Labour and perinatal outcome in women at term with one previous lower-segment Caesarean: A review of 1000 consecutive cases

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 31-36

  Tan, Peng Chiong ^a   Subramaniam, Revathy Nadesan ^a   Omar, Siti Zawiah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Blood transfusion; Caesarean section; Hospital stay; Neonatal admission; Trial of labour; Vaginal birth after Caesarean

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; PERINATAL DEATH; PERINATAL PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRIAL OF LABOR; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALAYSIA; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE; TRIAL OF LABOR; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 33846473137     PISSN: 00048666     EISSN: 1479828X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2006.00675.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Munson ML. Births: Final data for 2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2005; 54: 1-116.
2. Yeh J, Wactawski-Wende J, Shelton JA, Reschke J. Temporal trends in the rates of trial of labor in low-risk pregnancies and their impact on the rates and success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 144.
3. Chauhan SP, Martin JN Jr, Henrichs CE, Morrison JC, Magann EF. Maternal and perinatal complications with uterine rupture in 142.0 75 patients who attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 408-417.
4. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2581-2589.
5. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin #54: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 203-212.
6. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Number 155 (Replaces guideline Number 147), February 2005. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005; 89: 319-331.
7. Durnwald C, Mercer B. Vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery: Predicting success, risks of failure. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004; 15: 388-393.
8. Blackwell SC, Hassan SS, Wolfe HM, Michaelson J, Berry SM, Sorokin Y. Vaginal birth after cesarean in the diabetic gravida. J Reprod Med 2000; 45: 987-990.
9. Eriksen NL, Buttino L Jr. Vaginal birth after cesarean: A comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity to elective repeat cesarean section. Am J Perinatol 1989; 6: 375-379.
10. Turner MJ, Agnew G, Langan H. Uterine rupture and labour after a previous low transverse caesarean section. BJOG 2006; 113: 729-732.
11. McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA Jr, Olshan AF. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 689-695.
12. Smith GC, Pell JP, Pasupathy D, Dobbie R. Factors predisposing to perinatal death related to uterine rupture during attempted vaginal birth after caesarean section: Retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2004; 329: 375.
13. Ghaffari Z, Bener A, Ahmed B. Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006; 92: 38-42.
14. Macones GA, Peipert J, Nelson DB et al. Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1656-1662.
15. Mozurkewich EL, Hutton EK. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 1187-1197.
16. Ghidini A, Spong CY. Severe meconium aspiration syndrome is not caused by aspiration of meconium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 931-938.
17. Smith GC, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy. Lancet 2003; 362: 1779-1784.