Three lignocellulose features that distinctively affect biomass enzymatic digestibility under NaOH and H2SO4 pretreatments in Miscanthus

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 130, Issue , 2013, Pages 30-37

  Zhang, Wei ^a,b   Yi, Zili ^b   Huang, Jiangfeng ^a,b   Li, Fengcheng ^a,b   Hao, Bo ^a,b   Li, Ming ^a,b   Hong, Shufen ^a,b   Lv, Yezi ^b   Sun, Wei ^a,b   Ragauskas, Arthur ^c   Hu, Fan ^c   Peng, Junhua ^d   Peng, Liangcai ^a,b  

^a Huazhong Agricultural University   (China)

^b HUNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d Wuhan Institute of Botany Chinese Academy of Sciences   (China)

Author keywords

Biomass enzymatic digestibility; Crystallinity index (CrI); Degree of polymerization (DP); Miscanthus; Mole number (MN)

Indexed keywords

BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; CRYSTALLINE MATERIALS; FACTOR ANALYSIS; GENETIC ENGINEERING; LIGNIN; POLYMERIZATION; SACCHARIFICATION;

CRYSTALLINITY INDEX; DEGREE OF POLYMERIZATION; ENZYMATIC DIGESTIBILITY; MISCANTHUS; MOLE NUMBER (MN);

CELLULOSE;

CELLULOSE; LIGNOCELLULOSE; SODIUM HYDROXIDE; SULFURIC ACID;

BIOENERGY; BIOMASS; CELLULOSE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHEMICAL PROPERTY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRYSTALLINITY; DIGESTIBILITY; ENERGY CROP; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GRASS; HYDROXIDE; LIGNIN; POLYMERIZATION; SODIUM; SULFURIC ACID;

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; BIOMASS; CELL WALL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTALLINITY; FRACTIONATION; GRASS; MISCANTHUS; MOLE NUMBER; NONHUMAN; PLANT CELL; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHARIFICATION;

BIOMASS; CELLULOSE; ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GRASSES; LIGNINS; POLYMERIZATION; SACCHARIFICATION;

MISCANTHUS;

EID: 84872126464     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.029     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Arioli T., Peng L., Betzner A.S., Burn J., Wittke W., Herth W., Camilleri C., Höfte H., Plazinski J., Birch R., Cork A., Glover J., Redmond J., Williamson R.E. Molecular analysis of cellulose biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Science 1998, 279:717-720.
2. Bansal P., Hall M., Realff M.J., Lee J.H., Bommarius A.S. Multivariate statistical analysis of X-ray data from cellulose: a new method to determine degree of crystallinity and predict hydrolysis rates. Bioresource Technology 2010, 101:4461-4471.
3. Chang V.S., Holtzapple M.T. Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2000, 84-86:5-37.
4. Dische Z. Color reactions of carbohydrates. Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry 1962, vol. 1:477-512. Academic Press, New York.
5. Fry S.C. The growing plant cell wall: chemical and metabolic analysis 1988, Longman, London, pp. 95-97.
6. Haigler C.H. The function and biogenesis of native cellulose. Cellulose Chemistry and its Applications 1987, 30-83. Horwood, Chichester. Nevell, Zeronion (Eds.).
7. Park J.Y., Kang M., Kim J.S., Lee J.P., Choi W.I., Lee J.S. Enhancement of enzymatic digestibility of Eucalyptus grandis pretreated by NaOH catalyzed steam explosion. Bioresource Technology 2012, 123:707-712.
8. Hallac B.B., Ragauskas A.J. Analyzing cellulose degree of polymerization and its relevancy to cellulosic ethanol. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 2011, 5:215-225.
9. Himmel M.E., Ding S.-Y., Johnson D.K., Adney W.S., Nimlos M.R., Brady J.W., Foust T.D. Biomass recalcitrance engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 2007, 315:804-807.
10. Hu Z., Foston M., Ragauskas A.J. Comparative studies on hydrothermal pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of leaves and internodes of alamo switchgrass. Bioresource Technology 2011, 102:7224-7228.
11. Huang J.F., Xia T., Li A., Yu B., Li Q., Tu Y.Y., Zhang W., Yi Z.L., Peng L.C. A rapid and consistent near infrared spectroscopic assay for biomass enzymatic digestibility upon various physical and chemical pretreatments in Miscanthus. Bioresource Technology 2012, 121:274-281.
12. Kokubo A., Sakurai N., Kuraishi S., Takeda K. Culm brittleness of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) mutants is caused by smaller number of cellulose molecules in cell wall. Plant Physiology 1991, 97:509-514.
13. Kumar R., Mago G., Balan V., Wymand C.E. Physical and chemical characterizations of corn stover and poplar solids resulting from leading pre-treatment technologies. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100:3948-3962.
14. Kumar V., Kothari S.H. Effect of compressional force on the crystallinity of directly compressible cellulose excipients. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 1999, 177:173-182.
15. Laureano-Perez L., Teymouri F., Alizadeh H., Dale E.B. Understanding factors that limit enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass characterization of pretreated corn stover. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2005, 121-124:1081-1099.
16. Lewandowski I., Scurlock J.M.O., Lindvall E., Christou M. The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the USA and Europe. Biomass Bioenergy 2003, 25:335-361.
17. Mohnen D., Bar-Peled M., Somerville C. Cell wall polysaccharide synthesis. Biomass Recalcitrance. Deconstructing the Plant Cell Wall for Bioenergy 2008, 94-159. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford. M.E. Himmel (Ed.).
18. Pan X., Xie D., Yu R.W., Saddler J.N. The bioconversion of mountain pine beetle-killed lodgepole pine to fuel ethanol using the organosolv process. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2008, 1:39-48.
19. Park S., Baker J.O., Himmel M.E., Parilla P.A., Johnson D.K. Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnology for Biofuels 2010, 3:10.
20. Peng L., Hocart C.H., Redmond J.W., Williamson R.E. Fractionation of carbohydrates in Arabidopsis root cell walls shows that three radial swelling loci are specifically involved in cellulose production. Planta 2000, 211:406-414.
21. Puri V.P. Effect of crystallinity and degree of polymerization of cellulose on enzymatic saccharification. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 1984, 26:1219-1222.
22. Ragauskas A.J., Williams C.K., Davison B.H., Britovsek G., Cairney J., Eckert C.A., Frederick W.J., Hallett J.P., Leak D.J., Liotta C.L., Mielenz J.R., Murphy R., Templer R., Tschaplinski T. The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science 2006, 311:484-489.
23. Reddy N., Yang Y. Biofibers from agricultural byproducts for industrial applications. Trends in Biotechnology 2005, 23:22-27.
24. Segal L., Creely J.J., Martin A.E., Conrad C.M. An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-Ray diffractometer. Textile Research Journal 1959, 29:786-794.
25. Sinitsyn A.P., Gusakov A.V., Vlasenko E.Y. Effect of structural and physico-chemical features of cellulosic substrates on the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 1991, 30:43-59.
26. USP, 2002. 25/NF 20 (United States Pharmacopeia 25/National Formulary 20). (2010) 456 Washington, DC, pp. 701.
27. Xie G., Peng L. Genetic engineering of energy crops: a strategy for biofuel production in china free access. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 2011, 53:143-150.
28. Xie, G., Yang, B., Xu, Z., Li, F., Guo, K., Zhang, M., Wang, L., Zou, W., Wang, Y., Peng, L., 2012. Globe identification of multiple OsGH9 family genes and their involvement in cellulose crystallinity modification in rice. PLoS ONE, in press.
29. 4 pretreatments in Miscanthus. Biotechnology for Biofuels 2012, 5:58.
30. Yang B., Dai Z., Ding S.-Y., Wyman C.E. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic biomass. Biofuels 2011, 2:421-450.
31. Zhang Y.H., Lynd L.R. Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2004, 88:797-824.
32. Zhu L., O'Dwyer J.P., Chang V.S., Granda C.B., Holtzapple M.T. Structural features affecting biomass enzymatic digestibility. Bioresource Technology 2008, 99:3817-3828.