A multi-layered framework for disseminating knowledge for computer-based decision support

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 18, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages 132-139

  Boxwala, Aziz A ^a   Rocha, Beatriz H ^b,c   Maviglia, Saverio ^b,c   Kashyap, Vipul ^d   Meltzer, Seth ^b   Kim, Jihoon ^a   Tsurikova, Ruslana ^b   Wright, Adam ^b,c   Paterno, Marilyn D ^b,c   Fairbanks, Amanda ^b   Middleton, Blackford ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d CIGNA Health Care   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; KNOWLEDGE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER PROGRAM;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DECISION MAKING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 84863538545     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000334     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Field MF, Lohr KN, eds; Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines, Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1990.
2. Mangione-Smith R, DeCristofaro AH, Setodji CM, et al. The quality of ambulatory care delivered to children in the United States. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1515-23.
3. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2635-45.
4. Garg AX, Adhikari NKJ, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293:1223-38.
5. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, et al. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005;330:765.
6. Dexter PR, Perkins S, Overhage JM, et al. A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med 2001;345:965-70.
7. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 1993;342:1317-22.
8. Sintchenko V, Coiera E, Iredell JR, et al. Comparative impact of guidelines, clinical data, and decision support on prescribing decisions: an interactive web experiment with simulated cases. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:71-7.
9. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:742-52.
10. Codish S, Shiffman RN. A model of ambiguity and vagueness in clinical practice guideline recommendations. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2005:146-50.
11. Boxwala AA, Tu S, Peleg M, et al. Toward a representation format for sharable clinical guidelines. J Biomed Inform 2001;34:157-69.
12. Osheroff J, Pifer E, Teich J, et al. Improving Outcomes with Clinical Decision Support: An Implementer's Guide. 1st edn. Productivity Press, 2005.
13. Hripcsak G. Writing Arden Syntax Medical Logic Modules. Comput Biol Med 1994;24:331-63.
14. Pryor TA, Hripcsak G. Sharing MLM's: an experiment between Columbia-Presbyterian and LDS Hospital. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1993:399-403.
15. Johnson PD, Tu SW, Musen MA, et al. A virtual medical record for guideline-based decision support. Proc AMIA Symp 2001:294-8.
16. Young O, Shahar Y, Liel Y, et al. Runtime application of Hybrid-Asbru clinical guidelines. J Biomed Inform 2007;40:507-26.
17. Tu SW, Musen MA. Modeling data and knowledge in the EON guideline architecture. Stud Health Technol Inform 2001;84:280-4.
18. Boxwala AA, Peleg M, Tu S, et al. GLIF3: a representation format for sharable computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines. J Biomed Inform 2004;37:147-61.
19. Fox J, Patkar V, Thomson R. Decision support for health care: the PROforma evidence base. Inform Prim Care 2006;14:49-54.
20. Tu SW, Campbell JR, Glasgow J, et al. The SAGE Guideline Model: achievements and overview. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:589-98.
21. Collins SA, Currie LM, Bakken S, et al. Information needs, Infobutton Manager use, and satisfaction by clinician type: a case study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:140-2.
22. Lobach DF, Kawamoto K, Anstrom KJ, et al. Development, deployment and usability of a point-of-care decision support system for chronic disease management using the recently-approved HL7 decision support service standard. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007;129:861-5.
23. Shahar Y, Young O, Shalom E, et al. The Digital electronic Guideline Library (DeGeL): a hybrid framework for representation and use of clinical guidelines. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004;101:147-51.
24. Hatsek A, Young O, Shalom E, et al. DeGeL: a clinical-guidelines library and automated guideline-support tools. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008;139:203-12.
25. Shiffman RN, Karras BT, Agrawal A, et al. GEM: a proposal for a more comprehensive guideline document model using XML. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000;7:488-98.
26. Wright A, Sittig DF, Ash JS, et al. Clinical decision support capabilities of commercially-available clinical information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:637-44.
27. Sittig DF, Wright A, Meltzer S, et al. Comparison of clinical knowledge management capabilities of commercially-available and leading internally-developed electronic health records. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2011;11:13.
28. Sherman EH, Hripcsak G, Starren J, et al. Using intermediate states to improve the ability of the Arden Syntax to implement care plans and reuse knowledge. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1995:238-42.
29. Wang D, Peleg M, Tu SW, et al. Design and implementation of the GLIF3 guideline execution engine. J Biomed Inform 2004;37:305-18.
30. Boxwala AA, Greenes RA, Deibel SR. Architecture for a multipurpose guideline execution engine. Proc AMIA Symp 1999:701-5.
31. Murphy SN, Mendis M, Hackett K, et al. Architecture of the open-source clinical research chart from Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007:548-52.
32. Middleton B, Anderson J, Fletcher J, et al. Use of the WWW for distributed knowledge engineering for an EMR: the KnowledgeBank concept. Proc AMIA Symp 1998:126-30.
33. Middleton B. The clinical decision support consortium. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009;150:26-30.
34. Clinical Decision Support Consortium. Knowledge Management Portal. http://cdsportal.partners.org/ (accessed 7 Sep 2011).
35. Sordo M, Boxwala AA, Ogunyemi O, et al. Description and status update on GELLO: a proposed standardized object-oriented expression language for clinical decision support. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004;107:164-8.
36. HITSP Summary Documents Using HL7 Continuity of Care Document (CCD) Component v 2.5. New York, NY: Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel, 2009.
37. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Aspirin for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:396e404.
38. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for high blood pressure: recommendations and rationale. Am J Prev Med 2003;25:159-64.
39. Paterno MD, Schaeffer M, Van Putten C, et al. Challenges in creating an enterprise clinical rules service. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008:1086.
40. Shiffman RN, Dixon J, Brandt C, et al. The GuideLine Implementability Appraisal (GLIA): development of an instrument to identify obstacles to guideline implementation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2005;5:23.
41. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. 2nd edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience, 2002.
42. Waitman LR, Miller RA. Pragmatics of implementing guidelines on the front lines. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:436-8.