Testing a peer support intervention for people with type 2 diabetes: A pilot for a randomised controlled trial

BMC Family Practice

Volumn 14, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Simmons, David ^a   Cohn, Simon ^b   Bunn, Christopher ^a   Birch, Kym ^a   Donald, Sarah ^a   Paddison, Charlotte ^b   Ward, Candice ^a   Robins, Peter ^a   Prevost, A Toby ^c   Graffy, Jonathan ^b  

^a CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Complex intervention; Diabetes; Peer support; Self management

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PEER GROUP; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CARE; SELF HELP; SOCIAL SUPPORT; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT SELECTION; PEER GROUP; PILOT PROJECTS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CARE; SELF-HELP GROUPS; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84871975330     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712296     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-5     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. The Evidence Base for Diabetes Care Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England, Williams R, Herman W, Kinmonth A-L, Wareham NJ, 2002
2. IDF Clinical Guidelines Task Force, Global guideline for Type 2 diabetes International Diabetes Federation, Brussels 2005
3. International Diabetes Federation, World Diabetes Atlas 2005 International Diabetes Federation, Brussels 2005
4. Barriers to care in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: the Michigan experience. Hiss RG, Ann Intern Med 1996 124 146 148 8554207 (Pubitemid 26011612)
5. Personal barriers to diabetes care: lessons from a multiethnic community in New Zealand. Simmons D, Weblemoe T, Voyle J, Prichard A, Leakehe L, Gatland B, Diabet Med 1998 15 958 964 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(1998110)15:11<958::AID- DIA687>3.0.CO;2-9 9827851 (Pubitemid 28500250)
6. Discordance in perceptions of barriers to diabetes care between patients, primary care and secondary care. Simmons D, Lillis S, Swan J, Haar J, Diabetes Care 2007 30 490 495 10.2337/dc06-2338 17327310 (Pubitemid 46354323)
7. Psychosocial problems and barriers to improved diabetes management: results of the Cross-National Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) Study. Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Lauritzen T, Snoek FJ, Matthews DR, Skovlund SE, International DAWN Advisory Panel, Diab Med 2005 22 1379 1385 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01644.x (Pubitemid 41391315)
8. Funnell MM, Peer based behavioural strategies to improve chronic disease self management and clinical outcomes: evidence, logistics, evaluation considerations and needs for future research. Background paper 2 for the WHO Consultation on Peer Support programmes in diabetes University of Michigan, Geneva 2007 5-7 November
9. The clinical effectiveness of diabetes education models for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, Health Technol Assess 2008 12 9 1 136 18796263
10. TA60 Diabetes (types 1 and 2)-patient education models summary. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/index.jsp? action=byID&r=true&o=11496 (accessed 24/7/8)
11. Effectiveness of self management training in Type 2 diabetes. Norris S, Engelgau M, Venkat Narayan K, Diabetes Care 2001 24 561 587 10.2337/diacare.24. 3.561 11289485
12. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K, JAMA 2002 288 14 1775 1779 10.1001/jama.288.14.1775 12365965
13. Department of Health, National Service Framework for Diabetes: Standards Department of Health, London 2001
14. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes. Ismail K, Winkley K, Rabe-Hesketh S, Lancet 2004 363 1589 1597 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16202-8 15145632 (Pubitemid 38625661)
15. Psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Winkley K, Ismail K, Landau H, Eisler I, Br Med J 2006 333 65 71 10.1136/bmj.38874.652569.55 (Pubitemid 44406809)
16. What is the idea behind peer to peer support in diabetes? Simmons D, Bunn C, Cohn S, Graffy J, Diabetes Management 3 1 In Press
17. Heisler M, Different models to mobilize peer support to improve chronic disease self management and clinical outcomes: evidence, logistics, evaluation considerations and needs for future research. Background paper 1 for the WHO Consultation on Peer Support programmes in diabetes University of Michigan, Geneva 2007 5-7 November
18. With a little help from my peers. Meakin J, Diabetes Update (Autumn) 2003 18 21
19. Training programme for peer advisors in diabetes: are they the expert patients in diabetes. Baksi A, Al-Mrayat M, Hogan D, et al. Pract Diab Int 2005 22 4
20. Diabetes control with reciprocal peer support versus nurse care management: a randomized trial. Heisler M, Vijan S, Makki F, Piette JD, Ann Intern Med 2010 153 507 515 20956707
21. Peer advisers compared with specialist health professionals in delivering a training programme on self-management to people with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Baksi A, Al-Mrayat M, Hogan D, et al. Diabet Med 2008 25 9 18717972
22. A team approach: peer group support program for adolescents with diabetes. Moldovanyi CP, Diabetes Educ 1985 11 3 50 52 10.1177/ 014572178501100309 3852739
23. Lay health workers in primary and community health care. Lewin SA, Dick J, Pond P, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005 D004015
24. Spanish diabetes self-management with and without automated telephone reinforcement. Lorig K, Ritter PL, Villa F, Piette JD, Diabetes Care 2008 31 408 414 18096810
25. A randomized trial of an intervention to improve self-care behaviors of African-American women with type 2 diabetes: impact on physical activity. Keyserling TC, Samuel-Hodge CD, Ammerman AS, et al. Diabetes Care 2002 25 9 1576 1583 10.2337/diacare.25.9.1576 12196430 (Pubitemid 41071114)
26. Peer support in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial in primary care with parallel economic and qualitative analyses: pilot study and protocol. Paul G, Smith SM, Whitford DL, O'Shea E, O'Kelly F, O'Dowd T, BMC Fam Pract 2007 8 45 10.1186/1471-2296-8-45 17672892 (Pubitemid 47301205)
27. Peer support for patients with type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial. Smith SM, Paul G, Kelly A, Whitford DL, O'Shea E, O'Dowd T, Br Med J 2011 342 715 10.1136/bmj.d715
28. Telecare motivational interviewing for diabetes patient education and support: a randomised controlled trial based in primary care comparing nurse and peer supporter delivery. Dale J, Caramlau I, Docherty A, Sturt J, Hearnshaw H, Trials 2007 8 1 18 10.1186/1745-6215-8-18 17598895 (Pubitemid 47226214)
29. Peers for Progress: promoting peer support for health around the world. Boothroyd RI, Fisher EB, Fam Pract 2010 27 Supplement 1 62 i68 20483801
30. Diabetes risk factors, diabetes and diabetes care in a rural Australian community. Simmons D, Bourke L, Yau E, Hoodless M, Aust J Rural Health 2007 15 296 303 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2007.00903.x 17760913 (Pubitemid 47343280)
31. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M, "Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance" MRC, London 2008
32. Analysing qualitative data. Pope C, Ziebland S, BMJ 2000 320 114 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114 10625273
33. Goffman E, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life Anchor Books, Carden City, NY 1959
34. Intensified glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes:time for a reappraisal. Yudkin JS, Richter B, Gale EAM, Diabetologia 2010 53 2079 2085 10.1007/s00125-010-1864-z 20686748
35. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach. Position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Diabetologia 2012 55 1577 1596 10.1007/s00125-012-2534-0 22526604
36. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2011. ADA, Diabetes Care 2011 34 Suppl 1 11 S61 21193625