Erratum: Low-valent Ge2 and Ge4 species trapped by N-heterocyclic gallylene (Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (2013) 52 (450-454) DOI: 10.1002/anie.201204440);Low-valent Ge2 and Ge4 species trapped by N-Heterocyclic gallylene

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 450-454

  Doddi, Adinarayana ^a   Gemel, Christian ^a   Winter, Manuela ^a   Fischer, Roland A ^a   Goedecke, Catharina ^b   Rzepa, Henry S ^c   Frenking, Gernot ^b  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bonding analysis; Density functional calculations; Gallium; Germanium; Metalloid clusters; bonding analysis; density functional calculations; gallium; germanium; metalloid clusters

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL BONDS; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; GALLIUM; GERMANIUM; GERMANIUM COMPOUNDS; QUANTUM CHEMISTRY;

BONDING ANALYSIS; GE ATOM; LOW-VALENT; METALLOID CLUSTERS; N-HETEROCYCLIC; PI INTERACTIONS; QUANTUM CHEMICAL CALCULATIONS;

GALLIUM COMPOUNDS;

EID: 84871966408     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: 15213773     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201300460     Document Type: Erratum

References (42)

1. Y. Wang, Y. Xie, P. Wei, R. B. King, H. F. Schaefer, P. von R. Schleyer, G. H. Robinson, Science 2008, 321, 1069-1071.
2. A. Sidiropoulos, C. Jones, A. Stasch, S. Klein, G. Frenking, Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 9881-9884
3. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9701-9704.
4. Y. Wang, Y. Xie, P. Wei, R. B. King, H. F. Schaefer, P. von R. Schleyer, G. H. Robinson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14970-14971.
5. M. Y. Abraham, Y. Wang, Y. Xie, P. Wei, H. F. Schaefer, P. von R. Schleyer, G. H. Robinson, Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 432-435.
6. Y. Wang, G. H. Robinson, Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 337-345
7. Y.Wang, G. H. Robinson, Chem. Commun. 2009, 5201-5213.
8. J. L. Dutton, D. J. D. Wilson, Angew. Chem. 2012, 124, 1506-1509
9. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1477-1480.
10. M. Asay, C. Jones, M. Driess, Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 354-396.
11. N. J. Hardman, B. E. Eichler, P. P. Power, Chem. Commun. 2000, 1991-1992.
12. G. Prabusankar, A. Kempter, C. Gemel, M. K. Schröter, R. A. Fischer, Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 7344-7347
13. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7234-7237.
14. G. Prabusankar, C. Gemel, P. Parameswaran, C. Flener, G. Frenking, R. A. Fischer, Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 5634-5637
15. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5526-5529.
16. A. Schnepf, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 1007-1018
17. A. Schnepf, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 745-758
18. A. Schnepf, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250, 2758-2770.
19. 1H NMR spectrum of 1 are assigned and there are no signals in the typical region of Ge-H groups (about 3.92 and 8.0 ppm) also the IR and Raman spectra does not provide any indications for the presence of terminal Ge-H moieties: K. C. Thimer, S. M. I. Al-Rafia, M. J. Ferguson, R. McDonald, E. Rivard, Chem. Commun. 2009, 7119-7121
20. S. L. Choong, W. D. Woodul, C. Schenk, A. Stasch, A. F. Richards, C. Jones, Organometallics 2011, 30, 5543-5550.
21. Crystal Structure analyses (Oxford Excalibur 2 diffractometer): The structural solution and refinement was performed using the programs SHELXS-86 and SHELXL-97: G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXS-97, Program for the Solution of Crystal Structures, Universität Göttingen, 1997
22. G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXL-97, Program for Crystal Structure Refinement, Universität Göttingen, 1997
23. 2 = 0.1024 (I > 2σ(I)), GOF = 1.026. The overall data quality is limited, as revealed by the R(int)value of 0.1312, because the crystal was small and only weakly diffracting. No time dependency of the quality within the measurement has been observed. Attempts to obtain better crystals have not been successful
24. 2 = 0.0812 (I>2σ(I)), GOF= 1.034. The disordered solvent molecule in 2 was squeezed out with the program Platon 1.13: A. L. Spek, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 1990, 46, C34. The fluorobenzene molecule is included in the empirical formula. CCDC 833302 (1) and CCDC 833301 (2) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data-request/cif.
25. J. S. Kasper, S. M. Richards, Acta Crystallogr. 1964, 17, 752-755.
26. A. Schnepf, R. Köppe, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 940-942
27. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 911-913
28. A. F. Richards, H. Hope, P. P. Power, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 4205-4208
29. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4071-4074.
30. Y. Peng, H. Fan, H. Zhu, H.W. Roesky, J. Magull, C. E. Hughes, Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 3525-3527
31. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3443-3445.
32. [1, 2] The NHGa prefers the bridging position in contrast to the terminal bonded NHC. The NHC and NHGa ligand properties are characteristically different which has consequences for the Ge-Ge bond situation.
33. V. Jonas, G. Frenking, M. T. Reetz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 8741-8753.
34. R. S. Ghadwal, H.W. Roesky, K. Pröpper, B. Dittrich, S. Klein, G. Frenking, Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 5486-5490
35. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 5374-5378.
36. One referee suggested that the reason for the Ge-Ge p bonding could be the slightly larger electronegativity of Ge compared with Ga. We checked this by calculating the silicon and tin homologues of 1M. The electronegativities of Si (1.7) and Sn (1.7) are smaller than that of Ga (1.8) but the electronic structure of the group-14 homologues showed also Si-Si and Sn-Sn p bonding, respectively.
37. A. D. Becke, K. E. Edgecombe, J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92, 5397-5403.
38. [24b] where two S-S π orbitals of three-membered cyclic fragments yield S-S σ bonds.
39. C. G. Davies, R. J. Gillespie, J. J. Park, J. Passmore, Inorg. Chem. 1971, 10, 2781-2785
40. J. Passmore, G. Sutherland, T. Whidden, P. S.White, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1980, 289-290.
41. Y. Canac, D. Bourissou, A. Baceiredo, H. Gornitzka, W. W. Schoeller, G. Bertrand, Science 1998, 279, 2080-2082
42. S. Yao, C. Milsmann, E. Bill, K.Wieghardt, M. Driess, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13536-13537.