The Impact of anonymous and assigned use of student response systems on student achievement

Journal of Interactive Learning Research

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 101-112

  Poole, Dawn ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872082146     PISSN: 1093023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Achievements: A reputation built on solid performance ( n.d.). Retrieved from California State University, Stanislaus website: http://www.csustan.edu/ aboutus/achievements.html
2. Blood, E. & Neel, R. ( 2008). Using student response systems in lecture-based instruction: Does it change student engagement and learning? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16( 3), 375-383.
3. Boatright-Horowitz, S. L. ( 2009). Useful pedagogies or financial hardships? Interactive response technology (clickers) in the large college classroom. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 27( 3), 295-298. Retrieved from http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/articleView.cfm?id= 588
4. Bruff, D. ( 2009). Teaching with classroom response systems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5. California State University, Stanislaus 2008-2009 Fact Book (n.d.). Retrieved from California State University, Stanislaus, Office of Institutional Research website: http://www.csustan.edu/IR/Pages/documents/FACTBOOK2008-2009- FINALforIRWebsite.pdf
6. Coreos, E. & Monty, V. ( 2008). Interactivity in library presentations using a personal response system. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 2, 53-60.
7. Crossgrove, K. & Curran, K. ( 2008). Using clickers in nonmajors- and majorslevel biology courses: Student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material. Life Sciences Education, 7, 146-154. doir:10.1187/ cbe.07-08-006
8. Hill, G. W., Smith, R. A., & Horn, M. ( 2004). U sing Technology to Increase Student Interest, Motivation, and (Perhaps) Learning. July, Delivered at the American Psychological Association Conference. Retrieved from http:// www.smartroom.com/KSUAPA.pdf
9. Hoekstra, A. ( 2008). Vibrant student voices: Exploring effects of the use of clickers in large college courses. Learning, Media and Technology, 33( 4), 329-341.
10. Kaleta, R. & Joosten, T. ( 2006). "Clickers" in the Classroom: Analyses from the University of Wisconsin System Project. EDUCAUSE 2006, Dallas, TX. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ EDU06283.pdf
11. King, D. B. & Joshi, S. ( 2008). Gender differences in the use and effectiveness of personal response devices. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 544-552. doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9121-7
12. Koenig, K. ( 2010). Building acceptance for pedagogical reform through widescale implementation of clickers. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39( 3), 46-50.
13. Kolikant, Y. B., Drane, D., & Calkins, S. ( 2010). "Clickers" as catalysts for transformation of teachers. College Teaching, 58, 127-135. doi: 10.1080/87567551003774894
14. Langman, J. & Fies, C. ( 2010). Classroom response system: Mediated science learning with English Language learners. Language and Education, 24( 2), 81-99.
15. Martyn, M. ( 2007). Clickers in the classroom: An active learning approach. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 2, 71-74.
16. Mayer, R. E., Stull, A. LeLeeuw, K., Almeroth, K., Bimber, B., Chun, D., Bulger, M., Campbell, J., Knight, A., & Zhang, H. ( 2009). Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 51-57.
17. Mollborn, S. & Hoekstra, A. ( 2010). "A Meeting of Minds": Using clickers for critical thinking in large sociology classes. Teaching Sociology, 38, 18-27. doi: 10.1177/0092055X09353890
18. Morling, B., McAuliffe, M., Cohen, L., & DiLorenzo, T. M. ( 2008). Efficacy of personal response systems ("clickers") in large, introductory psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 45-50. doi : 10.1080/00986280701818516
19. Mun, W. K. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. ( 2009). The impact of the use of response pad system on the learning of secondary school physics concepts: A Singapore quasi-experiment study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40( 5), 848-860. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00868.X