Warm, humidified carbon dioxide gas insufflation for laparoscopic appendicectomy in children: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 257, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 44-53

  Yu, Tzu Chieh ^a   Hamill, James K ^b   Liley, Andrew ^c   Hill, Andrew G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b Department of Paediatric Surgery and Urology ^*  (New Zealand)

^c STARSHIP CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Appendicectomy; carbon dioxide gas insufflation; laparoscopy; paediatric surgery

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ADOLESCENT; AERATION; APPENDECTOMY; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMIDITY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEDIATRIC SURGERY; PERITONITIS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCHOOL CHILD; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADOLESCENT; ANALGESICS, OPIOID; APPENDECTOMY; APPENDICITIS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CHILD; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HOT TEMPERATURE; HUMANS; HUMIDITY; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MORPHINE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PNEUMOPERITONEUM, ARTIFICIAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84871619581     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825f0721     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Zitsman JL. Pediatric minimal-access surgery: update 2006. Pediatrics. 2006;118:304-308. (Pubitemid 46071176)
2. Rangel SJ, Henry MC, Brindle M, et al. Small evidence for small incisions: pe-diatric laparoscopy and the need for more rigorous evaluation ofnovel surgical therapies. JPediatr Surg. 2003;38:1429-1433. (Pubitemid 37238782)
3. Canty TG, Sr, Collins D, Losasso B, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy for simple and perforated appendicitis in children: the procedure of choice? J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35:1582-1585.
4. Hay SA. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 1998;13:21-23. (Pubitemid 28077385)
5. Mc Elearney S, Rodgers B. Pediatric laparoscopy: a review. Adv Pediatr. 2004;51:171-208. (Pubitemid 39303479)
6. Ure BM, Suempelmann R, Metzelder MM, et al. Physiological responses to endoscopic surgery in children. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2007;16:217-223. (Pubitemid 47539915)
7. United States Pharmacopenial Convention. United States Pharmacopoeia and the National Formulary Supplements, 26-NF 21. Easton, NJ: United States Pharmacopenial Convention; 2003.
8. Neuhaus SJ, Watson DI. Pneumoperitoneum and peritoneal surface changes: areview. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1316-1322. (Pubitemid 39166952)
9. Puttick MI, Scott-Coombes DM, Dye J, et al. Comparison ofimmunologic and physiologic effects of CO2 pneumoperitoneum atroom andbodytemperatures. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:572-575. (Pubitemid 29277226)
10. Ott DE. The peritoneum and the pneumoperitoneum: a review to improve clinical outcome. Gynecol Surg. 2004;1:101-106.
11. Ure BM, Niewold TA, Bax NM, et al. Peritoneal, systemic, and distant organ inflammatory responses are reduced by a laparoscopic approach and carbon dioxide versus air. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:836-842. (Pubitemid 34429448)
12. Bergstrom M, Falk P, Park PO, et al. Peritoneal and systemic p H during pneumoperitoneum with CO2 and helium in a pig model. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:359-364. (Pubitemid 351238220)
13. Wong YT, Shah PC, Birkett DH, et al. Peritoneal p H during laparoscopy is dependent on ambient gas environment: helium and nitrous oxide do not cause peritoneal acidosis. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:60-64. (Pubitemid 40487229)
14. Wong YT, Shah PC, Birkett DH, et al. Carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum causes severe peritoneal acidosis, unaltered by heating, humidification, or bi-carbonate in a porcine model. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1498-1503. (Pubitemid 39315080)
15. Hanly EJ, Aurora AR, Fuentes JM, et al. Abdominal insufflation with CO2 causes peritoneal acidosis independent of systemic p H. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:1245-1251; discussion 51-52.
16. Chekan EG, Nataraj C, Clary EM, et al. Intraperitoneal immunity and pneu-moperitoneum. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:1135-1138.
17. Mathew G, Watson DI, Ellis TS, et al. The role ofperitoneal immunity and the tumour-bearing state on the development of wound and peritoneal metastases after laparoscopy. Aust N Z J Surg. 1999;69:14-18. (Pubitemid 29051354)
18. Neuhaus SJ, Watson DI, Ellis T, et al. Influence ofgases on intraperitoneal im-munity during laparoscopy intumor-bearing rats. World J Surg. 2000;24:1227-1231.
19. Volz J, Koster S, Spacek Z, et al. Characteristic alterations of the peri-toneum after carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Surg Endosc. 1999;13: 611-614. (Pubitemid 29277235)
20. Hazebroek EJ, Schreve MA, Visser P, et al. Impact of temperature and humidity of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on body temperature and peritoneal morphology J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2002;12: 355-364. (Pubitemid 35266324)
21. Erikoglu M, Yol S, Avunduk MC, et al. Electron-microscopic alterations of the peritoneum after both cold and heated carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. J Surg Res. 2005;125:73-77. (Pubitemid 40523778)
22. Peng Y, Zheng M, Ye Q, et al. Heated and humidified CO2 prevents hy-pothermia, peritoneal injury, and intra-abdominal adhesions during prolonged laparoscopic insufflations. J Surg Res. 2009;151:40-47.
23. Almeida OD, Jr. Awake microlaparoscopy with the Insuflow device. JSLS. 2002;6:199-201.
24. Demco L. Effect of heating and humidifying gas on patients undergoing awake laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001;8:247-251. (Pubitemid 33020895)
25. Bessell JR, Karatassas A, Patterson JR, et al. Hypothermia induced by laparo-scopic insufflation. Surg Endosc. 1995;9:791-796.
26. Bessell JR, Ludbrook G, Millard SH, et al. Humidified gas prevents hypother-mia induced by laparoscopic insufflation: a randomized controlled study in a pigmodel. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:101-105. (Pubitemid 29156645)
27. Nguyen NT, Furdui G, Fleming NW, et al. Effect of heated and humidified carbon dioxide gas on core temperature and postoperative pain: a randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1050-1054. (Pubitemid 34747499)
28. Cote CJ, Lerna J, Todres ID. A Practice of Anesthesia for Infants and Children. Portland, OR: Elsevier Saunders Health Sciences; 2008:565-566.
29. Ott DE, Reich H, Love B, et al. Reduction oflaparoscopic-induced hypother-mia, postoperative pain and recovery room length of stay by pre-conditioning gas withthe Insuflow device: a prospective randomized controlledmulti-center study. JSLS. 1998;2:321-329.
30. Farley DR, Greenlee SM, Larson DR, et al. Double-blind, prospective, ran-domized study ofwarmed, humidified carbon dioxide insufflation vs standard carbon dioxide for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy Arch Surg. 2004;139:739-743; discussion43-44.
31. Sammour T, Kahokehr A, Hill AG. Independent testing of the Fisher & Paykel Healthcare MR860 Laparoscopic Humidification System. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010;19:219-223.
32. MR860 Humidifier Technical Manual. Revision D (185043798). Auckland, NZ: Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd; 2008.
33. Lawlor P, Pereira J, Bruera E. Dose ratios among different opioids: underlying issues and an update on the use of the equianalgesic table. In: Bruera E, Portenoy R, eds. Topics in Palliative Care. Vol 5. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2001:247-276.
34. Pereira J, Lawlor P, Vigano A, et al. Equianalgesic dose ratios for opioids. a critical review and proposals for long-term dosing. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001;22:672-687. (Pubitemid 32725810)
35. Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. Peds QL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy andpatient populations. Med Care. 2001;39:800-812. (Pubitemid 33686263)
36. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classifi-cation of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250: 187-196.
37. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:726-732.
38. Sammour T, Kahokehr A, Hill AG. Meta-analysis of the effect of warm humidified insufflation on pain after laparoscopy Br J Surg. 2008;95:950-956.
39. Sajid MS, Mallick AS, Rimpel J, et al. Effect ofheated and humidified car-bon dioxide on patients after laparoscopic procedures: a meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008;18:539-546.
40. (2) with or without humid-ification for minimally invasive abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;1:CD007821.
41. Mouton WG, Bessell JR, Otten KT, et al. Pain after laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:445-448. (Pubitemid 29236521)
42. Reeves M. The influence of age on sample size calculation in acute pain trials using morphine consumption as an endpoint. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:1186-1190.
43. Mc Grath PJ, Unruh AM. Measurement assessment Of paediatric pain. In: Wall ED, Melzack R, eds. Textbook of Pain. 4th ed. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 1999:371-394.
44. Binda MM, Molinas CR, Hansen P, et al. Effect of desiccation and temperature during laparoscopy on adhesion formation in mice. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:166-175. (Pubitemid 43962977)
45. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with the Society of Reproductive Surgeons. Pathogenesis, consequences, and control of peritoneal adhesions in gynecologic surgery. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:S144-S149.
46. Ott DE. Laparoscopy and adhesion formation, adhesions and laparoscopy. Semin Reprod Med. 2008;26:322-330.
47. Binda MM, Koninckx PR. Prevention of adhesion formation in a laparoscopic mouse model should combine local treatment with peritoneal cavity condition-ing. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1473-1479.