Biomechanical comparison between single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon under cyclic loading condition

Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy and Technology

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Nohmi, Shuya ^a   Ishibashi, Yasuyuki ^a   Tsuda, Eiichi ^a   Yamamoto, Yuji ^a   Tsukada, Harehiko ^a   Toh, Satoshi ^a  

^a HIROSAKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; ANTERIOR TIBIAL TRANSLATION; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HAMSTRING; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; JOINT LAXITY; KNEE AMPUTATION; KNEE INSTABILITY; LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY; MACHINE; MATERIALS TESTING; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; SOFT TISSUE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TISSUE GRAFT;

EID: 84871671706     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17582555     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1758-2555-4-23     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, et al. Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2004, 32:629-634. 10.1177/0363546503261722, 15090377.
2. Bellier G, Christel P, Colombet P, et al. Double-stranded hamstring graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2004, 20:890-894.
3. Woo SL, Kanamori A, Zeminski J, et al. The effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstrings and patellar tendon. A cadaveric study comparing anterior tibial and rotational loads. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84-A:907-914.
4. Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, et al. Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2002, 30:660-666.
5. Girgis FG, Marshall JL, Monajem A. The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 106:216-231.
6. Aglietti P, Giron F, Cuomo P, et al. Single-and double-incision double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 454:108-113.
7. Järvelä T. Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007, 15:500-507. 10.1007/s00167-006-0254-z, 17216271.
8. Muneta T, Koga H, Morito T, et al. A retrospective study of the midterm outcome of two-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadrupled semitendinosus tendon in comparison with one-bundle reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2006, 22:252-258. 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.12.008, 16517307.
9. Siebold R. Observations on bone tunnel enlargement after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2007, 23:291-298. 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.01.006, 17349473.
10. Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, et al. Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 2006, 22:240-251. 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.12.017, 16517306.
11. Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, et al. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Single- versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86:515-520.
12. Radford WJ, Amis AA. Biomechanics of a double prosthetic ligament in the anterior cruciate deficient knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990, 72:1038-1043.
13. Fujie H, Mabuchi K, Woo SL, et al. The use of robotics technology to study human joint kinematics: a new methodology. J Biomech Eng 1993, 115:211-217. 10.1115/1.2895477, 8231133.
14. Gabriel MT, Wong EK, Woo SL-Y, et al. Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads. J Orthop Res 2004, 22:85-89. 10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00133-5, 14656664.
15. Mae T, Shino K, Miyama T, et al. Single- versus two-femoral socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique: biomechanical analysis using a robotic simulator. Arthroscopy 2001, 17:708-716. 10.1053/jars.2001.25250, 11536089.
16. Yamamoto Y, Hsu WH, Woo SL-Y, et al. Knee stability and graft function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A comparison of a lateral and an anatomic femoral tunnel placement. Am J Sports Med 2004, 32:1825-1832. 10.1177/0363546504263947, 15572308.
17. Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ. Anterior cruciate ligament injury rehabilitation in athletes: biomechanical considerations. Sports Med 1996, 22:54-64. 10.2165/00007256-199622010-00005, 8819240.
18. Fu FH, Bennett CH, Lattermann C, Ma CB. Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part 1: biology and biomechanics of reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1999, 27:821-830.
19. Giurea M, Zorilla P, Amis AA, Aichroth P. Comparative pull-out and cyclic-loading strength tests of anchorage of hamstring tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1999, 27:621-625.
20. Höher J, Möller HD, Fu FH. Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1998, 6:231-240. 10.1007/s001670050105, 9826805.
21. Muneta T, Sekiya I, Ogiuchi T, et al. Effects of aggressive early rehabilitation on the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with multi-strand semitendinosus tendon. Int Orthop 1998, 22:352-6. 10.1007/s002640050276, 10093800.
22. Woo SL-Y, Orlando CA, Camp JF, et al. Effects of postmortem storage by freezing on ligament tensile behavior. J Biomech 1986, 19:399-404. 10.1016/0021-9290(86)90016-3, 3733765.
23. Race A, Amis AA. Loading of the two bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament: an analysis of bundle function in A-P drawer. J Biomechanics 1996, 29:873-879.
24. Scheffler SU, Südkamp NP, Göckenjan A. Biomechanical comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: The impact of fixation level and fixation method under cyclic loading. Arthroscopy 2002, 18:304-315. 10.1053/jars.2002.30609, 11877619.
25. Shino K, Mae T, Maeda A, et al. Graft fixation with predetermined tension using a new device, the double spike plate. Arthroscopy 2002, 18:908-911. 10.1053/jars.2002.35267, 12368790.
26. Höher J, Scheffler SU, Withrow JD, et al. Mechanical behavior of two hamstring graft constructs for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop Res 2000, 18:456-461. 10.1002/jor.1100180319, 10937634.
27. Ishibashi Y, Rudy TW, Livesay GA, et al. The effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation site at the tibia on knee stability: evaluation using a robotic testing system. Arthroscopy 1997, 13:177-182. 10.1016/S0749-8063(97)90152-3, 9127075.
28. Staerke C, Möhwald A, Gröbel KH, et al. ACL graft migration under cyclic loading. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010, 18:1065-1070. 10.1007/s00167-009-0970-2, 19862500.
29. Tsuda E, Fukuda Y, Loh JC, et al. The effect of soft-tissue graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on graft-tunnel motion under anterior tibial loading. Arthroscopy 2002, 18:960-967. 10.1053/jars.2002.36112, 12426538.
30. van Eck CF, Lesniak BP, Schreiber VM, Fu FH. Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction flowchart. Arthroscopy 2010, 26:258-268. 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.07.027, 20141990.
31. Arnoczky SP. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983, 172:19-25.
32. Hutchinson MR, Ash SA. Resident's ridge: assessing the cortical thickness of the lateral wall and roof of the intercondylar notch. Arthroscopy 2003, 19:931-935. 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.09.002, 14608310.
33. Hiraga Y, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, et al. Biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques using cyclic loading tests. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006, 14:13-19. 10.1007/s00167-005-0633-x, 16001288.
34. Rodeo SA, Kawamura S, Kim HJ, et al. Tendon healing in a bone tunnel differs at the tunnel entrance versus the tunnel exit: an effect of graft-tunnel motion?. Am J Sports Med 2006, 34:1790-1800. 10.1177/0363546506290059, 16861579.
35. Spindler KP, Kuhn JE, Freedman KB, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring. Does it really matter? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med 2004, 32:1986-1995. 10.1177/0363546504271211, 15572332.
36. Magen HE, Howell SM, Hull ML. Structural properties of six tibial fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue grafts. Am J Sports Med 1999, 27:35-43.
37. Steiner ME, Hecker AT, Brown CHJ, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation. Comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med 1994, 22:240-246. 10.1177/036354659402200215, 8198194.