Lactic Acid Bacteria Convert Human Fibroblasts to Multipotent Cells

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 12, 2012, Pages

  Ohta, Kunimasa ^a   Kawano, Rie ^a   Ito, Naofumi ^a  

^a KUMAMOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG;

ADULT; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL METABOLISM; CELL AGING; CELL CULTURE; CELL DEATH; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL DIVISION; CELL REGENERATION; CELL THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECTODERM; EMBRYO; EMBRYOID BODY; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; ENDODERM; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; HOX GENE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; LACTIC ACID BACTERIUM; LACTOBACILLUS; LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS; LACTOBACILLUS DELBRUECKII; MESODERM; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MOUSE; MULTIPOTENT STEM CELL; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; SKIN FIBROBLAST; STREPTOCOCCUS THERMOPHILUS;

ADULT; ANIMALS; APOPTOSIS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BLOTTING, WESTERN; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; DERMIS; FEMALE; FIBROBLASTS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMANS; IMMUNOENZYME TECHNIQUES; LACTIC ACID; LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS; MALE; MICE; MULTIPOTENT STEM CELLS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA, MESSENGER;

EUKARYOTA; POSIBACTERIA; PROKARYOTA;

EID: 84871557894     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051866     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML, (1990) Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 87: 4576-4579.
2. Margulis L, (1970) Recombination of non-chromosomal genes in Chlamydomonas: assortment of mitochondria and chloroplasts? J Theor Biol 26: 337-342.
3. Metchnikoff I (1907) The prolongation of life, Springer Pub. Co., New York.
4. Mennigen R, Bruewer M, (2009) Effect of probiotics on intestinal barrier function. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1165: 183-189.
5. Isberg RR, Barnes P, (2002) Dancing with the host; flow-dependent bacterial adhesion. Cell 110: 1-4.
6. Forstner JF, Fostner GG (1994) Gastrointestinal mucus., In: Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract (3rd ed.) edited by Johnson LR, Raven, New York: 1255-1284.
7. Allen A, Flemstrom L, Garner A, Kivilaakso E, (1993) Gastroduodenal mucosal protection. Physiol Rev 73: 823-857.
8. Hooper LV, Wong MH, Thelin A, Hansson L, Falk PG, et al. (2001) Molecular analysis of commensal host-microbial relationships in the intestine,. Science 291: 881-884.
9. Hooper LV, Gordon JI, (2001) Commensal host-bacterial relationships in the gut. Science 292: 1115-1118.
10. Kuroda Y, Kitada M, Wakao S, Nishikawa K, Tanimura Y, et al. (2010) Unique multipotent cells in adult human mesenchymal cell populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 8639-8643.
11. Wakao S, Kitada M, Kuroda Y, Shigemoto T, Matsuse D, et al. (2011) Multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring (Muse) cells are a primary source of induced pluripotent stem cells in human fibroblasts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 9875-9880.
12. Loh YH, Wu Q, Chew JL, Vega VB, Zhang W, et al. (2006) The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature genetics 38: 431-440.
13. Boyer LA, Lee TI, Cole MF, Johnstone SE, Levine SS, et al. (2005) Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 122: 947-956.
14. Silva J, Nichols J, Theunissen TW, Guo G, van Oosten AL, et al. (2009) Nanog is the gateway to the pluripotent ground state. Cell 138: 722-737.
15. Allen A, Pearson JP (2000) The gastrointestinal adherent mucus gel barrier. In: Glycoprotein Methods and Protocols. The Mucins, edited by Corfield AP Totawa, NJ: Humana, p57-64.
16. Madsen K, Cornish A, Soper P, McKaigney C, Jijon H, et al. (2001) Probiotic bacteria enhance murine and human intestinal epithelial barrier function. Gastroenterology 121: 580-591.
17. Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, et al. (2007) Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 318: 1917-1920.
18. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, et al. (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131: 861-872.
19. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S, (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126: 663-676.
20. Mitsui K, Tokuzawa Y, Itoh H, Segawa K, Murakami M, et al. (2003) The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell 113: 631-642.
21. Yamaguchi S, Kimura H, Tada M, Nakatsuji N, Tada T, (2005) Nanog expression in mouse germ cell development. Gene Expr Patterns 5: 639-646.
22. McGinnis W, Krumlauf R, (1992) Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68: 283-302.
23. Meijerink J, Mandigers C, van de Locht L, Tonnissen E, Goodsaid F, et al. (2001) A novel method to compensate for different amplification efficiencies between patient DNA samples in quantitative real-time PCR. J Mol Diagn 3: 55-61.