Marine protected areas: Re-thinking their inception

Marine Policy

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 234-240

  Chuenpagdee, Ratana ^a   Pascual Fernández, Jose J ^b   Szeliánszky, Emese ^b   Luis Alegret, Juan ^c   Fraga, Julia ^d   Jentoft, Svein ^e  

^a MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GIRONA   (Spain)

^d DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA APLICADA   (Mexico)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

Author keywords

Interactive governance; Marine protected areas; M xico; Power and politics; Pre implementation; Spain

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; MARINE PARK; STAKEHOLDER;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; SPAIN;

EID: 84871580060     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.10.016     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Brady M., Waldo S. Fixing problems in fisheries-integrating ITQs, CBM and MPAs in management. Mar Policy 2009, 33:258-263.
2. Degnbol P., Gislason H., Hanna S., Jentoft S., Raakjaer Nielsen J., Sverdrup-Jensen S., et al. Painting the floor with a hammer: technical fixes in fisheries management. Mar Policy 2006, 30:534-543.
3. Johannes R.E. Traditional marine conservation methods in Oceania and their demise. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1978, 9:349-364.
4. Johannes R.E. Traditional conservation methods and protected marine areas in Oceania. AMBIO-J Hum Environ 1982, 11:258-261.
5. National Research Council Marine protected areas: tools for sustaining oceans ecosystems 2001, National Academy Press, Washington.
6. Adams AB. First world conference on national parks. Washington: National Park Service; 1962.
7. Rudd M.A., Tupper M.H., Folmer H., van Kooten G.C. Policy analysis for tropical marine reserves: challenges and directions. Fish Fish 2003, 4:65-85.
8. Roncin N., Alban F., Charbonnel E., Crec'hriou R., de la Cruz Modino R., Culioli J.-M., et al. Uses of ecosystem services provided by MPAs: How much do they impact the local economy? A southern Europe perspective. J Nat Conserv 2008, 16:256-270.
9. CBD-UNEP. Report of the Eighth Meeting of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (Reissued for technical reasons), Curitiba, Brazil 20-31 March 2006. Curitiba, Brazil: UNEP. ; 2006 [accessed 15.11.09]. http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/cop/cop-08/official/cop-08-31-en.pdf.
10. Cressey D. Ocean conservation: uncertain sanctuary. Nature 2011, 480:166-167.
11. Toropova C., Meliane I., Laffoley D., Matthews E., Spalding M. Global ocean protection: present status and future possibilities 2010, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
12. Wood L.J., Fish L., Laughren J., Pauly D. Assessing progress towards global marine protection targets: shortfalls in information and action. Oryx 2008, 42:340-351.
13. Mora C., Andrefouet S., Costello M.J., Kranenburg C., Rollo A., Veron J., et al. Coral reefs and the global network of marine protected areas. Science 2006, 312:1750-1751.
14. Jameson S.C., Tupper M.H., Ridley J.M. The three screen doors: Can marine protected areas be effective?. Mar Pollut Bull 2002, 44:1177-1183.
15. Charles A., Wilson L. Human dimensions of marine protected areas. ICES J Mar Sci 2009, 66:6-15.
16. Pollnac R.B., Crawford B.R., Gorospe MLG Discovering factors that influence the success of community-based marine protected areas in the Visayas, Philippines. Ocean Coastal Manage 2001, 44:683-710.
17. Pomeroy R.S., Parks J.E., Watson L.M. How is your MPA doing? A guidebook of natural and social indicators for evaluating marine protected area management effectiveness 2004, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
18. Chuenpagdee R., Jentoft S. Step zero for fisheries co-management: what precedes implementation. Mar Policy 2007, 31:657-668.
19. Jentoft S. In the power of power: the understated aspect of fisheries and coastal management. Hum O 2007, 66:426-437.
20. Charles A.T. Beyond the status quo: rethinking fishery management. Reinventing Fisheries Management 2001, 101-111. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. T.J. Pitcher, P.J.B. Hart, D. Pauly (Eds.).
21. Kelleher G., Bleakley C., Wells S. A global representative system of marine protected areas 1995, IUCN, World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland.
22. Acheson J.M. Institutional failure in resource management. Annu Rev Anthropol 2006, 35:117-134.
23. Jentoft S., Pascual-Fernandez J., De la Cruz Modino R., Gonzalez-Ramallal M., Chuenpagdee R. What stakeholders think about marine protected areas: case studies from Spain. Hum Ecol 2012, 40:185-197.
24. Jentoft S., Chuenpagdee R., Pascual-Fernandez J.J. What are MPAs for: on goal formation and displacement. Ocean Coastal Manage 2011, 54:75-83.
25. Christie P. Marine protected areas as biological successes and social failures in Southeast Asia 2004, 42. American Fisheries Society Symposium, [pp. 155-64].
26. Christie P., McCay B.J., Miller M.L., Lowe C., White A.T., Stoffle R., et al. Toward developing a complete understanding: a social science research agenda for marine protected areas. Fisheries 2003, 28:22-26.
27. Carneiro G. The Luiz Saldanha Marine Park: an overview of conflicting perceptions. Conserv Soc 2011, 9:325-333.
28. Hughey K.F.D. An evaluation of a management saga: the Banks Peninsula Marine Mammal Sanctuary, New Zealand. J Environ Manage 2000, 58:179-197.
29. Gleason M., McCreary S., Miller-Henson M., Ugoretz J., Fox E., Merrifield M., et al. Science-based and stakeholder-driven marine protected area network planning: a successful case study from north central California. Ocean Coastal Manage 2010, 53:52-68.
30. Sowman M., Hauck M., Van Sittert L., Sunde J. Marine protected area management in South Africa: new policies, old paradigms. Environ Manage 2011, 47:573-583.
31. Kooiman J., Bavinck M., Jentoft S., Pullin R. Fish for Life: Interactive Governance for Fisheries 2005, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.
32. Bavinck M. Understanding fisheries conflicts in the South-a legal pluralist perspective. Soc Nat Resour 2005, 18:805-820.
33. Goffman E. The nature of deference and demeanor. Am Anthropol 1956, 58:473-502.
34. Gonzalez C., Jentoft S. MPA in labor: securing the Pearl Cays of Nicaragua. Environ Manage 2011, 47:617-629.
35. Swartz M.J., Turner V.W., Tuden A. Political anthropology 1966, Aldine, Chicago.
36. Berger P.L., Luckmann T. The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge 1966, Anchor Books/Doubleday, New York.
37. Pascual-Fernández J. Participative management of artisanal fisheries in the Canary Islands. Southern Waters: Issues of Management and Practice 1999, 66-77. Blackwell's Science, Fishing New Books, London. D. Symes (Ed.).
38. Foucault M. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 1980, Pantheon Books, New York. C. Gordon (Ed.).
39. Suárez de Vivero J.L., Frieyro de Lara M., Jurado Estevez J. Decentralization, regionalization and co-management: a critical view on the viability of the alternative management models for fisheries in Spain. Mar Policy 1997, 21:197-206.
40. Suárez de Vivero J.L., Frieyro de Lara M. Regions at sea: the administrative region as a base for an alternative fisheries management system for Spain. Ocean Coastal Manage 1997, 35:173-183.
41. Suman D., Shivlani M., Walter Milon J. Perceptions and attitudes regarding marine reserves: a comparison of stakeholder groups in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Ocean Coastal Manage 1999, 42:1019-1040.
42. Bustamante R., Wellington J., Troya R. In Galápagos, clashes between fishers and managers jeopardize conservation efforts. MPA News 2001, 2:1-3.
43. Buanes A., Jentoft S., Karlsen G.R., Maurstad A., Soreng S. In whose interest? An exploratory analysis of stakeholders in Norwegian coastal zone planning. Ocean Coastal Manage 2004, 47:207-223.
44. Mikalsen K.H., Jentoft S. From user-groups to stakeholders? The public interest in fisheries management. Mar Policy 2001, 25:281-292.