdivia, R.M. Scarpa, M. Duvdevani Supine versus prone position during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a report from the clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study J Endourol 25 2011 1619
18. I.G. Jeong, T. Kang, J.K. Bang Association between metabolic syndrome and the presence of kidney stones in a screened population Am J Kidney Dis 58 2011 383
19. A. Tefekli, H. Kurtoglu, K. Tepeler Does the metabolic syndrome or its components affect the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J Endourol 22 2008 35
20. B. Lojanapiwat, S. Prasopsuk Upper-pole access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of supracostal and infracostal approaches J Endourol 20 2006 491
21. C.S. Ng, B.R. Herts, S.B. Streem Percutaneous access to upper pole renal stones: role of prone 3-dimensional computerized tomography in inspiratory and expiratory phases J Urol 173 2005 124
22. S.C. Kim, J.C. Ng, B.R. Matlaga Use of lower pole nephrostomy drainage following endorenal surgery through an upper pole access J Urol 175 2006 580
23. C.M. Scoffone, C.M. Cracco, M. Cossu Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new standard for percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Eur Urol 54 2008 1393