Key principles for a national clinical decision support knowledge sharing framework: Synthesis of insights from leading subject matter experts

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 199-207

  Kawamoto, Kensaku ^a   Hongsermeier, Tonya ^b   Wright, Adam ^c   Lewis, Janet ^b   Bell, Douglas S ^d   Middleton, Blackford ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b PARTNERS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; LEGAL LIABILITY; LICENSING; MEDICAL LIABILITY; NATIONAL CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT KNOWLEDGE SHARING FRAMEWORK; PROCESS MONITORING; STANDARDIZATION;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84871905801     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000887     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. McDonald CJ. Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectability of man. N Engl J Med 1976;295:1351-5.
2. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, et al. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005;330:765-68.
3. Lyman JA, Cohn WF, Bloomrosen M, et al. Clinical decision support: progress and opportunities. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:487-92.
4. Health Information Management Systems Society. EMR Adoption Model. http://www.himssanalytics.org/emram/index.aspx (accessed May 2012).
5. Osheroff JA, Teich JM, Middleton B, et al. A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:141-5.
6. Simon SR, Kaushal R, Cleary PD, et al. Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:507-12.
7. Kawamoto K, Lobach DF. Design, implementation, use, and preliminary evaluation of SEBASTIAN, a standards-based Web service for clinical decision support. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2005:380-4.
8. Kawamoto K, Lobach DF. Proposal for fulfilling strategic objectives of the U.S. roadmap for national action on decision support through a serviceoriented architecture leveraging HL7 services. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:146-55.
9. Middleton B, Anderson J, Fletcher J, et al. Use of the WWW for distributed knowledge engineering for an EMR: the Knowledge Bank concept. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 1998:126-30.
10. Kawamoto K, Del Fiol G, Orton C, et al. System-agnostic clinical decision support services: benefits and challenges for scalable decision support. Open Med Inform J 2010;4:245-54.
11. Kawamoto K. Integration of knowledge resources into applications to enable clinical decision support: architectural considerations. In: Greenes RA, ed. Clinical Decision Support: the Road Ahead. Boston: Elsevier Academic Press, 2007:503-38.
12. Boxwala AA, Rocha BH, Maviglia S, et al. A multi-layered framework for disseminating knowledge for computer-based decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(Suppl 1):i132-9.
13. Scalise D. Physician order entry. IMKI to success. Institute for Medical Knowledge Implementation. Hosp Health Netw 2002;76:24, 26.
14. Pryor TA, Hripcsak G. The Arden Syntax for medical logic modules. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1993;10:215-24.
15. Greenes R, Bloomrosen M, Brown-Connolly NE, et al. The Morningside Initiative: collaborative development of a knowledge repository to accelerate adoption of clinical decision support. Open Med Inform J 2010;4:278-90.
16. Middleton B. The Clinical Decision Support Consortium. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009;150:26-30.
17. Duke Office of Research Support. Defining Research With Human Subjects. https://ors.duke.edu/researcher/defining-research-with-human-subjects (accessed Apr 2012).
18. National Institutes of Health Office of Extramural Research. Frequently Asked Questions From Applicants: Human Subjects Research - General. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/hs/faqs_aps_hsr.htm (accessed Apr 2012).
19. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Chart 1: is an Activity Research Involving Human Subjects Covered by 45 CFR part 46? http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/checklists/decisioncharts.html#c1 (accessed Apr 2012).
20. Osheroff JA, Pifer EA, Teich JM, et al. Improving Outcomes with Clinical Decision Support: An Implementer's Guide. Chicago, IL: Health Information Management and Systems Society, 2005.
21. Haas H, Brown A. Web Services Glossary. W3C Working Group Note 11. 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-ws-gloss-20040211/ (accessed May 2012).
22. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004;24:105-12.
23. Sordo M, Boxwala AA, Ogunyemi O, et al. Description and status update on GELLO: a proposed standardized object-oriented expression language for clinical decision support. Medinfo 2004:164-8.
24. Montella D, Brown SH, Elkin PL, et al. Comparison of SNOMED CT versus Medcin terminology concept coverage for mild traumatic brain injury. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2011:969-78.
25. Palchuk MB, Klumpenaar M, Jatkar T, et al. Enabling hierarchical view of RxNorm with NDF-RT drug classes. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2010:577-81.
26. Jha AK. Meaningful use of electronic health records: the road ahead. JAMA 2010;304:1709-10.
27. Health Level 7. HL7 Virtual Medical Record (vMR) Project Wiki. http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Virtual_Medical_Record_(vMR) (accessed May 2012).
28. National Quality Forum (NQF). Quality Data Model. http://www.qualityforum.org/QualityDataModel.aspx (accessed May 2012).
29. National Quality Forum (NQF). Driving Quality and Performance Measurementda Foundation for Clinical Decision Support: A Consensus Report. Washington, DC: NQF, 2010. http://www.qualityforum.org/WorkArea/linkit.aspx?LinkIdentifier=id&ItemID=52608 (accessed May 2012).
30. Wright A, Sittig DF, Ash JS, et al. Development and evaluation of a comprehensive clinical decision support taxonomy: comparison of front-end tools in commercial and internally developed electronic health record systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:232-42.
31. Sittig DF, Wright A, Meltzer S, et al. Comparison of clinical knowledge management capabilities of commercially-available and leading internally-developed electronic health records. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2011;11:13.
32. Borbolla D, Otero C, Lobach DF, et al. Implementation of a clinical decision support system using a service model: results of a feasibility study. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010;160:816-20.
33. Health Level 7. HL7 Decision Support Service Standard. http://www.hl7.org/v3ballot2012may/html/infrastructure/dss/dss.html (accessed May 2012).