Magnetic resonance imaging-based treatment planning for prostate brachytherapy

Brachytherapy

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 30-37

  Albert, Jeffrey M ^a   Swanson, David A ^a   Pugh, Thomas J ^a   Zhang, Michael ^a   Bruno, Teresa L ^a   Kudchadker, Rajat J ^a   Frank, Steven J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Brachytherapy; Endorectal MRI; Image guidance; Prostate

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRACHYTHERAPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DOSIMETRY; ENDORECTAL COIL NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA; PROSTATE VOLUME; RADIOACTIVITY; STANDARD BODY ARRAY COIL NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; TREATMENT PLANNING;

HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RADIOTHERAPY DOSAGE; RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOTHERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84871759675     PISSN: 15384721     EISSN: 18731449     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2012.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Blasko J.C., Radge H., Schumacher D. Transperineal percutaneous iodine-125 implantation for prostatic carcinoma using transrectal ultrasound and template guidance. Endocurie Hypertherm Oncol 1987, 3:131-139.
2. Prestidge B.R., Prete J.J., Buchholz T.A., et al. A survey of current clinical practice of permanent prostate brachytherapy in the United States. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998, 40:461-465.
3. Nag S., Beyer D., Friedland J., et al. American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommendations for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999, 44:789-799.
4. Nag S., Ciezki J.P., Cormack R., et al. Intraoperative planning and evaluation of permanent prostate brachytherapy: Report of the American Brachytherapy Society. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001, 51:1422-1430.
5. Bates T.S., Reynard J.M., Peters T.J., et al. Determination of prostatic volume with transrectal ultrasound: A study of intra-observer and interobserver variation. J Urol 1996, 155:1299-1300.
6. Choi Y.J., Kim J.K., Kim H.J., et al. Interobserver variability of transrectal ultrasound for prostate volume measurement according to volume and observer experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009, 192:444-449.
7. Collins G.N., Raab G.M., Hehir M., et al. Reproducibility and observer variability of transrectal ultrasound measurements of prostatic volume. Ultrasound Med Biol 1995, 21:1101-1105.
8. Sech S., Montoya J., Girman C.J., et al. Interexaminer reliability of transrectal ultrasound for estimating prostate volume. J Urol 2001, 166:125-129.
9. Futterer J.J., Barentsz J., Heijmijnk S.T. Imaging modalities for prostate cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2009, 9:923-937.
10. Al-Qaisieh B., Ash D., Bottomley D.M., et al. Impact of prostate volume evaluation by different observers on CT-based post-implant dosimetry. Radiother Oncol 2002, 62:267-273.
11. Dubois D.F., Prestidge B.R., Hotchkiss L.A., et al. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of MR imaging- and CT-derived prostate volumes after transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy. Radiology 1998, 207:785-789.
12. Lee W.R., Roach M., Michalski J., et al. Interobserver variability leads to significant differences in quantifiers of prostate implant adequacy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002, 54:457-461.
13. Hoffelt S.C., Marshall L.M., Garzotto M., et al. A comparison of CT scan to transrectal ultrasound-measured prostate volume in untreated prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003, 57:29-32.
14. Narayana V., Roberson P.L., Pu A.T., et al. Impact of differences in ultrasound and computed tomography volumes on treatment planning of permanent prostate implants. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997, 37:1181-1185.
15. Pondman K.M., Futterer J.J., ten Haken B., et al. MR-guided biopsy of the prostate: An overview of techniques and a systematic review. Eur Urol 2008, 54:517-527.
16. Tempany C., Straus S., Hata N., et al. MR-guided prostate interventions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 27:356-367.
17. Barkati M., Van Dyk S., Foroudi F., et al. The use of magnetic resonance imaging for image-guided brachytherapy. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2010, 54:137-141.
18. D'Amico A.V., Cormack R., Tempany C.M., et al. Real-time magnetic resonance image-guided interstitial brachytherapy in the treatment of select patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998, 42:507-515.
19. Smith W.L., Lewis C., Bauman G., et al. Prostate volume contouring: A 3D analysis of segmentation using 3DTRUS, CT, and MR. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007, 67:1238-1247.
20. Tewari A., Indudhara R., Shinohara K., et al. Comparison of transrectal ultrasound prostatic volume estimation with magnetic resonance imaging volume estimation and surgical specimen weight in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Clin Ultrasound 1996, 24:169-174.
21. Heijmink S.W., Futterer J.J., Hambrock T., et al. Prostate cancer: Body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T-comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance. Radiology 2007, 244:184-195.
22. Hricak H., White S., Vigneron D., et al. Carcinoma of the prostate gland: MR imaging with pelvic phased-array coils versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Radiology 1994, 193:703-709.
23. Taussky D., Haider M., McLean M., et al. Factors predicting an increased dose to the penile bulb in permanent seed prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2004, 3:125-129.
24. Merrick G.S., Butler W.M., Wallner K.E., et al. The importance of radiation doses to the penile bulb vs. crura in the development of postbrachytherapy erectile dysfunction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002, 54:1055-1062.
25. Merrick G.S., Wallner K., Butler W.M., et al. A comparison of radiation dose to the bulb of the penis in men with and without prostate brachytherapy-induced erectile dysfunction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001, 50:597-604.
26. Solan A.N., Cesaretti J.A., Stone N.N., et al. There is no correlation between erectile dysfunction and dose to penile bulb and neurovascular bundles following real-time low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009, 73:1468-1474.
27. van der Wielen G.J., Mulhall J.P., Incrocci L. Erectile dysfunction after radiotherapy for prostate cancer and radiation dose to the penile structures: A critical review. Radiother Oncol 2007, 84:107-113.
28. DiBiase S.J., Hosseinzadeh K., Gullapalli R.P., et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging-guided brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002, 52:429-438.
29. Pouliot J., Kim Y., Lessard E., et al. Inverse planning for HDR prostate brachytherapy used to boost dominant intraprostatic lesions defined by magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004, 59:1196-1207.
30. van Lin E.N., Futterer J.J., Heijmink S.W., et al. IMRT boost dose planning on dominant intraprostatic lesions: Gold marker-based three-dimensional fusion of CT with dynamic contrast-enhanced and 1H-spectroscopic MRI. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006, 65:291-303.
31. Hirose M., Bharatha A., Hata N., et al. Quantitative MR imaging assessment of prostate gland deformation before and during MR imaging-guided brachytherapy. Acad Radiol 2002, 9:906-912.
32. Daanen V., Gastaldo J., Giraud J.Y., et al. MRI/TRUS data fusion for brachytherapy. Int J Med Robot 2006, 2:256-261.
33. Reynier C., Troccaz J., Fourneret P., et al. MRI/TRUS data fusion for prostate brachytherapy. Preliminary results. Med Phys 2004, 31:1568-1575.
34. Tanaka O., Hayashi S., Matsuo M., et al. MRI-based preplanning in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2008, 88:115-120.
35. Heijmink S.W., Scheenen T.W., van Lin E.N., et al. Changes in prostate shape and volume and their implications for radiotherapy after introduction of endorectal balloon as determined by MRI at 3T. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009, 73:1446-1453.
36. Kim Y., Hsu I.C., Pouliot J., et al. Expandable and rigid endorectal coils for prostate MRI: Impact on prostate distortion and rigid image registration. Med Phys 2005, 32:3569-3578.
37. Crook J., McLean M., Yeung I., et al. MRI-CT fusion to assess postbrachytherapy prostate volume and the effects of prolonged edema on dosimetry following transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2004, 3:55-60.
38. Heijmink S.W., Futterer J.J., Strum S.S., et al. State-of-the-art uroradiologic imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Acta Oncol 2011, 50(Suppl. 1):25-38.