Response surface methodology and genetic algorithm in optimization of cement clinkering process

Journal of Applied Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue 15, 2008, Pages 2732-2738

  Amiri, Maghsoud ^a   Najafi, Amir Abbas ^b   Gheshlaghi, Komeil ^b  

^a ALLAMEH TABATABA'I UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cement; Clinker; Experimental optimization; Genetic algorithm; Response surface methodology

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDES; BURNING TEMPERATURE; CLINKER; CONTROL VARIABLE; EXPERIMENTAL OPTIMIZATION; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SATURATION FACTORS; TRADITIONAL TECHNIQUES;

ALUMINA; CEMENTS; LIME; OPTIMIZATION; SILICA; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

GENETIC ALGORITHMS;

EID: 67649276934     PISSN: 18125654     EISSN: 18125662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2008.2732.2738     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. CauDitCoumes, C. and S. Courtois, 2003. Cementation of low-level radioactive waste of complex chemistry investigation of the combined action of borate, chloride, sulfate and phosphate on cement hydration using response surface methodology. Cem. Concr. Res., 33: 305-316.
2. Correia, D.S., C.V. Goncoalves, S.S. Da Cunha and V.A. Ferraresi, 2005. Comparison between genetic algorithm and response surface methodology in GMAW welding optimization. J. Mater. Process. Techno., 160: 70-76.
3. Grabiec, A.M. and Z. Piasta, 2004. Study on compatibility of Cement-super plasticizer assisted by multi criteria statistical optimization. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 52: 197-203.
4. Khuri, A.I. and J.A. Cornell, 1996. Response Surface: Design and Analysis. 2nd Edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, ISBN: 0824797418.
5. Koksoy, O. and T. Yalcinoz, 2006. Mean square error criteria to multi response process optimization by a new genetic algorithm. Applied Math. Computat, 175: 1657-1674.
6. Kunhanandan Nambiar, E.K. and K. Ramamurthy, 2006. Models relating mixture composition to the density and strength of Foam concrete using response surface methodology. Cem. Concr. Composites, 28: 752-760.
7. Mandal, A. and P. Roy, 2006. Modeling the compressive strength of molasses-cement sand system using design of experiments and back propagation neural network. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 80: 167-173.
8. Myers, R.H. and D.C. Montgomery, 2002. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. 1 st Edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York, ISBN: 0471412554.
9. Oktem, H., T. Erzurumlu and H. Kurtaran, 2005. Application of response surface methodology in the optimization of cutting conditions for surface roughness. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 70: 11-16.
10. Ozcelik, B. and T. Erzurumlu, 2005. Determination of effecting dimensional parameters onwarpage of thin shell plastic parts using integrated response surface method and genetic algorithm. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, 32: 1085-1094.
11. Suresh, P. V.S., P. Venkateswara Rao and S.G. Deshmukh, 2002. A genetic algorithm approach for optimization of surface roughness prediction model. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 42: 675-680.