The aging of the immune response in drosophila melanogaster

Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 129-135

  Khan, Imroze ^a,b   Prasad, N G ^c  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH KOLKATA   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALCUTTA   (India)

^c INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH MOHALI   (India)

Author keywords

Drosophilia melanogaster Immune response Parental age Senescence Serrati marcescens

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; INVERTEBRATA; MELANOGASTER; SERRATIA MARCESCENS;

AGING; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL LOAD; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; HOST PATHOGEN INTERACTION; IMMUNOLOGY; MALE; MICROBIOLOGY; PATHOGENICITY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SERRATIA MARCESCENS; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

AGING; ANIMALS; BACTERIAL LOAD; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS; MALE; MODELS, IMMUNOLOGICAL; REPRODUCTION; SERRATIA MARCESCENS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 84871785621     PISSN: 10795006     EISSN: 1758535X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/gls144     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Beharka AA, Paiva S, Leka LS, Ribaya-Mercado JD, Russell RM, Nibkin Meydani S. Effect of age on the gastrointestinal-associated mucosal immune response of humans. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:B218-B223. (Pubitemid 32381800)
2. DeVeale B, Brummel T, Seroude L. Immunity and aging: the enemy within? Aging Cell. 2004;3:195-208. (Pubitemid 40246684)
3. Finch CE, Crimmins EM. Infammatory exposure and historical changes in human life-spans. Science. 2004;305:1736-1739. (Pubitemid 39249633)
4. Goldstein D. Role of aging on innate responses to viral infections. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012;67A(3):242-246.
5. Zerofsky M, Harel E, Silverman N, Tatar M. Aging of the innate immune response in Drosophila melanogaster. Aging Cell. 2007;4:103-108.
6. Lesser KJ, Paiusi IC, Leips J. Naturally occurring genetic variation in the age-specifc immune response of Drosophila melanogaster. Aging Cell. 2006;5:293-295. (Pubitemid 44103244)
7. Ren C, Webster P, Finkel SE, Tower J. Increased internal and external bacterial load during Drosophila aging without life-span trade-off. Cell Metab. 2007;6:144-152. (Pubitemid 47163619)
8. Ramsden S, Cheung YY, Seroude L. Functional analysis of the Drosophila immune response during aging. Aging Cell. 2008;7:225-236. (Pubitemid 351359655)
9. Mackenzie DK, Bussière LF, Tinsley MC. Senescence of the cellular immune response in Drosophila melanogaster. Exp Gerontol. 2011;46(11):853-859.
10. Long TAF, Pischedda A. Do female Drosophila melanogaster adap-tively bias offspring sex ratios in relation to the age of their mate? Proc R Soc B. 2005;272:1781-1787. (Pubitemid 41414657)
11. Priest NK, Mackowiak B, Promislow DE. The role of parental age effects on the evolution of aging. Evolution. 2002;56:927-935. (Pubitemid 34617017)
12. Kern S, Ackermann M, Stearns SC, Kawecki TJ. Decline in offspring viability as a manifestation of aging in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution. 2001;55:1822-1831. (Pubitemid 32984000)
13. Hercus MJ, Hoffmann AA. Maternal and grandmaternal age infuence offspring ftness in Drosophila. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2000;267:2105-2110.
14. Swain SL, Nikolich-Zugich J. Key research opportunities in immune system aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;64:183-186.
15. Chippindale AK, Gibson JR, Rice WR. Negative genetic correlation for adult ftness between sexes reveals ontogenetic confict in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:1671-1675. (Pubitemid 32165556)
16. Prasad NG, Bedhomme S, Day T, Chippindale AK. An evolutionary cost of separate genders revealed by male-limited evolution. Am Nat. 2007;169:29-37. (Pubitemid 46095010)
17. Flyg C, Kenne K, Boman HG. Insect pathogenic properties of Serratia marcescens: phage-resistant mutants with a decreased resistance to Cecropia immunity and a decreased virulence to Drosophila. J Gen Microbiol. 1980;120:173-181. (Pubitemid 11218597)
18. Flyg C, Xanthopoulos K. Insect pathogenic properties of Serratia marcescens. Passive and active resistance to insect immunity studied with protease-defcient and phage-resistant mutants. J Gen Microbiol. 1983;129:453-464.
19. Cox CR, Gilmore MS. Native microbial colonization of Drosophila melanogaster and its use as a model of Enterococcus faecalis patho-genesis. Infect Immun. 2007;75:1565-1576. (Pubitemid 46559420)
20. Olcott MH, Henkels MD, Rosen KL, et al. Lethality and developmental delay in Drosophila melanogaster larvae after ingestion of selected Pseudomonas fuorescens strains. PLoS One. 2010;5:e12504.
21. Lazzaro BP, Sackton TB, Clark AG. Genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster resistance to infection: a comparison across bacteria. Genetics. 2006;174:1539-1554. (Pubitemid 44808321)
22. Lazzaro BP, Sceurman BK, Clark AG. Genetic basis of natural variation in D. melanogaster antibacterial immunity. Science. 2004;303:1873-1876. (Pubitemid 38374880)
23. Imroze K, Prasad NG. Sex-specifc effect of bacterial infection on components of adult ftness in Drosophila melanogaster. J Evol Biol Res. 2011;3(6):79-86.
24. McKean KA, Nunney L. Increased sexual activity reduces male immune function in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:904-909.
25. Wang N, Strugnell R, Wijburg O, Brodnicki T. Measuring bacterial load and immune responses in mice infected with Listeria monocy-togenes. J Vis Exp. 2011;54:e3076.
26. Nehme NT, Lié geois S, Kele B, et al. A model of bacterial intestinal infections in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3(11):e173.
27. Prasad NG, Joshi A. What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us? J Genet. 2003;82:45-76. (Pubitemid 37550253)
28. Van Noordwijk AJ, Dejong G. Acquisition and allocation of resources-their infuence on variation in life-history tactics. Am Nat. 1986;128(1):137-142.
29. Lenski RE. Experimental studies of pleiotropy and epistasis in Escherichia coli. I. Variation in competitive ftness among mutants resistant to virus T4. Evolution. 1988;42:425-432.
30. Sheldon B, Verhulst S. Ecological immunity: costly parasite defences and trade-offs in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996;11:317-321.
31. Kraaijeveld AR, Godfray HCJ. Trade-off between parasitoid resistance and larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 1997;389:278-280. (Pubitemid 27406639)
32. Webster JP, Woolhouse MEJ. Cost of resistance: relationship between reduced fertility and increased resistance in a snail-schistosome host-parasite system. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1999;266:391-396. (Pubitemid 29092577)
33. Kraaijeveld AR, Ferrari J, Godfray HCJ. Costs of resistance in insect-parasite and insect-parasitoid interactions. Parasitology. 2002;125:S71-S82. (Pubitemid 36207781)
34. McKean KA, Yourth CP, Lazzaro BP, Clark AG. The evolutionary costs of immunological maintenance and deployment. BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8:76.
35. Stearns SC. The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992.
36. Jin W, Riley RM, Wolfnger RD, White KP, Passador-Gurgel G, Gibson G. The contributions of sex, genotype and age to transcriptional variance in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Genet. 2001;29:389-395. (Pubitemid 34326688)
37. Pletcher SD, Macdonald SJ, Marguerie R, et al. Genome-wide transcript profles in aging and calorically restricted Drosophila mela-nogaster. Curr Biol. 2002;12:712-723. (Pubitemid 34455424)
38. Ayres JS, Schneider DS. Tolerance of infections. Ann Rev Immunol. 2012;30:271-294.
39. Bateman AJ. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity. 1948;2:349-368.
40. Rolff J. Bateman's principle and immunity. Proc R Soc London B. 2002;269:867-872. (Pubitemid 34478358)
41. Kurtz J, Wiesner A, Goetz P, Sauer KP. Gender differences and individual variation in the immune system of the scorpionfy Panorpa vul-garis (Insecta: Mecoptera). Dev Comp Immunol. 2000;24:1-12. (Pubitemid 30109468)
42. Joop G, Rolff J. Plasticity of immune function and condition under the risk of predation and parasitism. Evol Ecol Res. 2004;6:1051-1062. (Pubitemid 39509025)
43. Joop G, Mitschke A, Rolff J, Siva-Jothy M. Immune function and parasite resistance in male and polymorphic female Coenagrion puella. BMC Evol Biol. 2006;6:19.
44. Promislow DEL. Costs of sexual selection in natural populations of mammals. Proc R Soc Lond Biol. 1992;247:203-210.
45. Promislow DEL, Haselkorn TS. Age-specifc metabolic rates and mortality rates in the genus Drosophila. Aging Cell. 2002;1:66-74.
46. Promislow DEL, Montgomerie RD, Martin TE. Mortality costs of sexual dimorphism in birds. Proc R Soc Lond Biol. 1992;250:143-150. (Pubitemid 24408875)
47. Partridge L, Andrews R. The effect of reproductive activity on the longevity of male Drosophila melanogaster is not caused by an acceleration of ageing. J Insect Physiol. 1985;31:393-395.
48. Fowler K, Partridge L. A cost of mating in female fruitfies. Nature. 1989;338:760-761.
49. Chapman T, Liddle LF, Kalb JM, Wolfner MF, Partridge L. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature. 1995;373:241-244.
50. Rolff J, Siva-Jothy. Copulation corrupts immunity: a mechanism for a cost of mating in insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:9916-9918. (Pubitemid 34831147)
51. Schwarzenbach GA, Hosken DJ, Ward PI. Sex and immunity in the yellow dung fy Scathophaga stercoraria. J Evol Biol. 2005;18:455-463. (Pubitemid 40350940)
52. Shoemaker KL, Parsons NM, Adamo SA. Mating enhances parasite resistance in the cricket Gryllus texensis. Anim Behav. 2006;71:371-380. (Pubitemid 43186037)
53. Valtonen TM, Viitaniemi H, Rantala MJ. Copulation enhances resistance against an entomopathogenic fungus in the mealworm beetle Tenebrio molitor. Parasitology. 2010;137:985-989.
54. Short SM, Lazzaro BP. Female and male genetic contributions to post-mating immune defence in female Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc Lond Biol. 2010;277:3649-3657.
55. Crow JF. The high spontaneous mutation rate: is it a health risk? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:8380-8386. (Pubitemid 27335047)
56. Hansen TF, Price DK. Age-and sex-distribution of the mutation load. Genetica. 1999;106:251-262.