Brain activity for peripheral biological motion in the posterior superior temporal gyrus and the fusiform gyrus: Dependence on visual hemifield and view orientation

NeuroImage

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 151-159

  Michels, Lars ^a,e   Kleiser, Raimund ^c,d   de Lussanet, Marc H E ^a,b   Seitz, Rüdiger J ^c,d   Lappe, Markus ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience   (Germany)

^c HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d Brain Imaging Center West   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Biological motion; Contralateral organization; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Fusiform gyrus; pSTG

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CINGULATE GYRUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGING; MALE; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PERIPHERAL VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT; ORIENTATION; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 60349123290     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.063     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Beauchamp M.S., Lee K.E., Haxby J.V., and Martin A. fMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects. J. Cog. Neurosci. 15 (2003) 991-1007
2. Beintema J.A., and Lappe M. Perception of biological motion without local image motion. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99 (2002) 5661-5663
3. Beintema J.A., Georg K., and Lappe M. Perception of biological motion from limited lifetime stimuli. Perc. Psychophys. 68 (2006) 613-624
4. Benjamini Y., and Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach of multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc., Ser. B 57 (1995) 289-300
5. Bonda E., Petrides M., Ostry D., and Evans A. Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion. J. Neurosci. 16 (1996) 3737-3744
6. Bruce C., Desimone R., and Gross C.G. Visual properties of neurons in a polysensory area in superior temporal sulcus of the macaque. J. Neurophysiol. 46 (1981) 369-384
7. Buccino G., Binkofski F., Fink G.R., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Seitz R.J., Zilles K., Rizzolatti G., and Freund H.J. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 13 (2001) 400-404
8. de Lussanet M.H.E., Fadiga L., Michels L., Seitz R.J., Kleiser R., and Lappe M. Interaction of visual hemifield and body view in biological motion perception. Eur. J. Neurosci. 27 (2008) 514-522
9. Downing P.E., Jiang Y., Shuman M., and Kanwisher N. A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science 293 (2001) 2470-2473
10. Engel S., Glover G., and Wandell B. Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI. Cereb. Cortex 7 (1997) 181-192
11. Epstein R., Harris A., Stanley D., and Kanwisher N. The parahippocampal place area: recognition, navigation, or encoding?. Neuron 23 (1999) 115-125
12. Gauthier I., Tarr M.J., Moylan J., Skudlarski P., Gore J.C., and Anderson W.A. The fusiform 'face area' is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. J. Cog. Neurosci. 12 (2000) 495-504
13. Genovese C.R., Lazar N.A., and Nichols T.E. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. NeuroImage 15 (2002) 870-878
14. Giese M.A. Neural model for biological movement recognition: a neurophysiologically plausible theory. In: Vaina L.M., Beardsley S.A., and Rushton S. (Eds). Optic Flow and Beyond (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, NL 443-470
15. Grèzes J., Costes N., and Decety J. Top-down effect of strategy on the perception of human biological motion: a PET investigation. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 15 (1998) 553-582
16. Grèzes J., Fonlupt P., Bertenthal B., Delon-Martin C., Segebarth C., and Decety J. Does perception of biological motion rely on specific brain regions?. NeuroImage 13 (2001) 775-785
17. Grossman E.D., and Blake R. Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion. Vis. Res. 41 (2001) 1475-1482
18. Grossman E.D., and Blake R. Brain areas active during visual perception of biological motion. Neuron 35 (2002) 1167-1175
19. Grossman E.D., and Blake R. Learning to see biological motion: brain activity parallels behavior. J. Cog. Neurosci. 16 (2004) 1669-1679
20. Grossman E.D., Donnelly M., Price R., Pickens D., Morgan V., Neighbor G., and Blake R. Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. J. Cog. Neurosci. 12 (2000) 711-720
21. Grossman E.D., Battelli L., and Pascual-Leone A. Repetitive TMS over posterior STS disrupts perception of biological motion. Vis. Res. 45 (2005) 2847-2853
22. Hemond C., Kanwisher N., and Op de Beeck H. A preference for contralateral stimuli in human object and face-selective cortex. PLoS ONE 2 (2007) e574 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000574
23. Holmes A., and Friston K. Generalisability, random effects and population inference. NeuroImage 7 (1998) S754
24. Howard R.J., Brammer M., Wright I., Woodruff P.W., Bullmore E.T., and Zeki S. A direct demonstration of functional specialization within motion-related visual and auditory cortex of the human brain. Curr. Biol. 6 (1996) 1015-1019
25. Huk A.C., Dougherty R.F., and Heeger D.J. Retinotopy and functional subdivision of human areas MT and MST. J. Neurosci. 22 (2002) 7195-7205
26. Ikeda H., Blake R., and Watanabe K. Eccentric perception of biological motion is unscalably poor. Vis. Res. 45 (2005) 1935-1943
27. Jellema T., Maassen G., and Perrett D.I. Single cell integration of animate form, motion and location in the superior temporal cortex of the macaque monkey. Cereb. Cortex 14 (2004) 781-790
28. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept. Psychophys. 14 (1973) 201-211
29. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., and Chun M. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J. Neurosci. 17 (1997) 4302-4311
30. Lange J., and Lappe M. A model of biological motion perception from configural form cues. J. Neurosci. 26 (2006) 2894-2906
31. Lange J., Georg K., and Lappe M. Visual perception of biological motion by form: a template-matching analysis. J. Vis. 6 (2006) 836-849
32. Logothetis N.K., Guggenberger H., Peled S., and Pauls J. Functional imaging of the monkey brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2 (1999) 555-562
33. Mai J.K., Assheuer J.K., and Paxinos G. Atlas of the Human Brain. 2nd edition (2005), Elsevier / Academic Press, Amsterdam
34. Michels L., Lappe M., and Vaina L.M. Visual areas involved in the perception of human movement from dynamic form analysis. NeuroReport 16 (2005) 1037-1041
35. Oram M.W., and Perrett D.I. Responses of anterior superior temporal polysensory area STPa neurons to 'biological motion' stimuli. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 6 (1994) 99-116
36. Oram M.W., and Perrett D.I. Integration of form and motion in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area STPa of the macaque monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 76 (1996) 109-129
37. Peelen M.V., and Downing P.E. Selectivity for the human body in the fusiform gyrus. J. Neurophysiol. 93 (2005) 603-608
38. Peelen M.V., Wiggett A.J., and Downing P.E. Patterns of fMRI activity dissociate overlapping functional brain areas that respond to biological motion. Neuron 49 (2006) 815-822 doi:10.1016/j.neurron.2006.02.004
39. Pelphrey K., Morris J., Michelich C., Allison T., and McCarthy G. Functional anatomy of biological motion perception in posterior temporal cortex: an fMRI study of eye, mouth and hand movements. Cereb. Cortex 15 (2005) 1866-1876
40. Pelphrey K.A., Mitchell T.V., McKeown M.J., Goldstein J., Allison T., and McCarthy G. Brain activity evoked by the perception of human walking: controlling for meaningful coherent motion. J. Neurosci. 23 (2003) 6819-6825
41. Perrett D., Oram M.W., Harries M.H., Bevan R., Hietanen J.K., Benson P.J., and Thomas S. Viewer-centred and object-centred coding of heads in the macaque temporal cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 86 (1991) 159-173
42. Perrett D.I., May K.A., and Yoshikawa S. Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature 368 (1994) 239-242
43. Peuskens H., Vanrie J., Verfaillie K., and Orban G.A. Specificity of regions processing biological motion. Eur. J. Neurosci. 21 (2005) 2864-2875
44. Pinsk M.A., DeSimone K., Moore T., Gross C.G., and Kastner S. Representations of faces and body parts in macaque temporal cortex: a functional MRI study. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (2005) 6996-7001
45. Ptito M., Faubert J., Gjedde A., and Kupers R. Separate neural pathways for contour and biological-motion cues in motion-defined animal shapes. NeuroImage 19 (2003) 246-252
46. Puce A., Allison T., Bentin S., Gore J.C., and McCarthy G. Temporal cortex activation in humans viewing eye and mouth movements. J. Neurosci. 18 (1998) 2188-2199
47. Rodieck R.W. The First Steps in Seeing (1998), Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland MA
48. Santi A., Servos P., Vatikiotis-Bateson E., Kuratate T., and Munhall K. Perceiving biological motion: dissociating visible speech from walking. J. Cog. Neurosci. 15 (2003) 800-809
49. Saygin A.P., Wilson S.M., Hagler Jr. D.J., Bates E., and Sereno M.I. Point-light biological motion perception activates human premotor cortex. J. Neurosci. 24 (2004) 6181-6188
50. Sereno M.I., Dale A.M., Reppas J.B., Kwong K.K., Belliveau J.W., Brady T.J., Rosen B.R., and Tootell R.B.H. Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science 268 (1995) 889-893
51. Servos P., Osu R., Santi A., and Kawato M. The neural substrates of biological motion perception: an fMRI study. Cereb. Cortex 12 (2002) 772-782
52. Shmuelof L., and Zohary E. Dissociation between ventral and dorsal fMRI activation during object and action recognition. Neuron 47 3 (2005) 457-470
53. Tai Y.F., Scherer C., Brooks D.J., Sawamoto N., and Castiello U. The human premotor cortex is 'mirror' only for biological actions. Curr. Biol. 14 (2004) 117-120
54. Talairach J., and Tournoux P. Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain (1988), Thieme, New York
55. Tanaka K. Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 19 (1996) 109-139
56. Thompson B., Hansen B.C., Hess R.F., and Troje N.F. Peripheral vision: good for biological motion, bad for signal noise segregation?. J. Vis. 7 10 (2007) 1-7 doi: 10.1167/7.10.12
57. Thompson J.C., Clarke M., Stewart T., and Puce A. Configural processing of biological motion in human superior temporal sulcus. J. Neurosci. 25 (2005) 9059-9066
58. Tsao D.Y., Freiwald W.A., Knutsen T.A., Mandeville J.B., and Tootell R.B. Faces and objects in macaque cerebral cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 6 (2003) 989-995
59. Vaina L.M., Solomon J., Chowdhury S., Sinha P., and Belliveau J.W. Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98 (2001) 11656-11661
60. Wang G., Tanifuji M., and Tanaka K. Fuctional architecture in monkey inferotemporal cortex revealed by in vivo optical imaging. Neurosci. Res. 32 (1998) 33-46
61. Wheaton K.J., Thompson J.C., Syngeniotis A., Abbott D.F., and Puce A. Viewing the motion of human body parts activates different regions of premotor, temporal, and parietal cortex. NeuroImage 22 (2004) 277-288