Comparison between mechanical properties of human saphenous vein and umbilical vein

BioMedical Engineering Online

Volumn 11, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Hamedani, Borhan A ^a   Navidbakhsh, Mahdi ^a   Tafti, Hossein A ^b  

^a IRAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cauchy stress; Fourth order polynomial; Non linear rheological behavior; Saphenous vein; Stretch ratio.; Umbilical vein

Indexed keywords

CAUCHY STRESS; FOURTH ORDER POLYNOMIAL; RHEOLOGICAL BEHAVIORS; SAPHENOUS VEIN; STRETCH RATIO; UMBILICAL VEIN;

BLOOD PRESSURE; BYPASS RATIO; ELASTICITY; STIFFNESS; STRESS-STRAIN CURVES;

BLOOD VESSELS;

RATTUS;

AGED; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; CIRCULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY BLOOD VESSEL; CYTOLOGY; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICS; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; SAPHENOUS VEIN; TRANSPLANTATION; UMBILICAL VEIN;

AGED; BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD CIRCULATION; CORONARY VESSELS; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL PROCESSES; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SAPHENOUS VEIN; TRANSPLANTATION; UMBILICAL VEINS;

EID: 84871433813     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1475925X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-11-59     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. American Heart Association American Stroke Association: heart disease and stroke statistics 2010, American Heart Association.
2. Assoul N, Flaud P, Chaouat M, Letourneur D, Bataille I. Mechanical properties of rat thoracic and abdominal aortas. J. Biomechanics 2008, 41:2227-2236.
3. Sh RG, Haider Z, Ahmad M, Zaman H. Saphenous vein grafts: to use or not to use?. J. Heart Lung and Circulation 2004, 13:150-156.
4. Migliavacca F, Dubini G. Computational modeling of vascular anastomosis. J. Biomechan Model Mechanobiol 2005, 3:235-250.
5. Alderson H, Zamir M. Smaller, stiffer coronary bypass can moderate or reverse the adverse effects of wave reflections. J. Biomechanics 2001, 34:1455-1462.
6. McDonald DA. Blood Flow in Arteries. 1974, Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
7. Milesi V, Rebolledo A, Paredes FA, Sanz N, Tommasi J, Gustavo JR, Grassi AO. Mechanical properties of human saphenous veins from normotensive and hypertensive patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1998, 66:455-461. 10.1016/S0003-4975(98)00465-2, 9725384.
8. Andel CJV, Borst C. Mechanical properties of porcine and human arteries: implications for coronary anastomotic connectors. Ann Thorac Surg 2003, 76:58-65. 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)00263-7, 12842513.
9. Donovan DL, Schmidt SP, Townshend SP, Njus GO, Sharp WV. Material and structural characterization of human Saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg 1990, 12:531-537.
10. Miyamotto M, Del Valle CE, Moreira RCR, Timi JRR. Comparative analysis of rupture resistance between glutaraldehyde-treated bovine pericardium and great Saphenous vein. J. vasc. bras 2009, 8:723-732.
11. Matthews PB, Azadani AN, Jhun CS, Ge L, Guy TS, Guccione JM, Tseng EE. Comparison of porcine pulmonary and aortic root material properties. Ann Thorac Surg 2010, 89:1981-1989. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.002, 20494060.
12. Stephanis CG, Mourmouras DE, Tsagadopoulos DG. On the elastic properties of arteries. J Biomech 2003, 36:1727-1731. 10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00188-X, 14522215.
13. Rossmann JS. Elastomechanical properties of bovine veins. J. the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 2010, 3:210-215.
14. Balazs T, Bognar E, Zima E, Dobranszky J. Mechanical Properties of Coronary Veins 2008, n7. Mechanical Engineering: Ge-peszet Proceedings of Sixth Conference on.
15. Teng Z, Tang D, Zheng J, Woodard PK, Hoffman AH. An experimental study on the ultimate strength of the adventitia and media of human atherosclerotic carotid arteries in circumferential and axial directions. J. Biomechanics 2009, 42:2535-2539.
16. Holzapfel GA, Sommer G, Gasser CT, Regitnig P. Determination of layer-specific mechanical properties of human coronary arteries with nonatherosclerotic intimal thickening and related constitutive modeling. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2005, 289:2048-2058.
17. Cacho F, Doblare M, Holzapfel GA. A procedure to simulate coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Med Bio Eng Comput 2007, 45:819-827.
18. Fung YC. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues 1981, New York: Springer-Verlag.
19. Moore KL, Dalley AF. Clinically Oriented Anatomy 1999, Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 4.
20. Ch LW, Zhang HM, Wang PJ, Xi GM, Wang HQ, Chen Y, Deng Zh H, Zhang Zh H, Zh HT. Quantitative analysis of the microstructure of human umbilical vein for assessing feasibility as vessel substitute. Ann Vasc Surg 2008, 22:417-424. 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.12.021, 18466819.
21. Neufang A, Espinola-Klein C, Dorweiler B, Martina Messow C, Schmiedt W, Friedrich Vahl C. Femoropopliteal prosthetic bypass with glutaraldehyde stabilized human umbilical vein (HUV). J Vascular Surgery 2007, 46:280-288.
22. Gebrane Younes J, Minh HN, Orcel L. Ultrastructure of human umbilical vessels: a possible role in amniotic fluid formation. J Placenta 1986, 7:173-185.
23. Sexton AJ, Turmaine M, Cai WQ, Burnstock GA. Study of the ultrastructure of developing human umbilical vessels. J Anat 1996, 188:75-85. 1167635, 8655418.
24. Mills SE. Histology for Pathologists 2007, Virginia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
25. Svejcar J, Prerovský I, Linhart J, Kruml J. Content of collagen, elastin, and water in walls of the internal saphenous vein in man. J American Heart Association 1962, 11:296-300.
26. Fung JC, Perome N, Anliker M. Biomechanics, Its Foundations and Objectives 1972, San Diego: Prentice-Hall.
27. Lally C, Reid AJ, Prendergast PJ. Elastic behavior of porcine coronary artery tissue under uniaxial and equibiaxial tension. Ann Biomed Eng 2004, 32:1355-1364.