Quantitative Dynamics of Telomere Bouquet Formation

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2012, Pages

  Richards, David M ^a   Greer, Emma ^a   Martin, Azahara C ^a   Moore, Graham ^a   Shaw, Peter J ^a   Howard, Martin ^a  

^a JOHN INNES CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOMES;

CHROMOSOMAL PAIRING; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; CHROMOSOME PAIRS; FORMATION DYNAMICS; HOMOLOGOUS CHROMOSOMES; NUCLEAR ENVELOPE; NUCLEAR MEMBRANES; QUANTITATIVE DYNAMICS; TELOMERES; WILD TYPES;

CELL MEMBRANES;

VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ANTHER; ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CHROMOSOMAL LOCALIZATION; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; DNA REPLICATION; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; GENE CLUSTER; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE LOCUS; HYBRID; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PAIRING HOMEOLOGOUS 1 GENE; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLANT GENE; PLANT GENOME; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RYE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SISTER CHROMATID; TELOMERE; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; WILD TYPE;

SECALE CEREALE; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 84872011645     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002812     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bhalla N, Dernburg AF, (2008) Prelude to a Division. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 24: 397-424.
2. Moore G, Shaw P, (2009) Improving the chances of finding the right partner. Curr Opin Genet Dev 19: 99-104.
3. Zickler D, Kleckner N, (1998) The leptotene-zygotene transition of meiosis. Annu Rev Genet 32: 619-97.
4. Scherthan H, (2001) A bouquet makes ends meet. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2: 621-627.
5. Scherthan H, (2007) Telomere attachment and clustering during meiosis. Cell Mol Life Sci 64: 117-124.
6. Harper L, Golubovskaya I, Cande WZ, (2004) A bouquet of chromosomes. J Cell Biol 117: 4025-4032.
7. Prieto P, Shaw P, Moore G, (2004) Homologue recognition during meiosis is associated with a change in chromatin conformation. Nat Cell Biol 6: 906-908.
8. Carlton PM, Cande WZ, (2002) Telomeres act autonomously in maize to organize the meiotic bouquet from a semipolarized chromosome orientation. J Cell Biol 157: 231-242.
9. Sheehan MJ, Pawlowski WP, (2009) Live imaging of rapid chromosome movements in meiotic prophase I in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 20989-20994.
10. Hiraoka Y, Dernburg AF, (2009) The SUN Rises on Meiotic Chromosome Dynamics. Dev Cell 17: 598-605.
11. Dorninger D, Karigl G, Loidl J, (1995) Simulation of chromosomal homology searching in meiotic pairing. J Theor Biol 176: 247-260.
12. Penfold CA, Brown PE, Lawrence ND, Goldman AS, (2012) Modeling meiotic chromosomes indicates a size dependent contribution of telomere clustering and chromosome rigidity to homologue juxtaposition. PLoS Comput Biol 8 (5):: e1002496.
13. Fritsche M, Reinholdt LG, Lessard M, Handel MA, Bewersdorf J, et al. (2012) The Impact of Entropy on the Spatial Organization of Synaptonemal Complexes within the Cell Nucleus. PLoS One 7 (5):: e36282.
14. Carlton PM, Cowan CR, Cande WZ, (2003) Directed motion of telomeres in the formation of the meiotic bouquet revealed by time course and simulation analysis. Mol Biol Cell 14: 2832-2843.
15. Martinez-Perez E, Shaw P, Aragon-Alcaide L, Moore G, (2003) Chromosomes form into seven groups in hexaploid and tetraploid wheat as a prelude to meiosis. Plant J 36: 21-39.
16. Greer E, Martin AC, Pendle A, Colas I, Jones AME, et al. (2012) The Ph1 locus suppresses Cdk2-type activity during premeiosis and meiosis in wheat. Plant Cell 24: 152-162.
17. Dhaliwal HS, Gill BS, Waines JG, (1977) Analysis of induced homoeologous pairing in a ph mutant wheat×rye hybrid. J Hered 68: 206-209.
18. Able JA, Langridge P, (2006) Wild sex in the grasses. Trends Plant Sci 11: 261-263.
19. Tornoe CW, Christensen C, Meldal M, (2002) Peptidotriazoles on solid phase: [1,2,3]-triazoles by regionspecific copper(I)-catalized 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions of terminal alkynes to azides. J Org Chem 67: 3057-3064.
20. Gehlen LR, Rosa A, Klenin K, Langowski J, Gasser SM, et al. (2006) Spatially confined polymer chains: implications of chromatin fibre flexibility and peripheral anchoring on telomere-telomere interaction. J Phys Condens Matter 18: S245.
21. Brillinger DR, (1997) A Particle Migrating Randomly on a Sphere. J Theor Probab 10: 429-443.
22. Shamina NV, (2005) Formation of division spindles in higher plant meiosis. Cell Biol Int 29: 307-318.
23. Cowan CR, Carlton PM, Cande WZ, (2002) Reorganization and polarization of the meiotic bouquet-stage cell can be uncoupled from telomere clustering. J Cell Sci 115: 3757-66.
24. Verbrugge S, van den Wildenberg SM, Peterman EJ, (2009) Novel ways to determine kinesin-1's run length and randomness using fluorescence microscopy. Biophys J 97: 2287-2294.
25. Armstrong SJ, Franklin FC, Jones GH, (2001) Nucleolus-associated telomere clustering and pairing precede meiotic chromosome synapsis in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Cell Sci 114: 4207-4217.
26. Phillips CM, Wong C, Bhalla N, Carlton PM, Weiser P, et al. (2005) HIM-8 binds to the X chromosome pairing center and mediates chromosome-specific meiotic synapsis. Cell 123: 1051-1063.
27. Penkner A, Tang L, Novatchkova M, Ladurner M, Fridkin A, et al. (2007) The nuclear envelope protein Matefin/SUN-1 is required for homologous pairing in C. elegans meiosis. Dev Cell 12: 873-885.
28. Sato A, Isaac B, Phillips CM, Rillo R, Carlton PM, et al. (2009) Cytoskeletal forces span the nuclear envelope to coordinate meiotic chromosome pairing and synapsis. Cell 139: 907-919.
29. Golubovskaya IN, Harper LC, Pawlowski WP, Schichnes D, Cande WZ, (2002) The pam1 Gene Is Required for Meiotic Bouquet Formation and Efficient Homologous Synapsis in Maize (Zea mays L.). Genetics 162: 1979-1993.
30. Cowan CR, Cande WZ, (2002) Meiotic telomere clustering is inhibited by colchicine but does not require cytoplasmic microtubules. J Cell Sci 115: 3747-56.
31. Hubner MR, Spector DL, (2010) Chromatin dynamics. Annu Rev Biophys 39: 471-489.
32. Marshall WF, Straight A, Marko JF, Swedlow J, Dernburg A, et al. (1997) Interphase chromosomes undergo constrained diffusional motion in living cells. Curr Biol 7: 930-939.
33. Vazquez J, Belmont AS, Sedat JW, (2001) Multiple regimes of constrained chromosome motion are regulated in the interphase Drosophila nucleus. Curr Biol 11: 1227-1239.
34. Viera A, Rufas JS, Martínez I, Barbero JL, Ortego S, et al. (2009) CDK2 is required for proper homologous pairing, recombination and sex-body formation during male mouse meiosis. J Cell Sci 122: 2149-2159.
35. Tiang C-L, He Y, Pawlowski W, (2012) Chromosome organization and dynamics during interphase, mitosis, and meiosis in plants. Plant Physiol 158: 26-34.
36. Sears ER, (1977) An induced mutant with homoeologous pairing in common wheat. Can J Genet Cytol 19: 585-593.
37. Prieto P, Moore G, Shaw P, (2007) Fluorescence in situ hybridization on vibratome sections of plant tissues. Nat Protoc 2: 1831-1838.
38. Schwarzacher T, Heslop-Harrison JS (2000) Practical in situ hybridization. Oxford: BIOS Scientific Publishers. 250p.
39. Colas I, Shaw P, Prieto P, Wanous M, Spielmeyer W, et al. (2008) Effective chromosome pairing requires chromatin remodeling at the onset of meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 6075-6080.
40. Cox AV, Bennett ST, Parokonny AS, Kenton A, Callimassia MA, et al. (1993) Comparison of plant telomere locations using a PCR-generated synthetic probe. Ann Bot 72: 239-247.