The electrical activities of the uterus during pregnancy

Reproductive Sciences

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 182-189

  Lammers, Wim J E P ^a  

^a UNITED ARAB EMIRATES UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

Author keywords

contraction; electrophysiology; pregnant uterus

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL WALL; ANISOTROPY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEPOLARIZATION; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; GAP JUNCTION; HUMAN; LARGE INTESTINE; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; REVIEW; SMOOTH MUSCLE FIBER; UTERINE ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; UTERUS CONTRACTION; UTERUS FUNCTION;

ANIMALS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; UTERINE CONTRACTION; UTERUS;

EID: 84871555880     PISSN: 19337191     EISSN: 19337205     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1933719112446082     Document Type: Review

References (95)

1. Mines GR. On circulating excitation on heart muscles and their possible relation to tachycardia and fibrillation. Trans R Soc Can. 1914 ; 4: 43-53
2. Bassingthwaighte J, Hunter P, Noble D. The cardiac physiome; perspectives for the future. Exp Physiol. 2009 ; 94 (5). 597-605
3. Schotten U, Verheule S, Kirchhof P, Goette A. Pathophysiological mechanisms of atrial fibrillation: a translational appraisal. Physiol Rev. 2011 ; 91 (1). 265-325
4. Shenasa M, Hindricks G, Borggrefe M, Breithardt G Cardiac Mapping. 3 rd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. Wiley-Blackwell ; 2009 :
5. Lammers WJEP, Ver Donck L, Stephen B, Smets D, Schuurkes JAJ. Origin and propagation of the slow wave in the canine stomach: outline of the gastric conduction system. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009 ; 296 ((6)). G1200 - G1210
6. O'Grady G, Du P, Cheng LK, et al. The origin and propagation of human gastric slow wave activity defined by high resolution mapping. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010 ; 299 ((3)). G585 - G592
7. Lammers WJEP, Ver Donck L, Stephen B, Smets D, Schuurkes JAJ. Focal activities and re-entrant propagations as mechanisms of gastric tachyarrhythmias. Gastroenterology. 2008 ; 135 (5). 1601-1611
8. Lammers WJ, Stephen BS, Karam SM. Functional reentry and circus movement arrhythmia in the small intestine of the normal and diabetic rat. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012 ; 302 (7). G684 - G689
9. Bozler E. Physiological evidence for the syncytial character of smooth muscle. Science. 1937 ; 86 (2238). 476
10. Csapo AI. Smooth muscle as a contractile unit. Physiol Rev. 1962 ; 42 (suppl 5). 7-33
11. Kao CY. Long-term observations of spontaneous electrical activity of the uterine smooth muscle. Am J Physiol. 1959 ; 196 (2). 343-350
12. Merkatz IR. Preface. Am J Perinatol. 1989 ; 6 (2). 103-104
13. Marshall JM. Regulation of activity in uterine smooth muscle. Physiol Rev. 1962 ; 42 (5). 213-227
14. Lammers WJEP, Arafat K, El-Kays A, El-Sharkawy TY. Spatial and temporal variations in local spike propagation in the myometrium of the 17-day pregnant rat. Am J Physiol. 1994 ; 267 (5 Pt 1). C1210 - C1223
15. Eswaran H, Govindan RB, Furdea A, Murphy P, Lowery CL, Preissl HT. Extraction, quantification and characterization of uterine magnetomyographic activity-a proof of concept case study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 ; 144 (suppl 1). S96 - S100
16. Rabotti C, Mischi M, Oei SG, Bergmans JW. Noninvasive estimation of the electrohysterographic action-potential conduction velocity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010 ; 57 (9). 2178-2187
17. Marshall JM. Effects of oestrogen and progesterone on single uterine muscle fibres in the rat. Am J Physiol. 1959 ; 197: 935-942
18. Anderson NC. Physiological basis of myometrial function. Semin Perinatol. 1978 ; 2 (3). 211-222
19. Fuchs AR, Poblete VJ. Oxytocin and uterine function in pregnant and parturient rats. Biol Reprod. 1970 ; 2 (3). 387-400
20. Lodge S, Sproat JE. Resting membrane potentials of pacemaker and non pacemaker areas in rat uterus. Life Sci. 1981 ; 28 (20). 2251-2256
21. Parkington HC, Harding R, Sigger JN. Co-ordination of electrical activity in the myometrium of pregnant ewes. J Reprod Fert. 1988 ; 82 (2). 697-705
22. Caldeyro-Barcia R, Alvarez H, Reynolds SRM. A better understanding of uterine contractility through simultaneous recording with an internal and seven channel external method. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1950 ; 91 (6). 641-650
23. Fuchs AR. Uterine activity in late pregnancy and during parturition in the rat. Biol Reprod. 1969 ; 1 (4). 344-353
24. Crane LH, Martin L. In vivo myometrial activity during early pregnancy and pseudo-pregnancy in the rat. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1991 ; 3 (3). 233-244
25. Wolfs G, Rottinghuis H. Electrical and mechanical activity of the human uterus during labour. Arch Gynak. 1970 ; 208 (4). 373-385
26. Wolfs G, van Leeuwen M, Rottinghuis H, Boeles JThF. An electromyographic study of the human uterus during labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1971 ; 37 (2). 241-246
27. Duquette RA, Shmygol A, Vaillant C, et al. Vimentin-positive, c-KIT negative interstitial cells in human and rat uterus: a role in pacemaking?. Biol Reprod. 2005 ; 72 (2). 276-283
28. Hanani M, Brading AF. Electrical coupling in smooth muscles. Is it universal?. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharm. 2000 ; 11 (4). 321-330
29. Kelly KA, Code CF. Canine gastric pacemaker. Am J Physiol. 1971 ; 220 (1). 112-118
30. Wray S, Kupittayanant S, Shmygol A, Smith RD, Burdyga T. The physiological basis of uterine contractility: a short review. Uterine Contractility Symposium. Exp Physiol. 2001 ; 86 (2). 239-246
31. Buhimshi C. Spatiotemporal electromyography during human labor to monitor propagation of the uterine contraction wave and diagnose dystocia. Am J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2009 ; 200 (1). 1-3
32. Miller SM, Garfield RE, Daniel EE. Improved propagation in myometrium associated with gap junctions during parturition. Am J Physiol. 1989 ; 256 (1 Pt 1). C130 - C141
33. Garfield RE, D Merret, AK Grover. Gap junction formation and regulation in myometrium. Am J Physiol. 1980 ; 239 (5). C217 - C228
34. Garfield RE, Blennerhasset MG, Miller SM. Control of myometrial contractility: role and regulation of gap junctions. Oxf Rev Reprod Biol. 1988 ; 10: 436-490
35. Garfield RE, Hertzberg EL Frontiers in Smooth Muscle Research. Sperelakis N Wood JD, ed. 1990: 673-681.
36. Sims SM, Daniel EE, Garfield RE. Improved electrical coupling in uterine smooth muscle is associated with increased numbers of gap junctions at parturition. J Gen Physiol. 1982 ; 80 (3). 353-375
37. Parkington HC. Some properties of the circular myometrium of the sheep throughout pregnancy and during labour. J Physiol. 1985 ; 359: 1-15
38. Sanborn BM. Ion channels and the control of myometrial electrical activity. Semin Perinatol. 1995 ; 19 (1). 31-40
39. Lammers WJEP, Stephen B. Origin and propagation of individual slow waves along the intact feline small intestine. Exp Physiol. 2008 ; 93 (3). 334-346
40. Specht PC. Phase-plane analysis of action potentials in uterine smooth muscle. Pflugers Arch. 1976 ; 367 (1). 89-95
41. Popescu LM, Vidulescu C, Curici A, et al. Imatinib inhibits spontaneous rhythmic contractions of human uterus and intestine. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006 ; 546 (1-3). 177-181
42. Popescu LM, Ciontea SM, Cretoiu D. Interstitial Cajal-like cells in human uterus and fallopian tube. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2007 ; 1101: 139-165
43. Allix S, Reyes-Gomez E, Aubin-Houzelstein G, et al. Uterine contractions depend on KIT-positive interstitial cells in the mouse: genetic and pharmacological evidence. Biol Reprod. 2008 ; 79 (3). 510-517
44. Huizinga JD, Thuneberg L, Kluppel M, Malysz J, Mikkelsen HB, Bernstein A. W/kit gene required for interstitial cells of Cajal and for intestinal pacemaker activity. Nature. 1995 ; 373 (6512). 347-349
45. Sanders KM. A case for interstitial cells of Cajal as pacemakers and mediators of neurotransmission in the gastrointestinal tract. Gastroenterology. 1996 ; 111 (2). 492-515
46. Ordög T, Takayama I, Cheung WKT, Ward SM, Sanders KM. Remodeling of networks of interstitial cells of Cajal in a murine model of diabetic gastroparesis. Diabetes. 2000 ; 49 (10). 1731-1739
47. Lee HT, Hennig GW, Fleming NW, et al. The mechanism and spread of pacemaker activity through myenteric interstitial cells of cajal in human small intestine. Gastroenterology. 2007 ; 132 (5). 1852-1865
48. Hutchings G, Williams O, Cretoiu D, Ciontea S. Myometrial interstitial cells and the coordination of myometrial contractility. J Cell Mol Med. 2009 ; 13: 4268-4282
49. Lammers WJEP. Circular excitations and reentry in the pregnant uterus. Pflügers Arch (Eur J Physiol). 1997 ; 433 (3). 287-293
50. Lammers WJEP, Hamid R. The initiation, continuation and termination of episodes of circus movements in the pregnant myometrium of the rat. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 ; 179 (6 Pt 1). 1515-1526
51. Lammers WJEP, Mirghani H, Stephen B, et al. Patterns of electrical propagation in the intact pregnant guinea-pig uterus. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2008 ; 294 (3). R919 - R928
52. Coleman HA, Parkington HC. Propagation of electrical and mechanical activity in uterine smooth muscle: a functional role for stretch-sensitive channels. Jpn J Pharmacol. 1992 ; 58 (suppl 2). 369
53. Csapo A, Lloyd-Jacob M. Effect of uterine volume on parturition. Am J Obst Gynecol. 1963 ; 85: 806-812
54. Csapo A, Takeda H, Wood C. Volume and activity of the parturient rabbit uterus. Am J Obst Gynecol. 1963 ; 85: 813-818
55. Csapo A, Jaffin H, Kerenyi T, Lipman J, Wood C. Volume and activity of the pregnant human uterus. Am J Obst Gynecol. 1963 ; 85: 819-835
56. Csapo A. The diagnostic significance of the intrauterine pressure. Part I. Obstetr Gynecol Survey. 1970 ; 25 (5). 403-435
57. Csapo A. The diagnostic significance of the intrauterine pressure. Part II. Obstetr Gynecol Survey. 1970 ; 25 (6). 515-543
58. Takeda H. Generation and propagation of uterine activity in situ. Fertil Steril. 1965 ; 16: 113-119
59. Young RC, Goloman G. Mechanotransduction in rat myometrium: coordination of contractions of electrically and chemically isolated tissues. Reprod Sci. 2011 ; 18 (1). 64-69
60. Aslanidi O, Atia J, Benson AP, et al. Towards a computational reconstruction of the electrodynamics of premature and full term human labour. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2011 ; 107 (1). 183-192
61. Bode O. Das Elektrohysterogramm. Arch Gyn Obst. 1931 ; 146: 123-128
62. Clason S. Versuche mit obstetrischer Elektrographie. Acta Obst et Gynec Scandinav. 1934 ; 14: 131-142
63. Dill LV, Maiden RM. The electrical potentials of the human uterus in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1946 ; 52 (5). 735-745
64. Dill LV, Maiden RM. Further studies on the electrical potentials of the human uterus in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1948 ; 56 (2). 213-225
65. Steer CM, Hertsch GJ. Electrical activity of the human uterus in labor. The electrohysterograph. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1950 ; 59 (1). 25-40
66. Mansour S, Duchene J, Germain G, Marque C., Uterine EMG. Experimental and mathematical determination of the relationship between internal and external recordings. IEEE EMBS. 1991 ; 13: 485-486
67. Hon EHG, Davis CD. Cutaneous and uterine electrical potentials in labor-an experiment. Obstet Gynecol. 1958 ; 12 (1). 47-53
68. Devedeux D, Marque C, Mansour S, Germain G, Duchene J. Uterine electromyography; a critical review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 ; 169 (6). 1636-1653
69. Buhimshi C, Garfield RE. Uterine contractility as assessed by abdominal surface recording of electromyographic activity in rats during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 ; 174 (2). 744-753
70. Buhimshi C, Garfield RE. Uterine activity during pregnancy and labor assessed by simultaneous recordings from the myometrium and abdominal surface in the rat. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 ; 178 (4). 811-822
71. Buhimshi C, Boyle MB, Garfield RE. Electrical activity of the human uterus during pregnancy as recorded from the abdominal surface. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 ; 90 (1). 102-111
72. Maner WL, Garfield RE, Maul H, Olson G, Saade G. Predicting term and preterm delivery with transabdominal uterine electromyography. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 ; 101 (6). 1254-1260
73. Most O, Langer O, Kerner R, David GB. Calderon I. Can myometrial electrical activity identify patients in preterm labor?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 ; 199 (4). e1 e6-378 378
74. Schlembach D, Maner WL, Garfield RE, Maul H. Monitoring the progress of pregnancy and labor using electromyography. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 ; 144 (suppl 1). S33 - S39
75. Jacod BC, Graatsma EM, Van Hagen E, Visser GH. A validation of electrohysterography for uterine activity monitoring during labour. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 ; 23 (1). 17-22
76. Lucovnik M, Kuon RJ, Chambliss LR, et al. Use of uterine electromyography to diagnose term and preterm labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 ; 90 (2). 150-157
77. Lucovnik M, Maner WL, Chambliss LR, et al. Noninvasiv uterine electromyography for prediction of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 ; 204 (3). e1 - e10
78. Jiang W, Li G, Lin L. Uterine electromyogram topography to represent synchronization of uterine contractions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 ; 97 (2). 120-124
79. Euliano TY, Marossero D, Nguyen MT, Euliano NR, Principe J, Edwards RK. Spatiotemporal electrohysterography patterns in normal and arrested labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 ; 200 (1). e1 - e7
80. Rabotti C, Oei SG, van't Hooft J, Mischi M. Electrohysterographic propagation velocity for preterm delivery prediction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 ; 205 (6). e9 - e10
81. Eswaran H, Preissl H, Wilson JD, Murphy P, Lowery CL. Prediction of labor in term and preterm pregnancies using non-invasive magnetomyographic recordings of uterine contractions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 ; 190 (6). 1598-1603
82. Irimia A, Richards WO, Bradshaw LA. Magnetogastrographic detection of gastric electrical response activity in humans. Phys Med Biol. 2006 ; 51 (5). 1347-1360
83. Ramon C, Preissl H, Murphy P, Wilson JD, Lowery C, Eswaran H. Synchronization analysis of the uterine magnetic activity during contractions. Biomed Eng Online. 2005 ; 4: 55
84. Lowery CL, Govindan RB, Preissl H, Murphy P, Eswaran H. Fetal neurological assessment using noninvasive magnetoencephalography. Clin Perinatol. 2009 ; 36 (3). 701-709
85. Eswaran H, Govindan RB, Haddad NI, et al. Spectral power differences in the brain activity of growth-restricted and normal fetuses [published online ahead of print October 5, 2011]. Early Hum Dev. 2011 ;:
86. Andersen HF, Barclay ML. A computer model of uterine contractions based on discrete contractile elements. Obstet Gynecol. 1995 ; 86 (1). 108-111
87. Young RC. A computer model of uterine contractions based on action potential propagation and intercellular calcium waves. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 ; 89 (4). 604-608
88. Rihana S, Lefrancois E, Marque C. A two dimension model of the uterine electrical wave propagation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007 ; 2007: 1109-1112
89. Rihana S, Terrien J, Germain G, Marque C. Mathematical modeling of electrical activity of uterine muscle cells. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009 ; 47 (6). 665-675
90. Taggart MJ, Blanks A, Kharche S, Holden A, Wang B, Zhang H. Towards understanding the myometrial physiome: approaches for the construction of a virtual physiological uterus. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007 ; 7 (suppl 1). S3
91. Tong WC, Choi CY, Karche S, Holden AV, Zhang H, Taggart MJ. A. computational model of the ionic currents, Ca2+ dynamics and action potentials underlying contraction of isolated uterine smooth muscle. PLoS One. 2011 ; 6 (4). e18685
92. Parkington HC, Coleman HA The Endocrinology of Parturition, Basic Science and Clinical Application. Smith R, ed. Basel, Karger: Front Horm Res ; 2001: 179-200.
93. Mitchell BF, Taggart MJ. Are animal models relevant to key aspects of human parturition?. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2009 ; 297 (3). R525 - R545
94. Smith R. Parturition. N Engl J Med. 2007 ; 356 (3). 271-283
95. Osa T, Katase T. Physiological comparison of the longitudinal and circular muscles of the pregnant rat uterus. Jpn J Physiol. 1975 ; 25 (2). 153-164