Removal of a laryngeal foreign body under videolaryngoscopy

Resuscitation

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Cheng, Y ^a   Xue, F S ^a   Cui, X L ^a  

^a PLASTIC SURGERY HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORCEPS; FOREIGN BODY; HUMAN; LARYNGOSCOPE; LARYNGOSCOPY; LARYNX; LETTER; MANDIBLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VIDEORECORDING;

FEMALE; FOREIGN BODIES; HUMANS; HYPOPHARYNX; LARYNGOSCOPES; LARYNGOSCOPY; MALE;

EID: 84871416361     PISSN: 03009572     EISSN: 18731570     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.09.038     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. ® versus Macintosh laryngoscope for the removal of a hypopharyngeal foreign body: a randomized cross-over cadaver study. Resuscitation 2012, 83:1277-1280.
2. Xue F., Zhang G., Liu J., et al. A clinical assessment of the Glidescope videolaryngoscope in nasotracheal intubation with general anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 2006, 18:611-615.
3. van Zundert A., Pieters B., van Zundert T., Gatt S. Avoiding palatopharyngeal trauma during videolaryngoscopy: do not forget the 'blind spots'. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012, 56:532-534.
4. Boedeker B.H., Bernhagen M.A., Miller D.J., Doyle D.J. Comparison of the Magill forceps and the Boedeker (curved) intubation forceps for removal of a foreign body in a Manikin. J Clin Anesth 2012, 24:25-27.
5. Xidong C, Xia Z, Chenjie X, Wenhong Y, Huichang Y, Jiaqi J. Management of difficult suspension laryngoscopy using a GlideScope® video laryngoscope. Acta Otolaryngol; doi:10.3109/00016489.2012.703326.