The "Oxford Heup Score": The translation and validation of a questionnaire into Dutch to evaluate the results of total hip arthroplasty

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 204-211

  Gosens, Taco ^a   Hoefnagels, Nicolette H M ^a   De Vet, Riekie C W ^b   Dhert, Woliter J A ^c   Van Langelaan, Evert J ^d   Bulstra, Sjoerd K ^a   Geesink, Ruud G T ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^d RIJNLAND HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NETHERLANDS; OXFORD HEUP SCORE; PATIENT CODING; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION; SURGEON; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION PROCESS; WALKING AID;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEXUALITY; TRANSLATIONS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WALKING;

EID: 20044392908     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016470510030580     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1996; 8: 307-10.
2. Bland J M, Altman D G. Measurement error. BMJ 1996; 312: 1654.
3. Britton A R, Murray D W, Bulstrode C J, McPherson K, Denham R A. Pain levels after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1997; 79 (1): 93-8
4. Carlsson A M. Assessment of chronic pain. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analog scale. Pain 1983; 16: 87-101.
5. Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1972; 54: 61-7.
6. Cronbach L J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16 (3): 297-334.
7. Currey H L F. Osteoarthritis of the hip and sexual activity. Ann Rheum Dis 1997; 29: 488-93.
8. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1996a; 78: 185-90.
9. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. The problem of "noise" in monitoring patient-based outcomes: generic, disease-specific and site-specific instruments for total hip replacement. J Health Serv Res Policy 1996b; 4: 224-31.
10. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery. Qual Health Care 1996c; 5: 81-8.
11. Fitzpatrick R, Dawson J. Health-related quality of life and the assessment of outcomes of total hip replacement surgery. Psychol Health 1997; 12: 793-803.
12. Fitzpatrick R, Morris R, Hajat S, Reeves B, Murray D W, Hannen D, Rigge M, Williams O, Gregg P. The value of short and simple measures to assess outcomes for patients of total hip replacement surgery. Qual Health Care 2000; 9: 146-50.
13. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46 (12): 1417-32.
14. Guyatt G H. The philosophy of health related quality of life translation. Qual Life Res 1993; 2 (6): 461-5.
15. Harris W H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures; treatment by mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1969; 51: 737-55.
16. Johnston R C, Moines D, Fitzgerald R H, Harris W H, Poss R, Muller M, Sledge C B. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1990; 72 (2): 161-8.
17. Kazis L E, Anderson J J, Meenam R F. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care (Suppl) 1989; 27: 178-89.
18. Liang M H, Cullen K E, Poss R. Primary total joint replacement: evaluation of patients. Ann Intern Med 1982; 97: 735-9.
19. Lieberman J R, Dorey F, Shekelle P, Schumacher L, Thomas B, Kilgius D, Finerman G A. Differences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1996; 78 (6): 835-8.
20. Mc Graw K O, Wong S P. Forming is references about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psych Methods 1996; 1: 30-46.
21. McMurray R, Heaton J, Sloper P, Nettleton S. Measurement of patient perceptions of pain and disability inrelation to total hip replacement: the place of the Oxford Hip Score in mixed methods. Qual Health Care 1999; 8: 229-33.
22. Merle d'Aubigné R M, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1954; 36: 451-75.
23. Stern S H, Fuchs M D, Ganz S B, Classi P, Sculco T, Salvati E. Sexual function after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1991; (269): 228-35.
24. Van der Zee K, Sanderman R. RAND-36 een handleiding. Noordelijk Centrum voor Gezondheids vraagstukken. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, 1993.
25. Van der Zee K, Sanderman R, Heyink J. Psychometrische kwaliteit van de MOS 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in een Nederlandse populatie. Tijdschr Soc Gezondheidsr 1993; 71: 183-91.
26. Wright J G, Young N L. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 1977; 50: 239-46.
27. Wright J G, Rudicel S, Feinstein A R. Ask patients what they want: evaluation of individual complaints before total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1994; 76: 229-35.