Response surfaces for compressive strength of concrete

Construction and Building Materials

Volumn 40, Issue , 2013, Pages 763-774

  Cihan, M Timur ^a   Güner, Abdurrahman ^b   Yüzer, Nabi ^c  

^a NAMIK KEMAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Compressive strength; Concrete; D Optimal design; Fractional factorial design; Response surface methodology

Indexed keywords

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE; D-OPTIMAL DESIGNS; FRACTIONAL FACTORIAL DESIGNS; HIGH-QUALITY PRODUCTS; INCREASED PRODUCTIVITY; INTERACTION TERM; PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; READY-MIXED; RESPONSE SURFACE; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SIMULTANEOUSLY CONTROLLABLE; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENTS (TQM);

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONCRETES; READY MIXED CONCRETE; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; CONCRETE MIXERS; DESIGN; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

SURFACE PROPERTIES; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH;

EID: 84871733256     PISSN: 09500618     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.048     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. R.H. Myers, and D.C. Montgomery Response surface methodology, process and product optimization using designed experiments second ed. 2002 John Wiley & Sons Canada
2. G. Taguchi, Y. Wu, and S. Chowdhury Taguchi's quality engineering handbook 1st ed. 2004 John Wiley & Sons
3. M.J. Simon, E.S. Lagergren, and K.A. Snyder Concrete mixture optimization using statistical mixture design methods 1997 International Symposium on High Performance Concrete New Orleans
4. C. Cau Dit Coumes, and S Courtois Cementation of a low-level radioactive waste of complex chemistry: investigation of the combined action of borate, chloride, sulfate and phosphate on cement hydration using response surface methodology Cem Conc Res 33 2003 305 316
5. M.G. Anna, and P. Zdzislaw Study on compatibility of cement- superplasticiser assistedby multicriteria statistical optimization J Mater Process Technol 152 2004 197 203
6. F. Bayramov Çimento esasli kompozit malzemelerin optimum tasarimi (Doktora Tezi) 2004 İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi İstanbul
7. A. Mandal, and P. Roy Modeling the compressive strength of molasses-cement sand system using design of experiments and back propagation neural network J Mater Process Technol 180 2006 167 173
8. E.K. Nambiar, and K. Ramamurthy Models relating mixture composition to the density and strength of foam concrete using response surface methodology Cem Conc Compos 28 2006 752 760
9. T. Cho Prediction of cyclic freeze-thaw damage in concrete structures based on response surface method Const Build Mater 21 2007 2031 2040
10. B. Akçay, and M.A. Taşdemir Optimisation of using lightweight aggregates in mitigating autogenous deformation of concrete Const Build Mater 23 2009 353 363
11. A. Maghsoud, A.N. Amir, and G. Komeil Response surface methodology and genetic algorithm in optimization of cement clinkering process J Appl Sci 15 2008 2732 2738
12. C. Ahlem, T. Lotfi, S. Basma, and B. Samir Formulation of blended cement: effect of process variables on clay pozzolanic activity Const Build Mater 23 2009 1365 1373
13. Stat-Ease Inc., Design-Expert Software Version 7.1. Minneapolis; 2010.
14. M.A. Neville Properties of concrete forth ed. 1995 Longman Scientific & Technical England