The key actor: A qualitative study of patient participation in the handover process in Europe

BMJ Quality and Safety

Volumn 21, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2012, Pages

  Flink, Maria ^a,b   Hesselink, Gijs ^c   Pijnenborg, Loes ^d   Wollersheim, Hub ^c   Vernooij Dassen, Myrra ^c   Dudzik Urbaniak, Ewa ^e   Orrego, Carola ^f   Toccafondi, Giulio ^g   Schoonhoven, Lisette ^c,h   Gademan, Petra J ⁱ   Johnson, Julie K ^j   Oḧlén, Gunnar ^a,b   Hansagi, Helen ^a   Olsson, Mariann ^a,b   Barach, Paul ^k,l  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^e National Center for Quality Assessment in Health Care   (Poland)

^f UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^g Clinical Risk Management and Patient Safety Centre   (Italy)

^h UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ Primary Health Care   (Netherlands)

^j UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^k UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^l UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASTHMA; CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; CLINICAL HANDOVER; DIABETES MELLITUS; EUROPE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEART FAILURE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT POSITIONING; PATIENT PREFERENCE; POLYPHARMACY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EUROPEAN UNION; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STANDARDS;

CHRONIC DISEASE; EUROPEAN UNION; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; PATIENT HANDOFF; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENTS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84871905287     PISSN: 20445415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001171     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Forster AJ, Clark HD, Menard A, et al. Adverse events among medical patients after discharge from hospital. Can Med Assoc J 2004;170:345-9. (Pubitemid 38223452)
2. Forster AJ, Murff HJ, Peterson JF, et al. The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:161-7. (Pubitemid 36231621)
3. Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, et al. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians - Implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA 2007;297:831-41. (Pubitemid 46333948)
4. Moore C, Wisnivesky J, Williams S, et al. Medical errors related to discontinuity of care from an inpatient to an outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med 2003;18:646-51. (Pubitemid 37047038)
5. Tam VC, Knowles SR, Cornish PL, et al. Frequency, type and clinical importance of medication history errors at admission to hospital: a systematic review. Can Med Assoc J 2005;173:510-15. (Pubitemid 41225048)
6. Halasyamani L, Kripalani S, Coleman E, et al. Transition of care for hospitalized elderly patients - Development of a discharge checklist for hospitalists. J Hosp Med 2006;1:354-60.
7. Johnson A, Sandford J. Written and verbal information versus verbal information only for patients being discharged from acute hospital settings to home: systematic review. Health Educ Res 2005;20:423-9. (Pubitemid 41399475)
8. Coleman EA, Parry C, Chalmers S, et al. The care transitions intervention - Results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1822-8. (Pubitemid 44455163)
9. Jack BW, Chetty VK, Anthony D, et al. A reengineered hospital discharge program to decrease rehospitalization. A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:178-88.
10. Davis RE, Jacklin R, Sevdalis N, et al. Patient involvement in patient safety: what factors influence patient participation and engagement? Health Expect 2007;10:259-67. (Pubitemid 47196355)
11. Say R, Murtagh M, Thomson R. Patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making: A narrative review. Patient Educ Couns 2006;60:102-14. (Pubitemid 43143304)
12. Meeuwesen L, van den Brink-Muinen A, Hofstede G. Can dimensions of national culture predict cross-national differences in medical communication? Patient Educ Couns 2009;75:58-66.
13. Coulter A, Jenkinson C. European patients' views on the responsiveness of health systems and healthcare providers. Eur J Public Health 2005;15:355-60. (Pubitemid 41344534)
14. Improving the continuity of patient care through identification and implementation of novel patient handover processes in Europe. http://www.handover.eu (accessed 21 Oct 2011).
15. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:349-57. (Pubitemid 350186969)
16. Hansagi H, Olsson M, Glas S, et al. Report on the barriers and facilitators to effective handovers in the social, linguistic and technological context in which they take place. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht Medical Center, for the European Union, 2010.
17. Johnson J, Barach P, Vernooij-Dassen M. A standardized approach for conducting qualitative research across multiple countries. BMJ Quality and Safety 2012.
18. Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ 2000;320:50-2. (Pubitemid 30173021)
19. Thorne S. Ethical and representational issues in qualitative secondary analysis. Qual Health Res 1998;8:547-55. (Pubitemid 128624471)
20. Corbin J, Strauss A. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol 1990;13:3-21.
21. ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development Company, GmbH, Berlin, Germany. http://www.atlasti.com/ (accessed 21 Mar 2011).
22. Barach P, Gademan P, Kalkman C, et al. Report on how variations in handover processes lead to near misses and adverse outcomes, and identifying standardized elements of communication. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht Medical Center, for the European Union, 2010.
23. Hesselink G, Wollersheim H, Barach P, et al. Report on challenges in patient care and the factors that influence change in practice. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht Medical Center, for the European Union, 2010.
24. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1277-88. (Pubitemid 41645161)
25. Street RL Jr, Krupat E, Bell RA, et al. Beliefs about control in the physician-patient relationship: effect on communication in medical encounters. J Gen Intern Med 2003;18:609-16. (Pubitemid 37047033)
26. Street RL Jr, Gordon HS, Ward MM, et al. Patient participation in medical encounters: why some patients are more involved than others. Med Care 2005;43:960-9. (Pubitemid 41442461)
27. Longtin Y, Sax H, Leape LL, et al. Patient participation: current knowledge and applicability to patient safety. Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85:53-62.
28. Tariman JD, Berry DL, Cochrane B, et al. Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 2010;21:1145-51.