Effects of Context on Visuomotor Interference Depends on the Perspective of Observed Actions

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Bortoletto, Marta ^a   Mattingley, Jason B ^b   Cunnington, Ross ^b  

^a IRCCS ISTITUTO CENTRO SAN GIOVANNI DI DIO FATEBENEFRATELLI   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; GESTURE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE DISPLAY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVATION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; RESPONSE TIME; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL ALLOCENTRIC PERSPECTIVE; VISUAL EGOCENTRIC PERSPECTIVE; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR INTERFERENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ATTENTION; COGNITION; CUES; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; GESTURES; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISION, OCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84871862801     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053248     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Heyes C, (2011) Automatic imitation. Psychological Bulletin 137: 463-483.
2. Craighero L, Bello A, Fadiga L, Rizzolatti G, (2002) Hand action preparation influences the responses to hand pictures. Neuropsychologia 40: 492-502.
3. Vogt S, Taylor P, Hopkins B, (2003) Visuomotor priming by pictures of hand postures: perspective matters. Neuropsychologia 41: 941-951.
4. Spengler S, Brass M, Kühn S, Schütz-Bosbach S, (2010) Minimizing motor mimicry by myself: self-focus enhances online action-control mechanisms during motor contagion. Consciousness and Cognition 19: 98-106.
5. Caspers S, Zilles K, Laird AR, Eickhoff SB, (2010) ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain. Neuroimage 50: 1148-1167.
6. Grèzes J, Decety J, (2001) Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping 12: 1-19.
7. Molenberghs P, Cunnington R, Mattingley JB, (2012) Brain regions with mirror properties: A meta-analysis of 125 human fMRI studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 36: 341-349.
8. Rizzolatti G, Sinigaglia C, (2010) The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11: 264-274.
9. Kilner JM, Friston KJ, Frith CD, (2007) Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system. Cognitive Processing 8: 159-166.
10. Friston K, Mattout J, Kilner J (2011) Action understanding and active inference. Biological Cybernetics: 137-160.
11. Iacoboni M, (1999) Cortical Mechanisms of Human Imitation. Science 286: 2526-2528.
12. Wolpert DM, (1997) Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1: 209-216.
13. James W (1890) Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
14. Hommel B, Müsseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W, (2001) The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 849-937.
15. Prinz W (2005) An ideomotor approach to imitation. In: H S, C N, editors. Perspective on imitation: from neuroscience to social science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 141-156.
16. Halász V, Cunnington R, (2012) Unconscious Effects of Action on Perception. Brain Sciences 2: 130-146.
17. Kilner JM, Neal A, Weiskopf N, Friston KJ, Frith CD, (2009) Evidence of mirror neurons in human inferior frontal gyrus. The Journal of Neuroscience 29: 10153-10159.
18. Chong TT-J, Cunnington R, Williams MA, Kanwisher N, Mattingley JB, (2008) fMRI adaptation reveals mirror neurons in human inferior parietal cortex. Current Biology 18: 1576-1580.
19. Lingnau A, Gesierich B, Caramazza A, (2009) Asymmetric fMRI adaptation reveals no evidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 9925-9930.
20. Bortoletto M, Mattingley JB, Cunnington R, (2011) Action intentions modulate visual processing during action perception. Neuropsychologia 49: 2097-2104.
21. Press C, Gherri E, Heyes C, Eimer M, (2010) Action preparation helps and hinders perception of action. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22: 2198-2211.
22. Cattaneo L, Barchiesi G, Tabarelli D, Arfeller C, Sato M, et al. (2010) One's motor performance predictably modulates the understanding of others' actions through adaptation of premotor visuo-motor neurons. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.
23. Chong TT-J, Cunnington R, Williams MA, Mattingley JB, (2009) The role of selective attention in matching observed and executed actions. Neuropsychologia 47: 786-795.
24. Bach P, Peatfield NA, Tipper SP, (2007) Focusing on body sites: the role of spatial attention in action perception. Experimental Brain Research 178: 509-517.
25. Oberman LM, Pineda JA, Ramachandran VS, (2007) The human mirror neuron system: a link between action observation and social skills. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2: 62-66.
26. Perry A, Stein L, Bentin S, (2011) Motor and attentional mechanisms involved in social interaction-evidence from mu and alpha EEG suppression. Neuroimage 58: 895-904.
27. Longo MR, Kosobud A, Bertenthal BI, (2008) Automatic imitation of biomechanically possible and impossible actions: effects of priming movements versus goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 34: 489-501.
28. Longo MR, Bertenthal BI, (2009) Attention modulates the specificity of automatic imitation to human actors. Experimental Brain Research 192: 739-744.
29. Schuch S, Bayliss AP, Klein C, Tipper SP, (2010) Attention modulates motor system activation during action observation: evidence for inhibitory rebound. Experimental Brain Research 205: 235-249.
30. Ocampo B, Kritikos A, (2010) Placing actions in context: motor facilitation following observation of identical and non-identical manual acts. Experimental Brain Research 201: 743-751.
31. Molenberghs P, Hayward L, Mattingley JB, Cunnington R, (2011) Activation patterns during action observation are modulated by context in mirror system areas. Neuroimage 59: 608-615.
32. Jackson PL, Meltzoff AN, Decety J, (2006) Neural circuits involved in imitation and perspective-taking. Neuroimage 31: 429-439.
33. Hesse MD, Sparing R, Fink GR, (2008) End or Means - The "'What'" and "'How '"of Observed Intentional Actions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21: 776-790.
34. Watanabe R, Watanabe S, Kuruma H, Murakami Y, Seno A, (2011) Neural activation during imitation of movements presented from four different perspectives?: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience Letters 503: 100-104.
35. Bruzzo A, Borghi AM, Ghirlanda S, (2008) Hand - object interaction in perspective. Neuroscience Letters 441: 61-65.
36. Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Pavesi G, Rizzolatti G, (1995) Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology 73: 2608-2611.
37. Maeda F, Kleiner-Fisman G, Pascual-Leone A, (2002) Motor facilitation while observing hand actions: specificity of the effect and role of observer's orientation. Journal of Neurophysiology 87: 1329-1335.
38. Alaerts K, Heremans E, Swinnen SP, Wenderoth N, (2009) How are observed actions mapped to the observer ' s motor system? Influence of posture and perspective. Neuropsychologia 47: 415-422.
39. Kornblum S, Hasbroucq T, Osman A, (1990) Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility- A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review 97: 253-270.
40. Hétu S, Mercier C, Eugène F, Michon P-E, Jackson PL, (2011) Modulation of brain activity during action observation: influence of perspective, transitivity and meaningfulness. PloS One 6: e24728.
41. Ogawa K, Inui T, (2011) Neural representation of observed actions in the parietal and premotor cortex. Neuroimage 56: 728-735.
42. Bertenthal BI, Longo MR, Kosobud A, (2006) Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 32: 210-225.
43. Press C, Bird G, Walsh E, Heyes C, (2008) Automatic imitation of intransitive actions. Brain and Cognition 67: 44-50.
44. Catmur C, Heyes C, (2011) Time course analyses confirm independence of imitative and spatial compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 37: 409-421.
45. Schütz-Bosbach S, Mancini B, Aglioti SM, Haggard P, (2006) Self and other in the human motor system. Current Biology 16: 1830-1834.
46. Schütz-Bosbach S, Avenanti A, Aglioti SM, Haggard P, (2009) Don't do it! Cortical inhibition and self-attribution during action observation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21: 1215-1227.
47. David N, Bewernick BH, Cohen MX, Newen A, Lux S, et al. (2006) Neural representations of self versus other: visual-spatial perspective taking and agency in a virtual ball-tossing game. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18: 898-910.
48. Obhi SS, Hogeveen J, Pascual-Leone A, (2011) Resonating with others: the effects of self-construal type on motor cortical output. The Journal of Neuroscience 31: 14531-14535.
49. Oosterhof NN, Tipper SP, Downing PE, (2012) Viewpoint (In)dependence of Action Representations: An MVPA Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24: 975-989.
50. Strafella AP, Paus T, (2000) Modulation of cortical excitability during action observation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Neuroreport 11: 2289-2292.
51. Buccino G, Solodkin A, Small SL, (2006) Functions of the mirror neuron system: implications for neurorehabilitation. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology 19: 55-63.
52. Mulder T, (2007) Motor imagery and action observation: cognitive tools for rehabilitation. Journal of Neural Transmission 114: 1265-1278.
53. Pomeroy VM, Clark CA, Miller JSG, Baron J-C, Markus HS, et al. (2005) The potential for utilizing the "mirror neurone system" to enhance recovery of the severely affected upper limb early after stroke: a review and hypothesis. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 19: 4-13.