Temporal variation and scale in movement-based resource selection functions

Statistical Methodology

Volumn 17, Issue C, 2014, Pages 82-98

  Hooten, M B ^a,b   Hanks, E M ^b   Johnson, D S ^c   Alldredge, M W ^d  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

^c NOAA National Marine Mammal Laboratory   (United States)

^d Colorado Parks and Wildlife ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Animal movement; Kullback Leibler; Telemetry data

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872090203     PISSN: 15723127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.stamet.2012.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aarts G., Fieberg J., Matthiopoulos J. Comparative interpretation of count, presence-absence and point methods for species distribution models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2012, 3:177-187.
2. Akaike H. On the likelihood of a time series model. The Statistician 1978, 27:217-235.
3. Akaike H. Statistical inference and measurement of entropy. Scientific Inference, Data Analysis, and Robustness 1983, Academic Press. G.E.P. Box, T. Leonard, C.-F. Wu (Eds.).
4. Beier P. Dispersal of juvenile cougars in fragmented habitat. The Journal of Wildlife Management 1995, 59:228-237.
5. Belden R.C., Hagedorn B.W. Feasibility of translocating panthers into Northern Florida. The Journal of Wildlife Management 1993, 57:388-397.
6. Boyce M.S. Scale and resource selection functions. Diversity and Distributions 2006, 12:269-276.
7. Brillinger D.R., Preisler H.K., Ager A.A., Kie J.G., Stewart B.S. Employing stochastic differential equations to model wildlife motion. Bulletin of the Brazilian Mathematical Association 2002, 33:385-408.
8. Buckland S.T., Burnham K.P., Augustin N.H. Model selection: an integral part of inference. Biometrics 1997, 53:603-618.
9. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference 2002, Springer-Verlag. second ed.
10. Cressie N.A.C. Statistics for Spatial Data 1993, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
11. Dickson G.B., Beier P. Home-range and habitat selection by adult cougars in Southern California. The Journal of Wildlife Management 2002, 66:1235-1245.
12. R.M. Dorazio, Predicting the geographic distribution of a species using background data and presence-only records, Biometrics (2012), in press (). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01779.x.
13. Fieberg J. Kernel density estimators of home range: smoothing and the autocorrelation red herring. Ecology 2007, 88:1059-1066.
14. Forester J.D., Im H.K., Rathouz P.J. Accounting for animal movement in estimation of resource selection functions: sampling and data analysis. Ecology 2009, 90:3554-3565.
15. Garlick M.J., Powell J.A., Hooten M.B., McFarlane L. Homogenization of large-scale movement models in ecology. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 2011, 73:2088-2108.
16. Gasparrini A., Armstrong B., Kenward M.G. Multivariate meta-analysis for non-linear and other multi-parameter association. Statistics in Medicine 2012, 31:3821-3839.
17. Hanks E.M., Hooten M.B., Johnson D.S., Sterling J. Velocity based movement modeling for individual and population level inference. PLOS One 2011, 6(8):e22795.
18. Hoeting J.A., Madigan D., Raftery A.E., Volinsky C.T. Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial. Statistical Science 1999, 14:382-417.
19. Hooten M.B., Johnson D.S., Hanks E.M., Lowry J.H. Agent-based inference for animal movement and selection. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 2010, 15:523-538.
20. Jaynes E.T. Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physics Review 1957, 106:620-630.
21. Johnson D.H. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 1980, 61:65-71.
22. Johnson D.S., London J.M., Lea M.-A., Durban J.W. Continuous-time correlated random walk model for animal telemetry data. Ecology 2008, 89:1208-1215.
23. Johnson C.J., Nielson S.E., Merrill E.H., McDonald T.L., Boyce M.S. Resource selection functions based on use-availability data: theoretical motivation and evaluation methods. The Journal of Wildlife Management 2006, 70:347-357.
24. Johnson D.S., Thomas D.L., Ver Hoef J.M., Christ A. A general framework for the analysis of animal resource selection from telemetry data. Biometrics 2008, 64:968-976.
25. Jonsen I.D., Flemming J.M., Myers R.A. Robust state-space modeling of animal movement data. Ecology 2005, 86:2874-2880.
26. Kass R.E., Raftery A.E. Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1995, 90:773-795.
27. Keating K.A., Cherry S. Use and interpretation of logistic regression in habitat-selection studies. The Journal of Wildlife Management 2004, 68:774-789.
28. Kertson B., Spencer R., Marzluff J., Hepinstall-Cymerman J., Grue C. Cougar space use and movements in the Wildland-Urban landscape of Western Washington. Ecological Applications 2011, 8:2866-2881.
29. Lele S.R. A new method for estimation of resouce selection probability function. The Journal of Wildlife Management 2009, 73:122-127.
30. Lele S.R., Keim J.L. Weighted distributions and estimation of resource selection probability functions. Ecology 2006, 87:3021-3028.
31. MacKay D.J.C. Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms 2003, Cambridge University Press.
32. Manly B.F.J., McDonald L.L., Thomas D.L., McDonald T.L., Erickson W.P. Resource Selection by Animals 2002, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
33. McClintock B.T., King R., Thomas L., Matthiopoulos J., McConnell B.J., Morales J.M. A general modeling framework for animal movement and migration using multi-state random walks. Ecological Monographs 2012, 82:335-349.
34. Millspaugh J.J., Nielson R.M., McDonald L.L., Marzluff J.M., Gitzen R.A., Rittenhouse C.D., Hubbard M.W., Sheriff S.L. Analysis of resource selection using utilization distributions. The Journal of Wildlife Management 2006, 70:384-395.
35. Nielson R.M., Manly B.F.J., McDonald L.L., Sawyer H., McDonald T.L. Estimating habitat selection when GPS fix success is less than 100%. Ecology 2009, 90:2956-2962.
36. Ordeñana M.A., Crooks K.R., Boydston E.E., Fisher R.N., Lyren L.M., Siudyla S., Haas C.D., Harris S., Hathaway S.A., Turschak G.M., et al. Effects of urbanization on carnivore species distribution and richness. Journal of Mammalogy 2010, 91:1322-1331.
37. Orlando A.M. Impacts of Rural Development On Puma Ecology in California's Sierra Nevada 2008, ProQuest.
38. Otis D.L., White G.C. Autocorrelation of location estimates and the analysis of radiotracking data. The Journal of Wildlife Management 1999, 63:1039-1044.
39. Papouchis C.M. Conserving moutain lions in a changing landscape. People and Predators: From Conflict to Coexistence 2004, Island Press.
40. Patil G.P., Rao C.R. Weighted distributions and size-biased sampling with applications to wildlife populations and human families. Biometrics 1978, 34:179-189.
41. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2012, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, URL: http://www.R-project.org.
42. Schick R.S., Loarie S.R., Colchero F., Best B.D., Boustany A., Conde D.A., Halpin P.N., Joppa L.N., McClellan C.M., Clark J.S. Understanding movement data and movement processes: current and emerging directions. Ecology Letters 2008, 11:1338-1350.
43. Shumway R.H., Stoffer D.S. Time Series Analysis and Its Applications 2006, Springer.
44. Sweanor L.L., Logan K.A., Hornocker M.G. Cougar dispersal patterns, metapopulation dynamics, and conservation. Conservation Biology 2000, 14:798-808.
45. Swihart R.K., Slade N.A. Testing for independence of observations in animal movements. Ecology 1985, 66:1176-1184.
46. Swihart R.K., Slade N.A. On testing for independence in animal movements. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 1997, 2:48-63.
47. Turchin P. Quantitative Analysis of Movement 1998, Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers, Sundeland.
48. Van Dyke F.G., Brocke R.H., Shaw H.G., Ackerman B.B., Hemker T.P., Lindzey F.G. Reactions of mountain lions to logging and human activity. The Journal of Wildlife Management 1986, 50:95-102.
49. Ward G., Hastie T., Barry S., Elith J., Leathwick J.R. Presence-only data and the EM algorithm. Biometrics 2009, 65:554-563.
50. Warton D.I., Shepherd L.C. Poisson point process models solve the pseudo-absence problem for presence-only data in ecology. The Annals of Applied Statistics 2010, 4:1383-1402.
51. Wikle C.K., Hooten M.B. A general science-based framework for nonlinear spatio-temporal dynamical models. Test 2010, 19:417-451.
52. Wilson R.R., Hooten M.B., Strobel B.N., Shivik J.A. Accounting for individuals, uncertainty, and multi-scale clustering in core area estimation. The Journal of Wildlife Management 2010, 74:1343-1352.