Viewpoint: Conference-journal hybrids

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 44-49

  Grudin, Jonathan ^a   Mark, Gloria ^b   Riedl, John ^c  

^a MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS;

COMPUTER SCIENCE;

EID: 84872007732     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: 15577317     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/2398356.2398371     Document Type: Review

References (6)

1. Anderson, T. Conference reviewing considered harmful. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review 43, 2 (2009), 108-116.
2. Blockeel, H., Kersting, K., Nijssen, S. and Zelezný, F. A revised publication model for ECMl PKdd. Computing research repository, 2012; http://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.6324v1.pdf
3. Feldmann, A. Experiences from the sIGCOMM 2005 European shadow PC experiment. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 35, 3 (2005), 97-102; http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1070889
4. Grudin, J. technology, conferences, and community. Commun. ACM 54, 2, (Feb. 2011), 41-43.
5. Isaacs, R. Report on the 2007 sOsP shadow program committee. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 42, 3 (2008), 127-131; http://dl.acm.org/citation. cfm?id=1368524.
6. Patterson, D., Snyder, L., and Ullman, J. Evaluating computer scientists and engineers for promotion and tenure. Computing Research News (sept. 1999), a-b.