Secular trends in trial of labor and associated neonatal mortality and morbidity in the United States, 1995 to 2002

Journal of Central South University (Medical Sciences)

Volumn 37, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1088-1096

  Wen, Shiwu ^a,b,c   Guo, Yanfang ^a,b   Xie, Rihua ^a,b,d   Dy, Jessica ^a   Walker, Mark ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d HUAIHUA MEDICAL COLLEGE   (China)

Author keywords

Elective cesarean delivery; Neonatal morbidity; Neonatal mortality; Secular trends; Trial of labor

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT MORTALITY; NEWBORN; NEWBORN HYPOXIA; PREGNANCY; REVIEW; STATISTICS; TRIAL OF LABOR; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ASPHYXIA NEONATORUM; CESAREAN SECTION, REPEAT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; TRIAL OF LABOR; UNITED STATES; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84871562480     PISSN: 16727347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.11.002     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Jain NJ, Kruse LK, Demissie K, et al. Impact of mode of delivery on neonatal complications: trends between 1997 and 2005[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2009, 22(6): 491 -500.
2. Menacker F, Martin JA. BirthStats: rates of cesarean delivery, and unassisted and assisted vaginal delivery, United States, 1996, 2000, and 2006[J]. Birth, 2009, 36(2): 167.
3. Wen SW, Rusen ID, Walker M, et al. Comparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labour and elective caesarean section among women with previous delivery, 1988 to 2000[J]. Am J Obstet Gynaecol, 2004, 191(4): 1263-1269. (Pubitemid 39421582)
4. Landon MB. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery[J]. Clin Perinatol, 2008, 35(3): 491-504.
5. Sur S, Murphy KW, Mackenzie IZ. Delivery after caesarean section: consultant obstetricians' professional advice and personal preferences[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2009, 29 (1) : 212-216.
6. Alberman E, Botting B, Blatchley N, et al. A new hierarchical classification of causes of infant deaths in England and Wales[J]. Arch Dis Child, 1994, 70(5): 403-409. (Pubitemid 24183478)
7. Dattani N, Rowan S. Office for national statistics. Causes of neonatal deaths and stillbirths: a new hierarchical classification in ICD-10. Health Statistics Quarterly. NO 15 Autumn 2002[EB/OL].(201002-20) http: //www.ons.gov.uk/about-statistics/classifications/ international/icd-10/ comparing-trends/information-on-howneonatal-deaths-are-affected.pdf.
8. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern epidemiology[M]. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Raven Publishers, 1998.
9. McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WAJr, et al. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section[J]. N Engl J Med, 1996, 335(10): 689-695.
10. Miller DA, Diaz FG, Paul RH. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a 10 year experience[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1994,84(2): 255-258. (Pubitemid 24234838)
11. Flamm BL, Goings JR, Liu Y, et al. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multicenter study[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1994, 83(6): 927-932. (Pubitemid 24165382)
12. Rosen MG, Dickison JC, Westhoff CL. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1991, 77(3): 465-470.
13. Stone C, Halliday J, Lumlery J, et al. Vaginal births after caesarean (VBAC): a population study[J]. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 2000, 14(4): 340-348.
14. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt V, Easterling TR, et al. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery[J]. N Engl J Med, 2001,345(1): 3-8. (Pubitemid 32640179)
15. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery[J]. N Engl J Med, 2004, 351 (25) : 2581 -2589.
16. Wen SW, Henanderz R, Naylor CD. Pitfalls in nonrandomized outcomes studies. The case of incidental appendectomy with open cholecystectomy[J].JAMA, 1995, 274(21): 1687-1691.
17. Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Can a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean also predict the probability of morbidity related to a trial of labor? [J]. Am J Obstet Gynaecol, 2009, 200(1): 56.el-e6.
18. Tan PC, Subramaniam RN, Omar SZ. Labour and perinatal outcome in women at term with one previous lower-segment caesarean: a review of 1000 consecutive cases[J]. Aust N ZJ Obstet Gynaecol, 2007, 47(1): 31-36. (Pubitemid 46152467)
19. Hall MH, Bewley S. Maternal mortality and mode of delivery[J]. Lancet, 1999, 354(9180): 776.
20. Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, et al. The MFMU cesarean registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery[J]. Am J Obstet Gynaecol, 2005, 193(3 Pt 2): 10161023.
21. Coassolo KM, Stamilio DM, Paré E, et al. Safety and efficacy of vaginal birth after cesarean attempts at or beyond 40 weeks of gestation[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2005,106(4): 700-706. (Pubitemid 41362171)
22. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Number 155 (Replaces guideline Number 147), February 2005[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2005, 89(3): 319-331.
23. Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah ME. Planned cesarean section for term breech delivery[CD]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2000(2): CD000166.
24. Clark SL, Miller DD, Belfort MA, et al. Neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with elective term delivery[J]. Am J Obstet Gynaecol, 2009, 200(2) : 156. e1 -e4.
25. MacDorman MF, Menacker F, Dedercq E. Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes[J]. Clin Perinatol, 2008, 35(2): 293-307. (Pubitemid 351635812)
26. Cahill AG, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO, et al. Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery? [J]. AmJ Obstet Gynaecol, 2006, 195(4): 1143-1147. (Pubitemid 44415668)
27. Rossi AC, D'Addario V. Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with meta-analysis[J]. Am J Obstet Gynaecol, 2008, 199(3): 224-231.
28. Huston P, Naylor CD. Health services research: reporting on studies using secondary data sources[J]. CMAJ, 1996, 155(12): 1697-1702. (Pubitemid 27022835)