Neuroanatomical correlates of biological motion detection

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 457-463

  Gilaie Dotan, Sharon ^a,b   Kanai, Ryota ^a,c   Bahrami, Bahador ^a   Rees, Geraint ^a,b   Saygin, Ayse P ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Individual differences; Point light displays; Premotor cortex; Temporal cortex; Voxel based morphometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GRAY MATTER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NEUROANATOMY; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREMOTOR CORTEX; SUPERIOR TEMPORAL SULCUS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VOXEL BASED MORPHOMETRY;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84871880479     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.11.027     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ahlstrom V., Blake R., Ahlstrom U. Perception of biological motion. Perception 1997, 26(12):1539-1548.
2. Ashburner J. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. NeuroImage 2007, 38(1):95-113.
3. Bertenthal B., Pinto J. Global processing of biological motion. Psychological Science 1994, 5(4):221-225.
4. Blake R., Shiffrar M. Perception of human motion. Annual Review of Psychology 2007, 58:47-73.
5. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10(4):433-436.
6. Chandrasekaran C., Turner L., Bulthoff H.H., Thornton I.M. Attentional networks and biological motion. Psihologija 2010, 43(1):5-20.
7. De-Wit L., Lefevre C., Kentridge R., Rees G., Saygin A.P. Investigating the status of biological stimuli as objects of attention in multiple object tracking. PLoS One 2011, 6(3):e16232. 10.1371/journal.pone.0016232.
8. De Lussanet M.H.E., Fadiga L., Michels L., Seitz R.J., Kleiser R., Lappe M. Interaction of visual hemifield and body view in biological motion perception. European Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 27(2):514-522.
9. Fleming S.M., Weil R.S., Nagy Z., Dolan R.J., Rees G. Relating introspective accuracy to individual differences in brain structure. Science 2010, 329(5998):1541-1543.
10. Furl N., van Rijsbergen N.J., Kiebel S.J., Friston K.J., Treves A., Dolan R.J. Modulation of perception and brain activity by predictable trajectories of facial expressions. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20(3):694-703.
11. Gilaie-Dotan S., Bentin S., Harel M., Rees G., Saygin A.P. Normal form from biological motion despite impaired ventral stream function. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49(5):1033-1043.
12. Gilaie-Dotan S., Harel A., Bentin S., Kanai R., Rees G. Neuroanatomical correlates of visual car expertise. NeuroImage 2012, 62(1):147-153. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.017.
13. Gilaie-Dotan S., Kanai R., Rees G. Anatomy of human sensory cortices reflects inter-individual variability in time estimation. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 2011, 5:76. 10.3389/fnint.2011.00076.
14. Green B.F. Figure coherence in the kinetic depth effect. J Exp Psychol 1961, 62:272-282.
15. Grosbras M.H., Beaton S., Eickhoff S.B. Brain regions involved in human movement perception: a quantitative voxel-based meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping 2012, 33(2):431-454.
16. Grossman E.D., Battelli L., Pascual-Leone A. Repetitive TMS over posterior STS disrupts perception of biological motion. Vision Research 2005, 45(22):2847-2853.
17. Grossman E.D., Donnelly M., Price R., Pickens D., Morgan V., Neighbor G., et al. Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12(5):711-720.
18. Grossman E.D., Jardine N.L., Pyles J.A. fMR-adaptation reveals invariant coding of biological motion on human STS. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2011, 5:12. 10.3389/neuro.09.015.2010.
19. Hayasaka S., Phan K.L., Liberzon I., Worsley K.J., Nichols T.E. Nonstationary cluster-size inference with random field and permutation methods. NeuroImage 2004, 22(2):676-687.
20. Hein G., Knight R.T. Superior temporal sulcus-It's my area: or is it?. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20(12):2125-2136.
21. Herrington J.D., Nymberg C., Schultz R.T. Biological motion task performance predicts superior temporal sulcus activity. Brain and Cognition 2011, 77(3):372-381. 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.09.001.
22. Hiris E. Detection of biological and nonbiological motion. Journal of Vision 2007, 7(12):1-16. 4.
23. Ikeda H., Blake R., Watanabe K. Eccentric perception of biological motion is unscalably poor. Vision Research 2005, 45(15):1935-1943.
24. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics 1973, 14:201-211.
25. Jung W.H., Gu B.M., Kang D.H., Park J.Y., Yoo S.Y., Choi C.H., et al. BOLD response during visual perception of biological motion in obsessive-compulsive disorder. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 2009, 259(1):46-54.
26. Kaiser M.D., Shiffrar M., Pelphrey K.A. Socially tuned: brain responses differentiating human and animal motion. Society for Neuroscience 2011, 10.1080/17470919.2011.614003.
27. Kanai R., Bahrami B., Rees G. Human parietal cortex structure predicts individual differences in perceptual rivalry. Current Biology 2010, 20(18):1626-1630.
28. Kanai R., Bahrami B., Roylance R., Rees G. Online social network size is reflected in human brain structure. Proceedings: Biological Sciences 2011, 10.1098/rspb.2011.1959.
29. Kanai R., Rees G. The structural basis of inter-individual differences in human behaviour and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2011, 12(4):231-242.
30. Kesten H. Accelerated stochastic approximation. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1958, 29:41-59.
31. Kim J., Park S., Blake R. Perception of biological motion in schizophrenia and healthy individuals: a behavioral and FMRI study. PLoS One 2011, 6(5):e19971. 10.1371/journal.pone.0019971.
32. Levinson E., Sekuler R. Adaptation alters perceived direction of motion. Vision Research 1976, 16(7):779-781.
33. Maguire E.A., Gadian D.G., Johnsrude I.S., Good C.D., Ashburner J., Frackowiak R.S., et al. Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2000, 97(8):4398-4403.
34. Michels L., Kleiser R., de Lussanet M.H., Seitz R.J., Lappe M. Brain activity for peripheral biological motion in the posterior superior temporal gyrus and the fusiform gyrus: dependence on visual hemifield and view orientation. NeuroImage 2009, 45(1):151-159.
35. Michels L., Lappe M., Vaina L.M. Visual areas involved in the perception of human movement from dynamic form analysis. NeuroReport 2005, 16(10):1037-1041.
36. Miller L., Saygin A.P. Intersubject variability in the use of form and motion cues during biological motion perception. Journal of Vision 2012, 12(9):460.
37. Nelissen K., Vanduffel W., Orban G.A. Charting the lower superior temporal region, a new motion-sensitive region in monkey superior temporal sulcus. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26(22):5929-5947.
38. Oram M.W., Perrett D.I. Integration of form and motion in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area (STPa) of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 1996, 76(1):109-129.
39. Pavlova M.A. Biological motion processing as a hallmark of social cognition. Cerebral Cortex 2012, 22(5):981-995. 10.1093/cercor/bhr156.
40. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 1997, 10(4):437-442.
41. Pelphrey K.A., Mitchell T.V., McKeown M.J., Goldstein J., Allison T., McCarthy G. Brain activity evoked by the perception of human walking: controlling for meaningful coherent motion. Journal of Neurophysiology 2003, 23(17):6819-6825.
42. Pelphrey K.A., Morris J.P., Michelich C.R., Allison T., McCarthy G. Functional anatomy of biological motion perception in posterior temporal cortex: an fMRI study of eye, mouth and hand movements. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15(12):1866-1876.
43. Peuskens H., Vanrie J., Verfaillie K., Orban G.A. Specificity of regions processing biological motion. European Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 21(10):2864-2875.
44. Puce A., Perrett D. Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 2003, 358(1431):435-445.
45. Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2004, 27:169-192.
46. Rizzolatti G., Fabbri-Destro M. The mirror system and its role in social cognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2008, 18(2):179-184.
47. Sallet J., Mars R.B., Noonan M.P., Andersson J.L., O'Reilly J.X., Jbabdi S., et al. Social network size affects neural circuits in macaques. Science 2011, 334(6056):697-700. 10.1126/science.1210027.
48. Saygin A.P. Superior temporal and premotor brain areas necessary for biological motion perception. Brain 2007, 130:2452-2461.
49. Saygin, A. P. (in press). Biological motion perception and the brain: Neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies. In K. Johnson & M. Shiffrar (Eds.), Visual perception of the human body in motion findings, theory, and practice: Oxford University Press.
50. Saygin A.P., Cook J., Blakemore S.J. Unaffected perceptual thresholds for biological and non-biological form-from-motion perception in autism spectrum conditions. PLoS One 2010, 5(10):e13491.
51. Saygin A.P., Wilson S.M., Hagler D.J., Bates E., Sereno M.I. Point-light biological motion perception activates human premotor cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 24(27):6181-6188.
52. Schwarzkopf D.S., Song C., Rees G. The surface area of human V1 predicts the subjective experience of object size. Nature Neuroscience 2011, 14(1):28-30.
53. Treutwein B. Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Vision Research 1995, 35(17):2503-2522.
54. Vaina L.M., Solomon J., Chowdhury S., Sinha P., Belliveau J.W. Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2001, 98(20):11656-11661.
55. van Kemenade B., Muggleton N., Walsh V., Saygin A.P. The effects of TMS over STS and premotor cortex on the perception of biological motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2012, 24(4):896-904.
56. Vogel E.K., Awh E. How to exploit diversity for scientific gain: using individual differences to constrain cognitive theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2008, 17(2):171-176.
57. von dem Hagen E.A., Nummenmaa L., Yu R., Engell A.D., Ewbank M.P., Calder A.J. Autism spectrum traits in the typical population predict structure and function in the posterior superior temporal sulcus. Cerebral Cortex 2011, 21(3):493-500. 10.1093/cercor/bhq062.
58. Watson A.B., Pelli D.G. QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception & Psychophysics 1983, 33(2):113-120.
59. Wyk B.C., Hudac C.M., Carter E.J., Sobel D.M., Pelphrey K.A. Action understanding in the superior temporal sulcus region. Psychological Science 2009, 20(6):771-777.