Critical results communication: Still an open issue

Clinical Biochemistry

Volumn 46, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 184-

  Piva, Elisa ^a   Plebani, Mario ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL LABORATORY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LABORATORY TEST; LETTER; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

EID: 84871750302     PISSN: 00099120     EISSN: 18732933     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.09.019     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Liebow E.B., Derzon J.H., Fontanesi J., Favoretto A.M., Baetz R.A., Shaw C., et al. Effectiveness of automated notification and customer service call centers for timely and accurate reporting of critical values: a laboratory medicine best practices systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Biochem Jun 29 2012, [Epub ahead of print].
2. Laboratory medicine best practices: developing systematic evidence review and evaluation methods for quality improvement: Phase 3 final technical report 2010; Evidence Summaries: critical value reporting-practices: 89-102 CDC Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Team, [Accessed August 2012]. https://www.futurelabmedicine.org/pdfs/LMBP%20Executive%20Summary%20%20YR%203%20Final%20Report.pdf.
3. Piva E., Sciacovelli L., Zaninotto M., Laposata M., Plebani M. Evaluation of effectiveness of a computerized notification system for reporting critical values. Am J Clin Pathol 2009, 131:432-441.
4. Saxena S., Kempf R., Wilcox S., Shulman I.A., Wong L., Cunningham G., et al. Critical laboratory value notification: a failure mode effects and criticality analysis. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005, 31:495-506.