Clustering and classification of regional peak plantar pressures of diabetic feet

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 19-25

  Bennetts, Craig J ^a   Owings, Tammy M ^a   Erdemir, Ahmet ^a   Botek, Georgeanne ^a   Cavanagh, Peter R ^b  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Classification; Diabetes; Foot; K means clustering; Plantar pressure; Ulcer

Indexed keywords

DIABETIC FOOT; DIABETIC FOOT ULCER; DIABETIC PATIENT; ELEVATED PRESSURE; FOCAL AREA; FOOT; FOOT ULCERATION; IDENTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS; K-MEANS CLUSTERING; NUMBER OF CLUSTERS; PEAK PRESSURE; PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY; PLANTAR PRESSURES; POTENTIAL RISKS; ULCER;

BIOMECHANICS; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DERMATOLOGY; DISEASES; MEDICAL PROBLEMS;

PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION;

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETIC FOOT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRESCRIPTION; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGIONAL PEAK PLANTAR PRESSURE; SHOE;

AGED; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC FOOT; FEMALE; FOOT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE; SHOES;

EID: 84871453027     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abbott C.A., Garrow A.P., Carrington A.L., Morris J., Van Ross E.R., Boulton A.J. Foot ulcer risk is lower in South-Asian and African-Caribbean compared with European diabetic patients in the U.K.: the North-West diabetes foot care study. Diabetes Care 2005, 28(8):1869-1875.
2. Acharya R., Tan P.H., Subramaniam T., Tamura T., Chua K.C., Goh S.C., Lim C.M., Goh S.Y., Chung K.R., Law C. Automated identification of diabetic type 2 subjects with and without neuropathy using wavelet transform on pedobarograph. Journal of Medical Systems 2008, 32(1):21-29.
3. Acharya U.R., Tong J., Subbhuraam V.S., Chua C.K., Ha T.P., Ghista D.N., Chattopadhyay S., Ng K.H., Suri J.S. Computer-based identification of type 2 diabetic subjects with and without neuropathy using dynamic planter pressure and principal component analysis. Journal of Medical Systems 2011, 36(4):2483-2491.
4. Bennett P.J., Duplock L.R. Pressure distribution beneath the human foot. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 1993, 83(12):674-678.
5. Bus S.A., Arts M.L.J., Waaijman R., de Haart M., Busch-Westbroek T., van Baal S.G., Nollet F. The effectiveness of using in-shoe plantar pressure assessment and monitoring in prescription therapeutic footwear to prevent plantar foot ulcer recurrence in diabetic patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2012, 5(1 Suppl):O11.
6. Bus S.A., de Lange A. A comparison of the 1-step, 2-step, and 3-step protocols for obtaining barefoot plantar pressure data in the diabetic neuropathic foot. Clinical Biomechechanics (Bristol, Avon) 2005, 20(9):892-899.
7. Cavanagh P.R., Bus S.A. Off-loading the diabetic foot for ulcer prevention and healing. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Official Publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery 2010, 52(3 Suppl):37S-43S.
8. Cavanagh P.R., Owings T.M. Nonsurgical strategies for healing and preventing recurrence of diabetic foot ulcers. Foot and Ankle Clinics 2006, 11(4):735-743.
9. Cavanagh P.R., Rodgers M.M., Iiboshi A. Pressure distribution under symptom-free feet during barefoot standing. Foot & Ankle 1987, 7(5):262-276.
10. Cristianini N., Shawe-Taylor J. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 1st edition.
11. De Cock A., Willems T., Witvrouw E., Vanrenterghem J., De Clercq D. A functional foot type classification with cluster analysis based on plantar pressure distribution during jogging. Gait & Posture 2006, 23(3):339-347.
12. Duda R.O., Hart P.E., Stork D.G. Pattern Classification 2000, Wiley-Interscience. 2nd edition.
13. Giacomozzi C., Martelli F., Nagel A., Schmiegel A., Rosenbaum D. Cluster analysis to classify gait alterations in rheumatoid arthritis using peak pressure curves. Gait & Posture 2009, 29(2):220-224.
14. Jaksa P.J., Mahoney J.L. Quality of life in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: validation of the Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule in a Canadian population. International Wound Journal 2010, 7(6):502-507.
15. Lavery L.A., Armstrong D.G., Wunderlich R.P., Tredwell J., Boulton A.J.M. Predictive value of foot pressure assessment as part of a population-based diabetes disease management program. Diabetes Care 2003, 26(4):1069-1073.
16. Ledoux W.R., Shofer J.B., Ahroni J.H., Smith D.G., Sangeorzan B.J., Boyko E.J. Biomechanical differences among pes cavus, neutrally aligned, and pes planus feet in subjects with diabetes. Foot & Ankle International/American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society [and] Swiss Foot and Ankle Society 2003, 24(11):845-850.
17. Melai T., Ijzerman T.H., Schaper N.C., de Lange T.L., Willems P.J., Meijer K., Lieverse A.G., Savelberg H.H. Calculation of plantar pressure time integral, an alternative approach. Gait & Posture 2011, 34(3):379-383.
18. Mueller M.J. Application of plantar pressure assessment in footwear and insert design. Journal of Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy 1999, 29(12):747-755.
19. Pataky T.C., Caravaggi P., Savage R., Crompton R.H. Regional peak plantar pressures are highly sensitive to region boundary definitions. Journal of Biomechanics 2008, 41(12):2772-2775.
20. Pataky T.C., Goulermas J.Y. Pedobarographic statistical parametric mapping (pSPM): a pixel-level approach to foot pressure image analysis. Journal of Biomechanics 2008, 41(10):2136-2143.
21. Pinzur M.S. Current concepts review: Charcot arthropathy of the foot and ankle. Foot & Ankle International/American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society [and] Swiss Foot and Ankle Society 2007, 28(8):952-959.
22. Putti A.B., Arnold G.P., Cochrane L.A., Abboud R.J. Normal pressure values and repeatability of the Emed ST4 system. Gait & Posture 2008, 27(3):501-505.
23. Sawacha Z., Guarneri G., Avogaro A., Cobelli C. A new classification of diabetic gait pattern based on cluster analysis of biomechanical data. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technololgy 2010, 4(5):1127-1138.
24. Schmiegel A., Vieth V., Gaubitz M., Rosenbaum D. Pedography and radiographic imaging for the detection of foot deformities in rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 2008, 23(5):648-652.
25. See, C.K., Acharya, U.R., Zhu, K., Lim, T.C., Yu, W.W., Subramaniam, T., Law, C., 2010. Automated identification of diabetes type-2 subjects with and without neuropathy using eigenvalues. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H. Journal of Engineering in Medicine 224 (1), 43-52.
26. Singh N., Armstrong D.G., Lipsky B.A. Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Journal of the American Medical Association 2005, 293(2):217-228.
27. Van Gheluwe B., Dananberg H.J., Hagman F., Vanstaen K. Effects of hallux limitus on plantar foot pressure and foot kinematics during walking. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 2006, 96(5):428-436.
28. Vardaxis V.G., Allard P., Lachance R., Duhaime M. Classification of able-bodied gait using 3-D muscle powers. Human Movement Science 1998, 17(1):121-136.
29. Waaijman R., Bus S.A. The interdependency of peak pressure and pressure-time integral in pressure studies on diabetic footwear: no need to report both parameters. Gait & Posture 2012, 35(1):1-5.
30. Waldecker U. Pedographic classification and ulcer detection in the diabetic foot. Foot and Ankle Surgery: Official Journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons 2012, 18(1):42-49.
31. Watelain E., Barbier F., Allard P., Thevenon A., Angué J.C. Gait pattern classification of healthy elderly men based on biomechanical data. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000, 81(5):579-586.
32. White S.G., McNair P.J. Abdominal and erector spinae muscle activity during gait: the use of cluster analysis to identify patterns of activity. Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 2002, 17(3):177-184.
33. Wild S., Roglic G., Green A., Sicree R., King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004, 27(5):1047-1053.