Performance prediction of F1 hybrids between recombinant inbred lines derived from two elite maize inbred lines

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Volumn 126, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 189-201

  Guo, Tingting ^a,b   Li, Huihui ^b   Yan, Jianbing ^d   Tang, Jihua ^e   Li, Jiansheng ^a   Zhang, Zhiwu ^c   Zhang, Luyan ^b   Wang, Jiankang ^b  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF PLANT PROTECTION   (China)

^c Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^d HUAZHONG AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^e HENAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMBINED MODEL; FIELD TEST; GENETIC ARCHITECTURE; GENETIC MODELS; GENETIC VARIANCE; GRAIN YIELD; INBRED LINE; MAIZE BREEDING; PERFORMANCE PREDICTION; PREDICTION ACCURACY; PREDICTION MODEL; RECOMBINANT INBRED LINES; THEORETICAL STUDY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; GENES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PLANTS (BOTANY);

FORECASTING;

ZEA MAYS;

PLANT DNA; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROSS BREEDING; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION; MAIZE; PHENOTYPE; PLANT GENE; PLANT GENOME; REPRODUCIBILITY;

COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROSSES, GENETIC; DNA, PLANT; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, PLANT; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ZEA MAYS;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84871925454     PISSN: 00405752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-012-1973-9     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Allard RW (1960) Principles of plant breeding. Wiley, New York 485 pp.
2. Bernardo R (1994) Prediction of maize single-cross performance using RFLPs and information from related hybrids. Crop Sci 34: 20-25.
3. Bernardo R (1995) Genetic models for predicting maize single-cross performance inunbalanced yield trial data. Crop Sci 35: 141-147.
4. Bernardo R (1996a) Best linear unbiased prediction of maize single-cross performance. Crop Sci 36: 50-56.
5. Bernardo R (1996b) Best linear unbiased prediction of the performance of crosses between untested maize inbreds. Crop Sci 36: 872-876.
6. Bernardo R (1998) A model for marker-assisted selection among single crosses with multiple genetic markers. Theor Appl Genet 97: 473-478.
7. Bernardo R (1999) Marker-assisted best linear unbiased prediction of single-cross performance. Crop Sci 39: 1277-1282.
8. Bernardo R, Yu J (2007) Prospects for genomewide selection for quantitative traits in maize. Crop Sci 47: 1082-1090.
9. Charcosset A, Essioux L (1994) The effect of population structure on the relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci. Theor Appl Genet 89: 336-343.
10. Cockerham CC (1967) Prediction of double crosses from single crosses. Der Züchter 37: 160-169.
11. Comstock RE, Robinson HF (1948) The components of genetic variance in populations. Biometrics 4: 254-266.
12. Comstock RE, Robinson HF (1952) Estimation of average dominance of genes. In: Gowen JW (ed) Heterosis. ISU Press, Ames, pp 494-516.
13. De Los Campos G, Naya H, Gianola D, Crossa J, Legarra A, Manfredi E, Weigel K, Cotes JM (2009) Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree. Genetics 182: 375-385.
14. Frisch M, Thiemann A, Fu J, Schrag TA, Scholten S, Melchinger AE (2010) Transcriptome-based distance measures for grouping of germplasm and prediction of hybrid performance in maize. Theor Appl Genet 120: 441-450.
15. Gardner CO, Eberhart SA (1966) Analysis and interpretation of the variety cross diallel and related populations. Biometrics 22: 439-452.
16. Griffing B (1956a) Concept of general and specific combing ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust J Biol Sci 9: 463-493.
17. Griffing B (1956b) A generalized treatment of the use of diallel crosses in quantitative inheritance. Heredity 10: 31-50.
18. Hallauer AR (1990) Methods used in developing maize inbreds. Maydica 35: 1-16.
19. Hallauer AR, Carena MJ, Filho JBM (2010) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Iowa State University Press, Ames.
20. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002) SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Eco Notes 2: 618-620.
21. Henderson CR (1975) Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 31: 423-447.
22. Henderson CR (1984) Applications of linear models in animal breeding. University of Guelph, Guelph.
23. Hua J, Xing Y, Wu W, Xu C, Sun X, Yu S, Zhang Q (2003) Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Nat Acad Sci 100: 2574-2579.
24. Jenkins MT (1934) Methods of estimating the performance of double crosses in corn. J Am Soc Agron 26: 199-204.
25. Jordan DR, Tao Y, Godwin ID, Henzell RG, Cooper M, McIntyre CL (2003) Prediction of hybrid performance in grain sorghum using RFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet 106: 559-567.
26. Kearsey MJ, Jinks JL (1968) A general method of detecting additive, dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits. I: theory. Heredity 23: 403-409.
27. Lai J, Li R, Xu X, Jin W, Xu M, Zhao H, Xiang Z, Song W, Ying K, Zhang M, Jiao Y, Ni P, Zhang J et al (2010) Genome-wide patterns of genetic variation among elite maize inbred lines. Nat Genet 42: 1027-1030.
28. Li Y, Wang T (2010) Germplasm base of maize breeding in China and formation of key parents in maize breeding in China (in Chinese with English abstract). J Maize Sci 18(5): 1-8.
29. Li H, Ye G, Wang J (2007) A modified algorithm for the improvement of composite interval mapping. Genetics 175: 361-374.
30. Lorenzana RE, Bernardo R (2009) Accuracy of genotypic value predictions for marker-based selection in biparental plant populations. Theor Appl Genet 120: 151-161.
31. Maenhout S, Baets BD, Haesaert G (2010) Prediction of maize single-cross hybrid performance: support vector machine regression versus best linear prediction. Theor Appl Genet 120: 415-427.
32. Melchinger AE (1999) Genetic diversity and heterosis. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. ASA-CSSA, Madison, pp 99-118.
33. Melchinger AE, Geiger HH, Seitz G, Schmidt GA (1987) Optimum prediction of three-way crosses from single crosses in forage maize (Zea mays L.). Theor Appl Genet 74: 339-345.
34. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157: 1819-1829.
35. Quaas RL, Pollak EJ (1980) Modified equations for sire models with groups. J Dairy Sci 54: 1868-1872.
36. Schrag TA, Melchinger AE, Sørensen AP, Frisch M (2006) Prediction of single-cross hybrid performance for grain yield and grain dry matter content in maize using AFLP markers associated with QTL. Theor Appl Genet 113: 1037-1047.
37. Smith OS (1986) Covariance between line per se and testcross performance. Crop Sci 26: 540-543.
38. 2 population. Theor Appl Genet 120: 333-340.
39. Teng W, Cao J, Chen Y, Liu X, Jing X, Zhang F, Li J (2004) Analysis of maize heterotic groups and patterns during past decade in China (in Chinese with English abstract). Scienta Agricultura Sinica 37(12): 1804-1811.
40. Vuylsteke M, Kuiper M, Stam P (2000) Chromosomal regions involved in hybrid performance and heterosis: their AFLP (R)-based identification and practical use in prediction models. Heredity 85: 208-218.
41. Wang J, van Ginkel M, Podlich D, Ye G, Trethowan R, Pfeiffer W, DeLacy IH, Cooper M, Rajaram S (2003) Comparison of two breeding strategies by computer simulation. Crop Sci 43: 1764-1773.
42. Wang J, van Ginkel M, Trethowan R, Ye G, Delacy I, Podlich D, Cooper M (2004) Simulating the effects of dominance and epistasis on selection response in the CIMMYT Wheat Breeding Program using QuCim. Crop Sci 44: 2006-2018.
43. Yu Y, Wang R, Shi Y, Song Y, Wang T, Li Y (2007) Genetic diversity and structure of the core collection for maize lines in China. Maydica 52: 181-194.
44. Zaidi PH, Srinivasan G, Sanchez C (2003) Relationship between line per se and cross performance under low nitrogen fertility in tropical maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica 48: 221-231.
45. Zhang L, Li H, Li Z, Wang J (2008) Interactions between markers can be caused by the dominance effect of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 180: 1177-1190.