Performance of two swine manure treatment systems on chemical composition and on the reduction of pathogens

Chemosphere

Volumn 90, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1539-1544

  Viancelli, A ^a   Kunz, A ^b   Steinmetz, R L R ^b   Kich, J D ^b   Souza, C K ^c   Canal, C W ^c   Coldebella, A ^b   Esteves, P A ^b   Barardi, C R M ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^b EMBRAPA CERRADOS   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Coliforms; Salmonella; Swine wastewater; Virus; Water reuse

Indexed keywords

AMMONIA; CHEMICAL CLEANING; EFFLUENTS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FERTILIZERS; MANURES; SALMONELLA; VIRUSES; WASTEWATER RECLAMATION; WATER CONSERVATION;

ADDITIONAL TREATMENT; ANAEROBIC REACTOR; CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS; COLIFORMS; SOLID LIQUID SEPARATION; SWINE WASTEWATER; TREATED EFFLUENT; WATER REUSE;

CHEMICAL DETECTION;

AMMONIA; NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; ASSESSMENT METHOD; BACTERIUM; BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; EFFLUENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTION; MANURE; NITROGEN COMPOUND; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PHOSPHORUS; POULTRY; RECYCLING; VIRUS; WASTEWATER;

AEROBIC REACTOR; ANAEROBIC REACTOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL VIRULENCE; BIODIGESTER; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CIRCOVIRUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGESTION; EFFLUENT; ESCHERICHIA COLI; LAGOON; MANURE; MICROBIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; NONHUMAN; PARVOVIRUS; SALMONELLA; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; SOLID LIQUID SEPARATION; SWINE MANURE TREATMENT SYSTEM; TORQUE TENO VIRUS; VIRUS PARTICLE; VIRUS VIRULENCE; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

ANIMALIA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); CIRCOVIRUS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; PARVOVIRUS; SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA SP.; SUIDAE; TORQUE TENO VIRUS;

EID: 84871714097     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: 18791298     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.08.055     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ABIPESC - Brazilian Pork Industry and Exporter Association, 2011. <> (accessed March 2012). http://www.abipecs.org.br/uploads/relatorios/relatorios-associados-ingles/Abipecs_annual_report_2011.pdf.
2. APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 2005, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. 21st ed.
3. BAM, 2003. Bacteriological Analytical Manual. <> (accessed March 2009). http://www.fda.gov.
4. CONAMA (Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente), 2011. Resolução 430, Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasil.
5. Costantini V.P., Azevedo A.C., Li X., Williams M.C., Michel F.C., Saif L.J. Effects of different animal waste treatment technologies on detection and viability of porcine enteric viruses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73:5284-5291.
6. Fernandes G.W., Kunz A., Steinmetz R.L.R., Szogi A., Vanotti M., Flores E.M.M., Dressler V.L. Chemical phosphorus removal: a clean strategy for piggery wastewater management in Brazil. Environ. Technol. 2012, 33:1677-1683.
7. Griffin J.S., Plummer J.D., Long S.C. Torque teno virus: an improved indicator for viral pathogens in drinking waters. Virol. J. 2008, 5:112-118.
8. Griffith R.W., Schartz K.J., Meyerholz D.K. Salmonella. Diseases of Swine 2012, 739-753. Blackwell Publishing, Iowa. J.J. Zimmermman, L. Karriker, A. Ramirez, K. Schwartz, G. Stevenson (Eds.).
9. Hamza I.A., Jurzik L., überla K., Wilhelm M. Evaluation of pepper mild mottle virus, human picobirnavirus and Torque teno virus as indicators of fecal contamination in river water. Water Res. 2011, 45:1358-1368.
10. Haramoto E., Katayama H., Ohgaki S. Quantification and genotyping of torque teno virus at a wastewater treatment plant in Japan. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74:7434-7436.
11. Hundesa A., Maluquer de Motes C., Albinana-Gimenez N.C., Rodriguez-Manzano J., Bofill-Mas S., Suñen E., Girones R. Development of a qPCR assay for the quantification of porcine adenoviruses as an MST tool for swine fecal contamination in the environment. J. Virol. Methods 2009, 158:130-135.
12. Hutchison M.L., Walters L.D., Avery S.M., Munro F., Moore A. Analyses of livestock production, waste storage, and pathogen levels and prevalence in farm manures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71:1231-1236.
13. Kunz A., Miele M., Steinmetz R.L.R. Advanced swine manure treatment and utilization in Brazil. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:5485-5489.
14. Kunz, A., Oliveira, P.A., Higarashi, M.M., 2005. Biodigestor para o tratamento de dejetos de suínos: influência da temperatura ambiente. Comunicado Técnico, Embrapa/CNPSA, vol. 416, pp. 1-5.
15. Martens W., Böhm R. Overview of the ability of different treatment methods for liquid and solid manure to inactivate pathogens. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:5374-5378.
16. Ndegwa P.M., Zhu J., Luo A. Effects of solids separation and time on the production of odorous compounds in stored pig slurry. Biosyst. Eng. 2002, 81:127-133.
17. Olson M.R., Axler R.P., Hicks R.E. Effects of freezing and storage temperature on MS2 viability. J. Virol. Methods 2004, 122:147-152.
18. Palhares J.C.P. Water footprint of pigs slaughtered in the states of south-central Brazil. Acta Sci. Anim. Sci. 2011, 33:309-314.
19. Pérez-Sangrador M.P., León-Cófreces M.C., Acítores-Benavente M., García-González M.C. Solids and nutrient removal from flushed swine manure using polyacrylamides. J. Environ. Manage 2012, 93:67-70.
20. Sahlström L., Baggea E., Emmotha E., Holmqvista A., Danielsson-Thamc M.L., Albihna A. A laboratory study of survival of selected microorganisms after heat treatment of biowaste used in biogas plants. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:7859-7865.
21. SAS Institute Inc., 2003. System for Microsoft Windows, Release 9.1, Cary, NC, USA. (cd-rom).
22. Segalés J., Martínez-Guinó L., Cortey M., Navarro N., Huerta E., Sibila M., Pujols J., Kekarainen T. Retrospective study on swine torque teno virus genogroups 1 and 2 infection from 1985 to 2005 in Spain. Vet. Microbiol. 2009, 134:199-207.
23. Shangjin C., Cortey M., Segales J. Phylogeny and evolution of the NS1 and VP1/VP2 gene sequences from porcine parvovirus. Virus Res. 2009, 140:209-215.
24. Soares R.M., Durigon E.L., Bersano J.G., Richtzenhain L.J. Detection of porcine parvovirus DNA by the polymerase chain reaction assay using primers to the highly conserved nonstructural protein gene, NS-1. J. Virol. Methods 1999, 78:191-198.
25. Steinmetz R.L.R., Kunz A., Dressler V.L., Flores E.M.M., Martins A.F. Study of metal distribution in raw and screened swine manure. CLEAN: Soil, Air, Water 2009, 37:239-244.
26. Techio V.H., Stolberg J., Kunz A., Zanin E., Perdomo C.C. Genotoxicity of swine effluents. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 63:970-976.
27. Tortora G.J., Funke B.R., Case C.L. Microbiologia. 8th ed. 2005, ArtMed, Porto Alegre.
28. Vanotti M.B., Millner P.D., Hunt P.G., Ellison A.Q. Removal of pathogen and indicator microorganisms from liquid swine manure in multi-step biological and chemical treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96:209-214.
29. Viancelli A., Garcia L.A.T., Kunz A., Steinmetz R., Esteves P.A., Barardi C.R.M. Detection of circoviruses and porcine adenoviruses in water samples collected from swine manure treatment systems. Res. Vet. Sci. 2011, 93:538-543.
30. Vivan M., Kunz A., Stolberg J., Perdomo C., Techio V. Efficiency of biodigester and stabilization pond interaction in removal of swine manure pollutants. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agric. Amb. 2010, 14:320-325.