Note-taking in co-located collaborative visual analytics: Analysis of an observational study

Information Visualization

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 190-204

  Mahyar, Narges ^a   Sarvghad, Ali ^a   Tory, Melanie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

collaboration; history; interactive surfaces; Note taking; provenance

Indexed keywords

CO-LOCATED; COLLABORATION; INTERACTIVE SURFACES; NOTE-TAKING; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PROVENANCE; RECORDING MATERIALS; RECORDKEEPING; TABLETOP DISPLAYS; VISUAL ANALYSIS; VISUAL ANALYTICS; VISUAL DATA ANALYSIS;

HISTORY; RECORDS MANAGEMENT; VISUALIZATION;

DATA VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84871602129     PISSN: 14738716     EISSN: 14738724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473871611433713     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Lipford HR, Stukes F, Dou W, et al. Helping users recall their reasoning process. Visual analytics science and technology (VAST) ; Salt Lake City, UT, 2010, pp.187-194. New York: IEEE.
2. Heer J, van Ham F, Carpendale S, et al. Creation and collaboration: engaging new audiences for information visualization. Inf Visual. 2008 ; 4950: 92-133
3. Isenberg P, Carpendale S. Interactive tree comparison for co-located collaborative information visualization. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics. 2007 ; 13 (6). 1232-1239
4. Rogers Y, Lindley S. Collaborating around large interactive displays: which way is best to meet. Interact Comput. 2004 ; 16 (6). 1133-1152
5. Forlines C, Esenther A, Shen C, et al. Multi-user, multidisplay interaction with a single-user, single-display geospatial application. Proceedings of ACM symposium on user interface software and technology ; Montreux, Switzerland, 15 October 2006, pp.273276. New York: ACM.
6. Forlines C, Shen C. DTLens: multi-user tabletop spatial data exploration. Proceedings of ACM symposium on user interface software and technology ; Seattle, WA, USA, 23 October 2005, pp.119-122. New York: ACM.
7. Isenberg P, Fisher D. Collaborative brushing and linking for co-located visual analytics of document collections. Comput Graphics Forum. 2009 ; 28 (3). 1031-1038
8. Tobiasz M, Isenberg P, Carpendale S. Lark: coordinating co-located collaboration with information visualization. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics. 2009 ; 15 (6). 1065-1072
9. Vernier F, Lesh N, Shen C. Visualization techniques for circular tabletop interfaces. Proceedings of the working conference on advanced visual interfaces ; Trento, Italy, 22 May 2002, pp.257-265. New York: ACM.
10. Heer J, Mackinlay J, Stolte C, et al. Graphical histories for visualization: supporting analysis, communication, and evaluation. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics. 2008 ; 14 (6). 1189-1196
11. Shrinivasan YB, Gotzy D, Lu J. Connecting the dots in visual analysis. IEEE symposium on visual analytics science and technology ; Atlantic City, NJ, USA, 12 Oct 2009, pp.123130. New York: IEEE.
12. Viegas FB, Wattenberg M, van Ham F, et al. ManyEyes: a site for visualization at internet scale. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics. 2007 ; 13 (6). 1121-1128
13. Mahyar N, Sarvghad A, Tory M. A closer look at note taking in the co-located collaborative visual analytics process. Proceedings of IEEE conference on visual analytics science and technology (VAST 10) ; Salt Lake City, UT, 25 Oct 2010, pp.171178. New York: IEEE.
14. SAP Business Objects. Explorer in the cloud, https://create.ondemand.com/ explorer (accessed 30 June 2010).
15. Tang A, Tory M, Po B, et al. Collaborative coupling over tabletop displays. Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI 2006 ; Montréal, Canada ;2227 April 2006, pp.1181-1190. New York: ACM.
16. Isenberg P, Tang A, Carpendale S. An exploratory study of co-located collaborative visual analytics around a tabletop display. Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI 2008 ; Florence, Italy, 5-10 April 2008, pp.1217-1226. New York: ACM.
17. Card S, Mackinlay JD, Shneiderman B Readings in information visualization: using vision to think. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kauffman ; 1999 :
18. Mark G, Kobsa A. The effects of collaboration and system transparency on CIVE usage: an empirical study and model. Presence Teleop Virt Environ. 2005 ; 14 (1). 60-80
19. Park KS, Kapoor A, Leigh J. Lessons learned from employing multiple perspectives in a collaborative virtual environment for visualizing scientific data. Proceedings of conference on collaborative virtual environments ; San Francisco, California, USA, 10 September 2000, pp.73-82. New York: ACM.
20. Robinson AC. Collaborative synthesis of visual analytic results. IEEE symposium on visual analytics science and technology ; Columbus, Ohio, USA, 19 October 2008, pp.6774. New York: IEEE.
21. Scott SD, Grant KD, Mandryk RL. System guidelines for co-located, collaborative work on a tabletop display. Proceedings of conference on computer supported cooperative work. Helsinki, Finland, 14 September 2003, pp.159-178. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
22. Gotz D, Zhou MX. Characterizing users' visual analytic activity for insight provenance. Inf Visual. 2009 ; 8 (1). 42-55
23. Heer J, Viégas FB, Wattenberg M. Voyagers and voyeurs: supporting asynchronous collaborative visualization. Commun ACM. 2007 ; 52 (1). 87-97
24. Shneiderman B. The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. Proceedings of IEEE symposium on visual languages ; Boulder, CO, USA, 3 September 1996, pp.336-343. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE CS Press.
25. Meng C, Yasue M, Imamiya A, et al. Visualizing histories for selective undo and redo. Proceedings of Asia Pacific computer human interaction ; Kangawa, Japan, 15 July 1998, pp.459-464. New York: IEEE.
26. O'Hara K, Sellen A. A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents. Proceedings of the human factors in computing systems ; Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 22 March 1997, pp.335-342. New York: ACM.
27. Oinn T, Addis M, Ferris J, et al. Taverna: a tool for the composition and enactment of bioinformatics workflows. Bioinformatics. 2004 ; 20 (17). 3045-3054
28. Gutwin C, Greenberg S. Design for individuals, design for groups: tradeoffs between power and workspace awareness. Proceedings of computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) ; Seattle, Washington, USA, 14 November 1998, pp.207-216. New York: ACM.
29. Mark G, Carpenter K, Kobsa A. A model of synchronous collaborative information visualization. Proceedings of information visualization ; London, UK, 16 July 2003, pp.373-381. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
30. Sarvghad A, Mahyar N, Tory M. History tools for collaborative visualization. Proceedings of workshop on collaborative visualization on interactive surfaces (CoVIS) ; Atlantic City, USA, 22 October 2009, pp.21-23. New York: IEEE.
31. Hartley J. Notetaking in non-academic settings: a review. Appl Cognit Psychol. 2002 ; 16 (5). 559-574
32. Boch F, Piolat A. Note taking and learning: a summary of research. WAC J. 2005 ; 16: 101-113
33. Bretzing B. Notetaking and depth of processing. Contemp Educ Psychol. 1979 ; 4 (2). 145-153
34. Isenberg T, Neumann P, Carpendale S, et al. Interactive annotations on large, high-resolution information displays. Proceedings of the IEEE VIS/InfoVis/VAST ; Los Alamitos, CA, 29 October 2006, pp.124-125. New York: IEEE.
35. Kadivar N, Chen V, Dunsmuir D, et al. Capturing and supporting the analysis process. IEEE Symposium on visual analytics science and technology ; Atlantic City, USA, 22 October 2009, pp.131-138. New York: IEEE.
36. MarshallCC. Work practices study: analysts and note taking. Unpublished report, http://www.csdl.tamu.edu/∼marshall/oswrstudy.pdf (1990, accessed 30 June 2010).
37. Shrinivasan YB, van Wijk JJ. Supporting the analytical reasoning process in information visualization. Proceedings of human factors in computing systems (CHI 08) ; Florence, Italy, 5 April 2008, pp.1237-1246. New York: ACM.
38. Ellis SE, Groth DP. A collaborative annotation system for data visualization. Proceedings of the working conference on advanced visual interfaces ; Gallipoli, Italy ;. 411.
39. Gotz D, Zhou M, Aggarwal V. Interactive visual synthesis of analytic knowledge. 2006 IEEE symposium on visual analytics and technology ; Baltimore, MD, USA, 31 October 2006, pp.51-58. New York: IEEE.
40. Heer J, Agrawala M. Design considerations for collaborative visual analytics. Inf Visual. 2008 ; 7 (1). 49-62
41. Scott SD, Sheelagh M, Carpendale T, et al. Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces. Proceedings of conference on computer supported cooperative work ; Chicago, Illinois, USA, 16 November 2004, pp.294-303. New York: ACM.
42. Jankun-Kelly TJ, Ma K-L, Gertz M. A model and framework for visualization exploration. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics. 2007 ; 13 (2). 357-369
43. Kiewra KA, Benton SL, Kim S, et al. Effects of note-taking format and study technique on recall and relational performance. Contemp Educ Psychol. 1995 ; 20: 172-187
44. Maquil V, Psik T, Wagner I. The ColorTable: a design story. Proceedings of tangible and embedded interaction ; Bonn, Germany, 18 February 2008, pp.97-104. New York: ACM.
45. Sellen AJ, Harper RH The myth of the paperless office. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press ; 2003 :
46. Terrenghi L, Kirk D, Sellen A, et al. Affordances for manipulation of physical versus digital media on interactive surfaces. Proceedings of human factors in computing systems ; San Jose, California, USA, 28 April 2007, pp.1157-1166. New York: ACM.
47. Simmel G. The number of members as determining the sociological form of the group. Am J Sociol. 1902 ; 8: 1-46