ACR appropriateness criteria® radiographically detected solitary pulmonary nodule

Journal of Thoracic Imaging

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Kanne, Jeffrey P ^a   Jensen, Leif E ^a   Mohammed, Tan Lucien H ^b   Kirsch, Jacobo ^b   Amorosa, Judith K ^c   Brown, Kathleen ^d   Chung, Jonathan H ^e   Dyer, Debra Sue ^e   Ginsburg, Mark E ^f   Heitkamp, Darel E ⁱ   Kazerooni, Ella A ^j   Ketai, Loren H ^k   Parker, J Anthony ^l   Ravenel, James G ^m   Saleh, Anthony G ^g   Shah, Rakesh D ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^g NEW YORK METHODIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

^h NORTH SHORE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

ⁱ INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^l BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^m MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

appropriateness criteria; biopsy; computerized tomography; positron emission tomography; pulmonary nodule

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18;

ATELECTASIS; BRONCHOSCOPY; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DELPHI STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LUNG ADENOCARCINOMA; LUNG CANCER; LUNG NODULE; LUNG PARENCHYMA; LYMPHADENOPATHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW; THORACOTOMY; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; TRANSTHORACIC ASPIRATION; TUMOR VOLUME; VIDEO ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY;

CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOLOGY; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84871799932     PISSN: 08835993     EISSN: 15360237     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e31827657c8     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, et al. Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology. 2008;246:697-722.
2. Lillington GA. Disease-a-Month. 37th ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1991:271-318.
3. Godoy MC, Naidich DP. Subsolid pulmonary nodules and the spectrum of peripheral adenocarcinomas of the lung: recommended interim guidelines for assessment and management. Radiology. 2009;253:606-622.
4. Brandman S, Ko JP. Pulmonary nodule detection, characterization, and management with multidetector computed tomography. J Thorac Imaging. 2011;26:90-105.
5. Gurney JW. Determining the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with Bayesian analysis. Part I. Theory. Radiology. 1993;186:405-413.
6. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mateescu I, et al. Neural networks for the analysis of small pulmonary nodules. Clin Imaging. 1997;21:390-399.
7. Nakamura K, Yoshida H, Engelmann R, et al. Computerized analysis of the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with use of artificial neural networks. Radiology. 2000;214:823-830.
8. Swensen SJ, Silverstein MD, Ilstrup DM, et al. The probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules. Application to small radiologically indeterminate nodules. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:849-855.
9. Truong MT, Sabloff BS, Ko JP. Multidetector CT of solitary pulmonary nodules. Radiol Clin North Am. 2010;48:141-155.
10. Matsuki Y, Nakamura K, Watanabe H, et al. Usefulness of an artificial neural network for differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary nodules on high-resolution CT: evaluation with receiver operating characteristic analysis. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:657-663.
11. de Hoop B, Gietema H, van de Vorst S, et al. Pulmonary ground-glass nodules: increase in mass as an early indicator of growth. Radiology. 2010;255:199-206.
12. Kostis WJ, Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, et al. Small pulmonary nodules: reproducibility of three-dimensional volumetric measurement and estimation of time to follow-up CT. Radiology. 2004;231:446-452.
13. Swensen SJ, Viggiano RW, Midthun DE, et al. Lung nodule enhancement at CT: multicenter study. Radiology. 2000;214: 73-80.
14. Jeong YJ, Lee KS, Jeong SY, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodule: characterization with combined wash-in and washout features at dynamic multi-detector row CT. Radiology. 2005;237: 675-683.
15. Chae EJ, Song JW, Seo JB, et al. Clinical utility of dual-energy CT in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules: initial experience. Radiology. 2008;249:671-681.
16. Kang MJ, Park CM, Lee CH, et al. Dual-energy CT: clinical applications in various pulmonary diseases. Radiographics. 2010;30:685-698.
17. Schroeder T, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF, et al. Detection of pulmonary nodules using a 2D HASTE MR sequence: comparison with MDCT. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:979-984.
18. Kim JH, Kim HJ, Lee KH, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodules: a comparative study evaluated with contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging and CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004;28:766-775.
19. Schaefer JF, Vollmar J, Schick F, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodules: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging-perfusion differences in malignant and benign lesions. Radiology. 2004;232:544-553.
20. Kono R, Fujimoto K, Terasaki H, et al. Dynamic MRI of solitary pulmonary nodules: comparison of enhancement patterns of malignant and benign small peripheral lung lesions. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:26-36.
21. Mavi A, Lakhani P, Zhuang H, et al. Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET in characterizing solitary pulmonary nodules, assessing pleural diseases, and the initial staging, restaging, therapy planning, and monitoring response of lung cancer. Radiol Clin North Am. 2005;43:1-21, ix.
22. Christensen JA, Nathan MA, Mullan BP, et al. Characterization of the solitary pulmonary nodule: 18F-FDG PET versus nodule-enhancement CT. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187: 1361-1367.
23. Geraghty PR, Kee ST, McFarlane G, et al. CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of pulmonary nodules: needle size and pneumothorax rate. Radiology. 2003;229: 475-481.
24. Wallace MJ, Krishnamurthy S, Broemeling LD, et al. CTguided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy of small
25. Westcott JL. Needle biopsy of the chest. In: Tavares J, Ferruci J, eds. Imaging-Diagnosis-Intervention. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott; 1993:1-3.
26. Yankelevitz DF, Wisnivesky JP, Henschke CI. Comparison of biopsy techniques in assessment of solitary pulmonary nodules. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2000;21:139-148.
27. Baaklini WA, Reinoso MA, Gorin AB, et al. Diagnostic yield of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in evaluating solitary pulmonary nodules. Chest. 2000;117:1049-1054.
28. MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, et al. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2005;237:395-400.
29. Gould MK, Fletcher J, Iannettoni MD, et al. Evaluation of patients with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer?: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007;132(suppl):108S-130S.