Dynamic MRI of solitary pulmonary nodules: Comparison of enhancement patterns of malignant and benign small peripheral lung lesions

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 188, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 26-36

  Kono, Rei ^a   Fujimoto, Kiminori ^a   Terasaki, Hiroshi ^a   Müller, Nestor L ^b   Kato, Seiya ^a   Sadohara, Junko ^a   Hayabuchi, Naofumi ^a   Takamori, Shinzo ^a  

^a KURUME UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Chest; Dynamic MRI; Infectious disease; Lung disease; Oncologic imaging

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; BENIGN TUMOR; BOLUS INJECTION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HAMARTOMA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LUNG CANCER; LUNG DISEASE; LUNG NODULE; LUNG TUMOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ONCOLOGY; PNEUMONIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; THORAX; TUBERCULOMA; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COIN LESION, PULMONARY; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33845776623     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.1446     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin 2004; 54:8-29
2. Hurria A, Kris MG. Management of lung cancer in older adults. CA Cancer J Clin 2003; 53:325-341
3. Ost D, Fein AM, Feinsilver SH. The solitary pulmonary nodule. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:2535-2542
4. Siegelman SS, Khouri NF, Leo FP, Fishman EK, Braverman RM, Zerhouni EA. Solitary pulmonary nodules: CT assessment. Radiology 1986; 160:307-312
5. Ginsberg MS, Griff SK, Go BD, Yoo HH, Schwartz LH, Panicek DM. Pulmonary nodules resected at video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: etiology in 426 patients. Radiology 1999; 213:277-282
6. Swensen SJ, Viggiano RW, Midthun DE, et al. Lung nodule enhancement at CT: multicenter study. Radiology 2000; 214:73-80
7. Kostakoglu L, Agress H Jr, Goldsmith SJ. Clinical role of FDG PET in evaluation of cancer patients. RadioGraphics 2003; 23:315-340
8. Mastin ST, Drane WE, Harman EM, Fenton JJ, Quesenberry L. FDG SPECT in patients with lung masses. Chest 1999; 115:1012-1017
9. Goldsmith SJ, Kostakoglu L. Nuclear medicine imaging of lung cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 2000; 38:511-524
10. Goo JM, Im JG, Do KH, et al. Pulmonary tuberculoma evaluated by means of FDG PET: findings in 10 cases. Radiology 2000; 216:117-121
11. Higashi K, Nishikawa T, Seki H, et al. Fluorine-18-FDG PET imaging is negative in bronchioloalveolar lung carcinoma. J Nucl Med 1998; 39:1016-1020
12. Cheran SK, Nielsen ND, Patz EF Jr. False-negative findings for primary lung tumors on FDG positron emission tomography: staging and prognostic implications. AJR 2004; 182:1129-1132
13. Ney FG, Feist JH, Altemus LR, Ordinario VR. The characteristic angiographic criteria of malignancy. Radiology 1972; 104:567-570
14. Littleton JT, Durizch ML, Moeller G, Herbert DE. Pulmonary masses: contrast enhancement. Radiology 1990; 177:861-871
15. Patz EF Jr, Lowe VJ, Hoffman JM, et al. Focal pulmonary abnormalities: evaluation with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET scanning. Radiology 1993; 188:487-490
16. Gupta NC, Frank AR, Dewan NA, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodule: detection of malignancy with PET with 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. Radiology 1992; 184:441-444
17. Hsu WH, Ikezoe J, Chen CY, et al. Color Doppler ultrasound signals of thoracic lesions: correlation with resected histologic specimens. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 153:1938-1951
18. Yamashita K, Matsunobu S, Tsuda T, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodule: preliminary study of evaluation with incremental dynamic CT. Radiology 1995; 194:399-405
19. Swensen SJ, Brown LR, Colby TV, Weaver AL, Midthun DE. Lung nodule enhancement at CT: prospective findings. Radiology 1996; 201:447-455
20. Zhang M, Kono M. Solitary pulmonary nodules: evaluation of blood flow patterns with dynamic CT. Radiology 1997; 205:471-478
21. Yi CA, Lee KS, Kim EA, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodules: dynamic enhanced multi-detector row CT study and comparison with vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel density. Radiology 2004; 233:191-199
22. Fujimoto K, Edamitsu O, Meno S, Abe T, Uchida M, Nishimura H. Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic MR imaging in pulmonary disease: evaluation of usefulness in differentiating benign from malignant disease. Radiology 1993; 189[suppl]:438
23. Kono M, Adachi S, Kusumoto M, Sakai E. Clinical utility of Gd-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in lung cancer. J Thorac Imaging 1993; 8:18-26
24. Hittmair K, Eckersberger F, Klepetko W, Helbich T, Herold CJ. Evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules evaluated with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: a promising technique? Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 13:923-933
25. Gückel C, Schnabel K, Deimling M, Steinbrich W. Solitary pulmonary nodules: MR evaluation of enhancement patterns with contrast-enhanced dynamic snapshot gradient-echo imaging. Radiology 1996; 200:681-686
26. Kono R, Fujimoto K, Terasaki H, Sadohara J, Nishimura H, Hayabuchi N. Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic MR imaging in 210 pulmonary diseases: evaluation of usefulness in differentiating lung cancer from benign nodular lesion. Radiology 2001; 221[suppl]: 203
27. Ohno Y, Hatabu H, Takenaka D, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodules: Potential role of dynamic MR imaging in management: initial experience. Radiology 2002; 224:503-511
28. Schaefer JF, Vollmar J, Schick F, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodules: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: perfusion differences in malignant and benign lesions. Radiology 2004; 232:544-553
29. Fujimoto K, Abe T, Müller NL, et al. Small peripheral pulmonary carcinoma evaluated with dynamic MR imaging: correlation with tumor vascularity and prognosis. Radiology 2003; 227:786-793
30. Kohno N, Ikezoe J, Johkoh T, et al. Focal organizing pneumonia: CT appearance. Radiology 1993; 189:119-123
31. Lohr RH, Boland BJ, Douglas WW, et al. Organizing pneumonia: features and prognosis of cryptogenic, secondary, and focal variants. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157:1323-1329
32. Oikonomou A, Hansell DM. Organizing pneumonia: the many morphological faces. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:1486-1496
33. Verstraete KL, De Deene Y, Roels H, Dierick A, Uyttendaele D, Kunnen M. Benign and malignant musculoskeletal lesions: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: parametric "first-pass" images depict tissue vascularization and perfusion. Radiology 1994; 192:835-843
34. Sakai F, Sone S, Maruyama A, et al. Thin-rim enhancement in Gd-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of tuberculoma: a new finding of potential differential diagnostic importance. J Thorac Imaging 1992; 7:64-69
35. Kusumoto M, Kono M, Adachi S, et al. Gadopentetate-dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for lung nodules: differentiation of lung cancer and tuberculoma. Invest Radiol 1994; 29[suppl 2]:S255-S256
36. Maruyama S, Murakami J, Hashimoto S, et al. Non-calcified pulmonary tuberculosis: CT enhancement pattern with histological correlation. J Thorac Imaging 1995; 10:91-95
37. Gupta NC, Aloof J, Gunnel E. Probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules using fluorine-18-FDG and PET. J Nucl Med 1996; 37:943-948
38. Strich G, Hagen PL, Gerber KH, Slutsky RA. Tissue distribution and magnetic resonance spin lattice relaxation effects of gadolinium-DTPA. Radiology 1985; 154:723-726
39. Weinmann HJ, Brasch RC, Press WR, Wesbey GE. Characteristics of gadolinium-DTPA complex: a potential NMR contrast agent. AJR 1984; 142:619-624
40. Siegelman SS, Khouri NF, Scott WW Jr, et al. Pulmonary hamartoma: CT findings. Radiology 1986; 160:313-317
41. Sakai F, Sone S, Kiyono K, et al. MR of pulmonary hamartoma: pathologic correlation. J Thorac Imaging 1994; 9:51-55