Comparison of noninvasive devices for assessing central blood pressure parameters: What to compare, when and why

Journal of Hypertension

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 27-31

  Cameron, James D ^a  

^a MONASH MEDICAL CENTRE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE PRESSURE; REVIEW; SPHYGMOMANOMETER; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

EID: 84871844375     PISSN: 02636352     EISSN: 14735598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835c0de8     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Pucci G, Cheriyan J, Hubsch A, Hickson SS, Gajendragadkar PR, Watson T, et al. Evaluation of the Vicorder, a novel cuff-based device for the noninvasive estimation of central blood pressure. J Hypertens 2013; 31:77-85.
2. Ding F-H, Li Y, Zhang R-Y, Zhang Q, Wang J-G. Comparison of the SphygmoCor and Omron devices in the estimation of pressure amplification against the invasive catheter measurement. J Hypertens 2013; 31:86-93.
3. Weiss W, Gohlisch C, Harsch-Gladisch C, Tölle M, Zidek W, van der Giet M. Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure: validation of the Mobil-O-Graph in comparison with the SphygmoCor device. Blood Press Monit 2012; 17:128-131.
4. Brett SE, Guilcher A, Clapp B, Chowienczyk P. Estimating central systolic blood pressure during oscillometric determination of blood pressure: proof of concept and validation by comparison with intraaortic pressure recording and arterial tonometry. Blood Press Monit 2012; 17:132-136.
5. Climie RE, Schultz MG, Nikolic SB, Ahuja KD, Fell JW, Sharman JE. Validity and reliability of central blood pressure estimated by upper arm oscillometric cuff pressure. Am J Hypertens 2012; 25:414-420; doi: 10.1038/ajh.2011.238.
6. Ding FH, Fan WX, Zhang RY, Zhang Q, Li Y, Wang JG. Validation of the noninvasive assessment of central blood pressure by the SphygmoCor and Omron devices against the invasive catheter measurement. Am J Hypertens 2011; 24:1306-1311.
7. Weber T, Wassertheurer S, Rammer M, Maurer E, Hametner B, Mayer CC, et al. Validation of a brachial cuff-based method for estimating central systolic blood pressure. Hypertension 2011; 58:825-832.
8. Horvàth IG, Németh A, Lenkey Z, Alessandri N, Tufano F, Kis P, et al. Invasive validation of a new oscillometric device (Arteriograph) for measuring augmentation index, central blood pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens 2010; 28:2068-2075.
9. Zuo JL, Li Y, Yan ZJ, Zhang RY, Shen WF, Zhu DL, et al. Validation of the central blood pressure estimation by the SphygmoCor system in Chinese. Blood Press Monit 2010; 15:268-274.
10. Cheng HM, Wang KL, Chen YH, Lin SJ, Chen LC, Sung SH, et al. Estimation of central systolic blood pressure using an oscillometric blood pressure monitor. Hypertens Res 2010; 33:592-599.
11. Rezai MR, Goudot G, Winters C, Finn JD, Wu FC, Cruickshank JK. Calibration mode influences central blood pressure differences between SphygmoCor and two newer devices, the Arteriograph and Omron HEM-9000. Hypertens Res 2011; 34:1046-1051.
12. Hope SA, Meredith IT, Cameron JD. Effect of noninvasive calibration of radial waveforms on error in transfer function-derived central aortic waveform characteristics. Clin Sci (Lond) 2004; 107:205-211.
13. Cloud GC, Rajkumar C, Kooner J, Cooke J, Bulpitt CJ. Estimation of central aortic pressure by SphygmoCor requires intra-arterial peripheral pressures. Clin Sci 2003; 105:219-225.
14. Hope SA, Meredith IT, Tay D, Cameron JD. 'Generalisability' of a radialaortic transfer function for the derivation of central aortic waveform parameters. J Hypertens 2007; 25:1812-1820.
15. Cameron JD. Assessment of central blood pressure waveforms: let the buyer beware: different approaches result in different results. Hypertens Res 2011; 34:994-995.
16. Benetos A, Gautier S, Labat C, Salvi P, Valbusa F, Marino F, et al. Mortality and cardiovascular events are best predicted by low central/peripheral pulse pressure amplification but not by high blood pressure levels in elderly nursing home subjects: The PARTAGE (Predictive Values of Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness in Institutionalized Very Aged Population) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60:1503-1511.