Towards integrating task information in skills assessment for dexterous tasks in surgery and simulation

Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 5273-5278

  Jog, Amod ^a   Itkowitz, Brandon ^b   Liu, May ^b   DiMaio, Simon ^b   Hager, Greg ^a   Curet, Myriam ^b   Kumar, Rajesh ^a  

^a INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINARY CLASSIFICATION; GROUND TRUTH; MANIPULATION TASK; MOTION DATA; OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT; ROBOTIC SURGERY; SIMULATED ENVIRONMENT; SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT; SKILL ASSESSMENT; TASK COMPLETION TIME; TASK INFORMATION; TASK MOTION; VIDEO DATA;

AUTOMATION; SURGERY;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 84871677176     PISSN: 10504729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICRA.2011.5979967     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. G.S. Guthart and J.K. Salisbury. The Intuitive telesurgery system: overview and application. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Volume 1, pages 618-621, 2000.
2. Shuford MD. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a brief review of outcomes. Proc. Baylor University Medical Center, 20:354-356, 2007.
3. KK Badani, S. Kaul, and M. Menon. Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer, 110(9):1951-1958, 2007.
4. J.F. Boggess. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: evolution of a new surgical paradigm. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 1(1):31-37, 2007.
5. E. Rodriguez and W. Randolph Chitwood. Outcomes in robotic cardiac surgery. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 1(1):19-23, 2007.
6. W.R. Chitwood Jr. Current status of endoscopic and robotic mitral valve surgery. The Annals of thoracic surgery, 79(6):2248-2253, 2005.
7. L. Chang, RM Satava, CA Pellegrini, and MN Sinanan. Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill. Surgical endoscopy, 17(11):1744-1748, 2003.
8. K.E. Roberts, R.L. Bell, and A.J. Duffy. Evolution of surgical skills training. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 12(20):3219, 2006.
9. S. Kaul, N.L. Shah, and M. Menon. Learning curve using robotic surgery. Current Urology Reports, 7(2):125-129, 2006.
10. R. Sarle, A. Tewari, A. Shrivastava, J. Peabody, and M. Menon. Surgical robotics and laparoscopic training drills. Journal of Endourology, 18(1):63-67, 2004.
11. T.N. Judkins, D. Oleynikov, and N. Stergiou. Objective evaluation of expert and novice performance during robotic surgical training tasks. Surgical Endoscopy, 23(3):590-597, 2009.
12. T.S. Lendvay, P. Casale, R. Sweet, and C. Peters. Initial validation of a virtual-reality robotic simulator. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2(3):145-149, 2008.
13. R.M. Satava. Historical review of surgical simulation?a personal perspective. World Journal of Surgery, 32(2):141-148, 2008.
14. R.J. Scalese, V.T. Obeso, and S.B. Issenberg. Simulation technology for skills training and competency assessment in medical education. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23:46-49, 2008.
15. J.R. Korndorffer et al. Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 201(1):23-29, 2005.
16. P.L. Youngblood, S. Srivastava, M. Curet, W.L.R. Heinrichs, P. Dev, and S.M. Wren. Comparison of training on two laparoscopic simulators and assessment of skills transfer to surgical performance. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 200(4):546-551, 2005.
17. TP Grantcharov, VB Kristiansen, J. Bendix, L. Bardram, J. Rosenberg, and P. Funch-Jensen. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. British Journal of Surgery, 91(2):146-150, 2004.
18. M.A. Lerner, M. Ayalew, W.J. Peine, and C.P. Sundaram. Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da vinci surgical system? Journal of Endourology, 24(3):467, 2010.
19. P.A. Kenney, M.F. Wszolek, J.J. Gould, J.A. Libertino, and A. Moin-zadeh. Face, content, and construct validity of dv-trainer, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery. Urology, 73(6):1288-1292, 2009.
20. Simon DiMaio and Chris Hasser. The da vinci research interface. In 2008 MICCAI Workshop - Systems and Architectures for Computer Assisted Interventions, Midas Journal, http://hdl.handle.net/1926/1464, 2008.
21. H.C. Lin, I. Shafran, D. Yuh, and G.D. Hager. Towards automatic skill evaluation: Detection and segmentation of robot-assisted surgical motions. Computer Aided Surgery, 11(5):220-230, 2006.
22. DD Yuh, A Jog, and R Kumar. Automated skill assessment for robotic surgical training. In 47th Annual Meeting of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, page accepted, 2011.
23. J. Rosen, B. Hannaford, C.G. Richards, and M.N. Sinanan. Markov modeling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 48(5):579-591, 2001.
24. JD Hernandez, SD Bann, Y. Munz, K. Moorthy, V. Datta, S. Martin, A. Dosis, F. Bello, A. Darzi, and T. Rockall. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da vinci system. Surgical endoscopy, 18(3):372-378, 2004.
25. Richard O. Duda, Peter E. Hart, and David G. Stork. Pattern Classification (2nd Edition). Wiley-Interscience, 2000.
26. M Hall, E Frank, G Holmes, B Pfahringer, P Reutemann, and I.H. Witten. The weka data mining software: An update. SIGKDD Explorations, 11, 2009.