The relationship between facial skeletal class and expert-rated interpersonal skill: An epidemiological survey on young Italian adults

BMC Psychiatry

Volumn 6, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Senna, Andrea ^a,b   Abbenante, Domenico ^c   Tremolizzo, Lucio ^d   Campus, Guglielmo ^e   Strohmenger, Laura ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b WHO Collaborating Centre of Milan for Epidemiology and Community Dentistry   (Italy)

^c Guidonia Aeromedical Selection Centre   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SASSARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESTHETICS; FACE PROFILE; FACIES; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; HYPOTHESIS; ITALY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL EXPERT; MILITARY SERVICE; MINNESOTA MULTIPHASIC PERSONALITY INVENTORY; ORTHODONTICS; PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; RATING SCALE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; BEAUTY; CEPHALOMETRY; DATA COLLECTION; EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES; ESTHETICS; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; ITALY; MALE; SELF CONCEPT; SEX FACTORS; SKULL;

EID: 33750421861     PISSN: 1471244X     EISSN: 1471244X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-6-41     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Berscheid E, Walster E: Beauty and the best. Psychol Today 1972, 5:42-46.
2. Campbell A: Female competition: causes, constraints, content, and contexts. J Sex Res 2004, 41:16-26.
3. Dion K, Berscheid E, Walster E: What is beautiful is good. J Pers Soc Psychol 1972, 24:285-90.
4. Efran MC: The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. J Res Personality 1974, 8:45-54.
5. Jefferson Y: Skeletal types: key to unraveling the mystery of facial beauty and its biologic significance. J Gen Orthod 1996, 7:7-25.
6. Kerosuo H, Hausen H, Laine T, Shaw WC: The influence of incisal malocclusion on the social attractiveness of young adults in Finland. Eur J Orthod 1995, 17:505-512.
7. Mantel N: Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom; extensions of the Mantel-Haensze procedure. J Am Stat Ass 1963, 58:690-700.
8. Marcus DK, Miller RS: Sex differences in judgments of physical attractiveness: a social relations analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2003, 29:325-335.
9. Michiels G, Sather AH: Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1994, 9:95-103.
10. Miller AG: Role of physical attractiveness in impression formation. Psychonomic Science 1970, 19:241-243.
11. Morabito A. Luglie PF, Columbano M, Mannias O: The Steiner-Cervera cephalometric evaluation. Mondo Ortod 1982, 7:23-26.
12. Patzer GL: Understanding the causal relationship between physical attractiveness and self-esteem. J Esthet Dent 1996, 8: 144-147.
13. Sellbom M, Ben-Porath YS, Graham JR, Arbisi PA, Bagby RM: Susceptibility of the MMPI-2 clinical, restructured clinical (RC), and content scales to overreporting and underreporting. Assessment 2005, 12:79-85.
14. Sergi HG, Stodt W: Experimental investigation of the aesthetic effect of various tooth positions after loss of an incisor tooth. Rep Congr Eur Orthod Soc 1970:497-507.
15. Shaw WC, Addy M, Ray C: Dental and social effects of malocclusion and effectiveness of orthodontic treatment: a review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1980, 8:36-45.
16. Shaw WC: The influence of children's dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod 1981, 79:399-415.
17. Shaw WC, Rees G, Dawe M, Charles CR: The influence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults. Am J Orthod 1985, 87:21-26.