Box-Behnken experimental design for investigation of stability and thermal conductivity of TiO2 nanofluids

Journal of Nanoparticle Research

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Lotfizadehdehkordi, Babak ^a   Ghadimi, Azadeh ^a   Metselaar, Henk S C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Nanofluid; Response surface method; Stability; Thermal conductivity; UV Vis spectrophotometer

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA); CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; INFRARED SPECTROPHOTOMETERS; METEOROLOGICAL INSTRUMENTS; NANOFLUIDICS; OXIDE MINERALS; POLYNOMIALS; SONICATION; SPECTROPHOTOMETERS; STABILITY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

BOX-BEHNKEN EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HIGH THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY; NANOFLUIDS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SECOND-ORDER POLYNOMIAL EQUATIONS; THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT; UV-VIS SPECTROPHOTOMETERS;

THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY OF LIQUIDS;

TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); HEAT TRANSFER; NANOFLUIDICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY; ULTRASOUND; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

EID: 84871577843     PISSN: 13880764     EISSN: 1572896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-012-1369-4     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adinarayana K, Ellaiah P (2002) Response surface optimization of the critical medium components for the production of alkaline protease by a newly isolated Bacillus sp. J Pharm Pharm Sci 5(3):272-278 (Pubitemid 37207254)
2. Amrollahi A et al (2008) The effects of temperature, volume fraction and vibration time on the thermo-physical properties of a carbon nanotube suspension (carbon nanofluid). Nanotechnology 19(31):315701 (Pubitemid 351991702)
3. Can MY, Kaya Y, Algur OF (2006) Response surface optimization of the removal of nickel from aqueous solution by cone biomass of Pinus sylvestris. Bioresour Technol 97(14):1761-1765 (Pubitemid 43867279)
4. Chung SJ, Leonard JP, Nettleship I, Lee JK, Soong Y, Martello DV, Chyu MK (2009) Characterization of ZnO nanoparticle suspension in water: effectiveness of ultrasonic dispersion. Powder Technol 194(1-2):75-80
5. 2-water nanofluids. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 33(4):706-714
6. Duangthongsuk W, Wongwises S (2010) Comparison of the effects of measured and computed thermophysical properties of nanofluids on heat transfer performance. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 34(5):616-624. doi: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci. 2009.11.012
7. Eastman JA, Choi SUS, Li S, Yu W, Thompson LJ (2001) Anomalously increased effective thermal conductivities of ethylene glycol-based nanofluids containing copper nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 78(6):718-720 (Pubitemid 33630327)
8. Evans W, Prasher R, Fish J, Meakin P, Phelan P, Keblinski P (2008) Effect of aggregation and interfacial thermal resistance on thermal conductivity of nanocomposites and colloidal nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 51(5-6):1431-1438. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.10.017
9. Ghadimi A, Saidur R, Metselaar H (2011) A review of nanofluid stability properties and characterization in stationary conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transf 54(17-18):4051-4068
10. Gharagozloo PE, Goodson KE (2010) Aggregate fractal dimensions and thermal conduction in nanofluids. J Appl Phys 108:074309
11. 2 nanofluids flowing through a straight tube under the laminar flow conditions. Appl Therm Eng 29(10):1965-1972
12. Hong TK, Yang HS (2005) Nanoparticle-dispersion-dependent thermal conductivity in nanofluids. J Korean Phys Soc 47:S321-S324
13. Hong TK, Yang HS, Choi CJ (2005) Study of the enhanced thermal conductivity of Fe nanofluids. J Appl Phys 97(6):064311-064314 (Pubitemid 40818186)
14. Hong KS, Hong TK, Yang HS (2006) Thermal conductivity of Fe nanofluids depending on the cluster size of nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 88(3):031901-031903 (Pubitemid 43133668)
15. Hwang Y, Lee JK, Lee CH, Jung YM, Cheong SI, Lee CG, Ku BC, Jang SP (2007) Stability and thermal conductivity characteristics of nanofluids. Thermochim Acta 455(1-2):70-74. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2006.11.036 (Pubitemid 46335810)
16. Jiang L, Gao L, Sun J (2003) Production of aqueous colloidal dispersions of carbon nanotubes. J Colloid Interface Sci 260(1):89-94. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9797(02)00176-5 (Pubitemid 36398190)
17. Khajeh M (2011) Response surface modelling of lead pre-concentration from food samples by miniaturised homogenous liquid-liquid solvent extraction: Box-Behnken design. Food Chem 129(4):1832-1838. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.05. 123
18. Kim SH, Choi SR, Kim D (2007) Thermal conductivity of metal-oxide nanofluids: particle size dependence and effect of laser irradiation. J Heat Transfer 129:298 (Pubitemid 47315820)
19. Kleinstreuer C, Feng Y (2011) Experimental and theoretical studies of nanofluid thermal conductivity enhancement: a review. Nanoscale Res Lett
20. Kole M, Dey TK (2012) Effect of prolonged ultrasonication on the thermal conductivity of ZnO-ethylene glycol nanofluids. Thermochim Acta 535:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2012.02.016
21. Kwak K, Kim C (2005) Viscosity and thermal conductivity of copper oxide nanofluid dispersed in ethylene glycol. Korea Aust Rheol J 17(2):35-40 (Pubitemid 43057318)
22. 3 nanoparticles. Int J Heat Mass Transf 51(11-12):2651-2656. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.10.026
23. Li X, Zhu D, Wang X (2007) Evaluation on dispersion behavior of the aqueous copper nano-suspensions. J Colloid Interface Sci 310(2):456-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.02.067 (Pubitemid 46654032)
24. 3 nanofluids prepared through ultrasonic vibration. Appl Energy 88(12):4527-4533
25. Liu HL, Lan YW, Cheng YC (2004) Optimal production of sulphuric acid by Thiobacillus thiooxidans using response surface methodology. Process Biochem 39(12):1953-1961 (Pubitemid 39123585)
26. 2-water based nanofluids. Int J Therm Sci 44(4):367-373 (Pubitemid 40324857)
27. Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM (2009) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, vol 705. Wiley, New York
28. Özerinç S, Kakaç S, YazIcIoǧlu AG (2010) Enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluids: a state-of-the-art review. Microfluid Nanofluid 8(2):145-170
29. Sen R, Swaminathan T (2004) Response surface modeling and optimization to elucidate and analyze the effects of inoculum age and size on surfactin production. Biochem Eng J 21(2):141-148. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2004.06.006 (Pubitemid 39180073)
30. Sergis A, Hardalupas Y (2011) Anomalous heat transfer modes of nanofluids: a review based on statistical analysis. Nanoscale Res Lett 6. doi: 39110.1186/1556-276x-6-391
31. Timofeeva EV, Gavrilov AN, McCloskey JM, Tolmachev YV, Sprunt S, Lopatina LM, Selinger JV (2007) Thermal conductivity and particle agglomeration in alumina nanofluids: experiment and theory. Phys Rev E 76(6):061203
32. 2-R141b nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 52(5-6):1582-1588
33. 2 nanofluids. Int J Thermophys 30(4):1213-1226
34. Wang XJ, Zhu DS, Yang S (2009) Investigation of pH and SDBS on enhancement of thermal conductivity in nanofluids. Chem Phys Lett 470(1-3):107-111. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2009.01.035
35. 2O nanofluids. Thermochim Acta 483(1-2):73-77. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2008.11.006
36. Yetilmezsoy K, Demirel S, Vanderbei RJ (2009) Response surface modeling of Pb(II) removal from aqueous solution by Pistacia vera L.: Box-Behnken experimental design. J Hazard Mater 171(1-3):551-562. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat. 2009.06.035
37. Yu W, France DM, Routbort JL, Choi SUS (2008) Review and comparison of nanofluid thermal conductivity and heat transfer enhancements. Heat Transfer Eng 29(5):432-460. doi: 10.1080/01457630701850851 (Pubitemid 351287612)