Visual perception II: High-level vision

Handbook of Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 48-70

  Hayward, William G ^a   Tarr, Michael J ^b  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871603367     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781848608177.n2     Document Type: Chapter

References (97)

1. BiedermanI. Human image understanding: recent research and a theory Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 32 (1985) 29-73 doi:10.1016/0734-189X(85)90002-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0734-189X%2885%2990002-7
2. Biederman I. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: a review of recent research and theory Spatial Vision 13 (2000) 241-253 doi:10.1163/156856800741063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156856800741063
3. Biederman I., Bar M. One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects Vision Research 39 (1999) 2885-2899 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00309-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2898%2900309-5
4. Biederman I., Bar M. Differing views on views: response to Hayward and Tarr (2000) Vision Research 40 (2000) 3901-3905 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00180-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2800%2900180-2
5. Biederman I., Cooper E. E. Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming Perception 20 (1991a) 585-593 doi:10.1068/p200585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p200585
6. Biederman I., Cooper E. E. Priming contour-deleted images: evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition Cognitive Psychology 23 (1991b) 393-419 doi:10.1016/0010-0285(91)90014-F http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285%2891%2990014-F
7. Biederman I., Cooper E. E. Size invariance in visual object priming Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 (1992) 121-133 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.1.121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.1.121
8. Biederman I., Gerhardstein P. C. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 (1993) 1162-1182 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.19.6.1162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.19.6.1162
9. Biederman I., Gerhardstein P. C. Viewpointdependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: reply to Tarr and Bolthoff (1995) Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 1506-1514 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.6.1506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.6.1506
10. Biederman I., Subramaniam S., Bar M., Kaloscai P., Fiser J. Subordinate-level object classification reexamined Psychological Research 62 (1999) 131-153 doi:10.1007/s004260050047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004260050047
11. Binford, T. O. (1971, December). Visual perception by computer. Paper presented at the IEEE Conference on Systems and Control, Miami, FL.
12. Bricolo, E., Poggio, T., & Logothetis, N. K. (1997). 3-D object recognition: a model of view-tuned neurons. In M.C. Mozer, M.I. Jordan, & T. Petsche (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 9 (pp. 41-47). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Brooks R. A. Model-based three-dimensional interpretations of two-dimensional images IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 5 (1983) 140-149 doi:10.1109/TPAMI.1983.4767366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1983.4767366
14. Bolthoff H. H., Edelman S. Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 89 (1992) 60-64 doi:10.1073/pnas.89.1.60 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.1.60
15. Corballis M. C. Recognition of disoriented shapes Psychological Review 95 (12) (1988) 115-123
16. Edelman, S. (1999). Representation and recognition in vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Farah, M. J. (1990). Visual agnosia: disorders of object recognition and what they tell us about normal vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Farah M. J. Is an object an object an object? Cognitive and neuropsychological investigations of domain-specificity in visual object recognition Current Directions in Psychological Science 1 (1992) 164-169 doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep11510333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep11510333
19. Fiser J., Biederman I. Invariance of long-term visual priming to scale, reflection, translation, and hemisphere Vision Research 41 (2001) 221-234 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00234-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2800%2900234-0
20. Foley, J., Van Dam, A., Feiner, S., & Hughes, J. (1990). Computer graphics principles and practice (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
21. Gauthier I. What constrains the organization of the ventral temporal cortex? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 1-2 doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01416-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613%2899%2901416-3
22. Gauthier I., Anderson A. W., Tarr M. J., Skudlarski P., Gore J. C. Levels of categorization in visual recognition studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging Current Biology 7 (1997) 645-651 doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00291-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822%2806%2900291-0
23. Gauthier I., Hayward W. G., Tarr M. J., Anderson A. W., Skudlarski P., Gore J. C. BOLD activity during mental rotation and viewpoint-dependent object recognition Neuron 34 (2002) 161-171 doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00622-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273%2802%2900622-0
24. Gauthier I., Skudlarski P., Gore J. C., Anderson A. W. Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition Nature Neuroscience 3 (2000) 191-197 doi:10.1038/72140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/72140
25. Gauthier I., Tarr M. J. Becoming a ‘Greeble’ expert: exploring the face recognition mechanism Vision Research 37 (1997) 1673-1682 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00286-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2896%2900286-6
26. Gauthier I., Tarr M. J., Anderson A. W., Skudlarski P., Gore J. C. Activation of the middle fusiform ‘face area’ increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects Nature Neuroscience 2 (1999) 568-573 doi:10.1038/9224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/9224
27. Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
28. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
29. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
30. Gregory R. L. Vision with isoluminant colour contrast. 1. A projection technique and observations Perception 6 (1977) 113-119 doi:10.1068/p060113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p060113
31. Hayward W. G. Effects of outline shape in object recognition Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 427-440 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.2.427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.2.427
32. Hayward W. G., Tarr M. J. Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 1511-1521 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.23.5.1511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.23.5.1511
33. Hayward W. G., Tarr M. J. Differing views on views: reply to Biederman and Bar (1999) Vision Research 40 (2000) 3895-3899 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00179-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2800%2900179-6
34. Hayward W. G., Williams P. Viewpoint dependence and object discriminability Psychological Science 11 (2000) 7-12 doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00207
35. Hecht S., Shlaer S., Pirenne M. H. Energy, quanta, and vision Journal of General Physiology 25 (1942) 819-840 doi:10.1085/jgp.25.6.819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.25.6.819
36. Hietanen J. K., Perrett D. I., Oram M. W., Benson P. J., Dittrich W. H. The effects of lighting conditions on responses of cells selective for face views in the macaque temporal cortex Experimental Brain Research 89 (1992) 151-171
37. Hoffman D. D., Richards W. Parts of recognition Cognition 18 (1984) 65-96 doi:10.1016/0010-0277(84)90022-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277%2884%2990022-2
38. Horn, B. K. P. (1986). Robot vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Hubel D. H., Wiesel T. N. Receptive fields of single neurons in the cat's striate cortex Journal of Physiology 148 (1959) 574-591
40. Hubel D. H., Wiesel T. N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex Journal of Physiology 160 (1962) 106-154
41. Hummel J. E., Biederman I. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition Psychological Review 99 (1992) 480-517 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.480
42. Humphrey G. K., Khan S. C. Recognizing novel views of three-dimensional objects Canadian Journal of Psychology 46 (1992) 170-190 doi:10.1037/h0084320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0084320
43. Ishai A., Ungerleider L. G., Martin A., Haxby J. V. The representation of objects in the human occipital and temporal cortex Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12 (Suppl. 2) (2000) 35-51 doi:10.1162/089892900564055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/089892900564055
44. Johnston A., Hill H., Carman N. Recognising faces: effects of lighting direction, inversion, and brightness reversal Perception 21 (1992) 365-375 doi:10.1068/p210365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p210365
45. Johnston M. B., Hayes A. An experimental comparison of viewpoint-specific and viewpointindependent models of object representation Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 53 (2000) 792-824 doi:10.1080/713755903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713755903
46. Jolicoeur P. The time to name disoriented natural objects Memory and Cognition 13 (1985) 289-303
47. Jolicoeur P. A size-congruency effect in memory for visual shape Memory and Cognition 15 (1987) 531-543
48. Jolicoeur P. Identification of disoriented objects: a dual-systems theory Mind and Language 5 (1990) 387-410 doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.1990.tb00170.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1990.tb00170.x
49. Jolicoeur P., Gluck M., Kosslyn S. M. Pictures and names: making the connection Cognitive Psychology 16 (1984) 243-275 doi:10.1016/0010-0285(84)90009-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285%2884%2990009-4
50. Kanwisher N. Domain specificity in face perception Nature Neuroscience 3 (2000) 759-763 doi:10.1038/77664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/77664
51. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., Chun M. M. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception Journal of Neuroscience 17 (1997) 4302-4311
52. Kersten D., Mamassian P., Knill D. C. Moving cast shadows induce apparent motion in depth Perception 26 (1997) 171-192 doi:10.1068/p260171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p260171
53. Koenderink, J. J. (1987). An internal representation for solid shape based on the topological properties of the apparent contour. In W. Richards & S. Ullman (Eds.), Image understanding: 1985-86 (pp. 257-285). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
54. Knig A., Brodhun E. Experimentelle Untersuchungen ober die psychophysie Fundamentalformel in Bezug auf den Gesichtssinn Sitzungsberichteder Preussische Akademie Wissenschaften, Berlin 27 (1889) 641-644
55. Lissauer H. Ein Fall von Seelenblindheit nebst einem Beitrage zur Theory derselben Archiv for Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten 21 (1890) 222-270 doi:10.1007/BF02226765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02226765
56. Lowe, D. G. (1985). Perceptual organization and visual recognition. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
57. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: Freeman.
58. Marr D., Hildreth E. Theory of edge detection Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 207 (1980) 187-217 doi:10.1098/rspb.1980.0020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1980.0020
59. Marr D., Nishihara H. K. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of threedimensional shapes Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 200 (1978) 269-294 doi:10.1098/rspb.1978.0020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1978.0020
60. Mel B. SEEMORE: combining color, shape, and texture histogramming in a neurally inspired approach to visual object recognition Neural Computation 9 (1997) 779-804
61. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62. Palmer, S., Rosch, E., & Chase, P. (1981). Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 135-151). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63. Perrett D. I., Harries M. H., Bevan R., Thomas S., Benson P. J., Mistlin A. J., Chitty A. J., Hietanen J. K., Ortega J. E. Frameworks of analysis for the neural representations of animate objects and actions Journal of Experimental Biology 146 (1989) 87-113
64. Pinker S. Visual cognition: an introduction Cognition 18 (1984) 1-63 doi:10.1016/0010-0277(84)90021-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277%2884%2990021-0
65. Poggio T., Edelman S. A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects Nature 343 (1990) 263-266 doi:10.1038/343263a0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/343263a0
66. Rhodes G., Brennan S., Carey S. Identification and ratings of caricatures: implications for mental representations of faces Cognitive Psychology 19 (1987) 473-497 doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90016-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285%2887%2990016-8
67. Rhodes G., McLean I. G. Distinctiveness and expertise effects with homogeneous stimuli: towards a model of configural coding Perception 19 (1990) 773-794 doi:10.1068/p190773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p190773
68. Riesenhuber M., Poggio T. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex Nature Neuroscience 2 (1999) 1019-1025
69. Rock I., DiVita J. A case of viewer-centered object perception Cognitive Psychology 19 (1987) 280-293 doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90013-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285%2887%2990013-2
70. Rosch E., Mervis C. B., Gray W. D., Johnson D. M., Boyes-Braem P. Basic objects in natural categories Cognitive Psychology 8 (1976) 382-439 doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285%2876%2990013-X
71. Shepard R. N. Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming Psychological Review 91 (44) (1984) 417-447
72. Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
73. Shepard R. N., Metzler J. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects Science 171 (1971) 701-703 doi:10.1126/science.171.3972.701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3972.701
74. Srinivas K. Perceptual specificity in nonverbal priming Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19 (1993) 582-602 doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.3.582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.3.582
75. Srinivas K. Representation of rotated objects in explicit and implicit memory Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 (1995) 1019-1036 doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.1019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.1019
76. Tanaka J. W., Farah M. J. Parts and wholes in face recognition Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 46 (1993) 225-245 doi:10.1080/14640749308401045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14640749308401045
77. Tanaka J. W., Presnell L. M. Color diagnosticity in object recognition Perception and Psychophysics 61 (1999) 1140-1153 doi:10.3758/BF03207619 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03207619
78. Tarr M. J. Rotating objects to recognize them: a case study of the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2 (1995) 55-82 doi:10.3758/BF03214412 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03214412
79. Tarr, M. J. (2003). Visual object recognition: can a single mechanism suffice? In M. A. Peterson & G. Rhodes (Eds.), Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: analytic and holistic processes (pp. 177-211). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
80. Tarr M. J., Bolthoff H. H. Is human object recognition better described by geonstructural descriptions or by multiple-views? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 1494-1505 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.6.1494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.6.1494
81. Tarr M. J., Bolthoff H. H., Zabinski M., Blanz V. To what extent do unique parts influence recognition across changes in viewpoint? Psychological Science 8 (1997) 282-289 doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00439.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00439.x
82. Tarr M. J., Gauthier I. FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise Nature Neuroscience 3 (2000) 764-769 doi:10.1038/77666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/77666
83. Tarr M. J., Kersten D., Bolthoff H. H. Why the visual system might encode the effects of illumination Vision Research 38 (1998) 2259-2275 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00041-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2898%2900041-8
84. Tarr M. J., Kriegman D. J. What defines a view? Vision Research 41 (2001) 1981-2004 doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00024-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989%2801%2900024-4
85. Tarr M. J., Pinker S. Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition Cognitive Psychology 21 (1989) 233-282 doi:10.1016/0010-0285(89)90009-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285%2889%2990009-1
86. Tarr M. J., Williams P., Hayward W. G., Gauthier I. Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint-dependent Nature Neuroscience 1 (1998) 275-277 doi:10.1038/1089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/1089
87. Ullman S. Aligning pictorial descriptions: an approach to object recognition Cognition 32 (1989) 193-254 doi:10.1016/0010-0277(89)90036-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277%2889%2990036-X
88. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D.J. Ingle, M.A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
89. Wagemans J., Van Gool L., Lamote C. The visual system's measurement of invariants need not itself be invariant Psychological Science 7 (1996) 232-236 doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00365.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00365.x
90. Waltz, D. L. (1975). Understanding line drawings of scenes with shadows. In P. H. Winston (ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 19-91). New York: McGraw-Hill.
91. Warrington E. K., Taylor A. M. The contribution of right parietal lobe to object recognition Cortex 9 (1973) 152-164
92. Wheatstone C. Contributions to the physiology of vision, Part 1: On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 128 (1838) 371-394 doi:10.1098/rstl.1838.0019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1838.0019
93. Williams P., Tarr M. J. Orientation-specific possibility priming for novel three-dimensional objects Perception and Psychophysics 61 (1999) 963-976 doi:10.3758/BF03206910 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03206910
94. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Philosophische Untersuchungen. New York: Macmillan.
95. Wong, C-N., & Hayward, W. G. (2002). View generalization in object recognition by pooled activation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
96. Wurm L. H., Legge G. E., Isenberg L. M., Luebker A. Color improves object recognition in normal and low vision Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 (1993) 899-911 doi:10.1037/0096-1523.19.4.899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.19.4.899
97. Yin R. K. Looking at upside-down faces Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1969) 141-145 doi:10.1037/h0027474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0027474