New parameter for the evaluation of disgnathic patient's surgical planning: A preliminary report

European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences

Volumn 16, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1430-1432

  Filiaci, F ^a   Ramieri, V ^a   Fatone, F M G ^a   Gennaro, P ^a   Arangio, P ^a   Rinna, C ^a   Vellone, V ^a   Agrillo, A ^a   Ungari, C ^a   Cascone, P ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cephalometry; Clinical evaluation; Familiarity; Maxillo mandibular malformation

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMETRIC PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CLINICAL EVALUATION; FACIAL HEIGHT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; JAW MALFORMATION; MAXILLOMANDIBULAR MALFORMATION; NASOLABIAL ANGLE; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERPENDICULAR TO THE NATURAL HORIZONTAL HEAD POSITION; PHOTOGRAPHY; SUBNASALE; UPPER INCISOR EDGE; UPPER LIP ANGLE; UPPER LIP VERTICAL DIMENSION; VERTICAL DIMENSION OF THE LOWER LIP; VERTICAL MANDIBULAR DIMENSION; VERTICAL MAXILLARY DIMENSION; ESTHETICS; MANDIBLE RECONSTRUCTION; METHODOLOGY;

CEPHALOMETRY; ESTHETICS; HUMANS; MANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION; PATIENT SATISFACTION;

EID: 84871860846     PISSN: 11283602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. KEROSUO H, HAUSEN H, LAINE T, SHAW WC. The influence of incisai malocclusion on the social attractiveness of young adults in Finland. Eur J Orthod 1995; 17: 505-512.
2. SHAW WC. The influence of children's dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod 1985; 87: 21-16.
3. SENNA A, ABBENANTE D, TREMOLIZZO L, CAMPUS G, STROHMENGER L. The relationship between facial skeletal class and expert-rated interpersonal skill: an epidemiological survey on young Italian adults. BMC Psychiatry 2006; 6: 41 -47.
4. CUNNINGHAM. The psychology of the appearance. Dent Update 1999; 26: 438-443.
5. GIDDON DB. Oral health and the quality of life. J Am Coll Dent 1987; 54: 10-15.
6. PATNAIK WG, SINGLA RAJAN K, BALA S. Anatomy of a beautiful face & smile. J Anat Soc India 2003; 52: 74-80.
7. ARNETT GW JELIC JS, KIM J, CUMMINGS DR, BERESS A, WORLEY MD JR, CHUNG B, BERGMAN R. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: Diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116: 239-253.
8. WOLDORF LM, FIELDS RT. Surgical planning. In: Booth PW, Schendel SA, Hausamen JE, eds. Maxillofacial surgery. London, Churchill Livingstone, 1999: pp. 849-861.
9. EDGERTON MT, KNORR MJ. Motivation patterns of patients seeking cosmetic (aesthetic) surgery. Plastic Reconstr Surg 1971; 48: 551 -557.
10. GOLDSTEIN RE. Esthetic dentistry-a health service? J Dent Res 1993; 72: 641-642.
11. LANGLOIS JH, ROGGMAN LA, CASEY RH. Infant preference for attractive faces: rudiments of a stereotype. Dev Psych 1987; 23: 363-369.
12. VARGO JK, GLADWING M, NGAN P. Association between ratings of facial attractivess and patients' motivation for orthognathic surgery. Orthod Craniofacial Res 2003; 6: 63-71.
13. GOLDSTEIN RE. Esthetics in dentistry. 2nd Ed Vol. 1. Decker, Toronto, 1998.
14. BELL R, KIYAK HA, JOONDEPH DR, MCNEILL RV, WALLEN TR. Perceptions of facial profile and their influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod 1985; 88: 323-332.
15. KERR WJS, O'DONNELL JM. Panel perceptions of facial attractiveness. Brit J Orthop 1990; 17: 299-304.
16. SADEK H, SALEM G. Psychological aspects of orthognathic surgery and its effect on quality of life in egyptian patients. East Mediterr Health J 2007; 13: 150-159.
17. CUNNINGHAM M. Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. J Personal Social Psychol 1986; 50: 925-935.