Justice theory

Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 344-361

  Tyler, Tom R ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871392829     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781446249222.n43     Document Type: Chapter

References (63)

1. Barrett-Howard, E. and Tyler, T.R. Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 296-304. (1986) doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.296
2. Bies, R.J. and Moag, J.S. (1986) Interactional justice. In R.J. Lewicki, B.M. Sheppard, and M.H. Bazerman (eds), Research on Negotiations in Organizations, 1, 43-55. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
3. Blader, S.L. What determines people's fairness judgments? Identification and outcomes influence procedural fairness evaluations under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 986-994. (2007) doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.022
4. Blader, S.L. and Tyler, T.R. A four component model of procedural justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 747-758. (2003) doi:10.1177/0146167203029006007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029006007
5. Blader, S.L. and Tyler, T.R. Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology. 94, 445-464. (2009) doi:10.1037/a0013935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013935
6. Brosnan, S.F. Nonhuman species’ reactions to inequity and their implications for fairness. Social Justice Research, 19, 153-185. (2006) doi:10.1007/s11211-006-0002-z http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11211-006-0002-z
7. Chen, E. and Tyler, T.R. (2001) Cloaking power: Legitimizing myths and the psychology of the advantaged. In J.A. Bargh and A.Y. Lee-Chai (eds), The Use and Abuse of Power, pp. 241-261. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
8. Darley, J.M. and Pittman, T.S. The psychology of compensation and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 324-336. (2003) doi:10.1037//0022-3514.78.5.853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.5.853
9. DeCremer, D. and Tyler, T.R. Managing group behavior: The interplay between procedural justice, sense of self, and cooperation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 151-218. (2005) doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37003-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601%2805%2937003-1
10. Deutsch, M. Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice?Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149. (1975) doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb01000.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb01000.x
11. Deutsch, M. (1985) Distributive Justice. New Haven: Yale University PRess.
12. Gold, M. (1999) The Complete Social Scientist: A Kurt Lewin Reader. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13. Gurr, T. (1970) Why Men Rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
14. Handgraaaf, M.J.J., Van Dijk, E., Wilke, H.A.M. and Vermunt, R. Evaluability of outcomes in ultimatum bargaining. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95, 97-106. (2004) doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.06.005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.06.005
15. Hogg, M.A. and Abrams, D. (1988) Social Identifications. London: Routledge.
16. Huo, Y.J. Justice and the regulation of social relations: When and why do group members deny claims to social goods?British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 535-562. (2002) doi:10.1348/014466602321149876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466602321149876
17. Kelley, H.H., Holmes, J.G., Kerr, N.L., Reis, H.T., Rusbult, C.E. and Van Lange, P.A.M. (2003) An Atlas of Interpersonal Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Kelley, H.H. and Thibaut, J.W. (1978) Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence. New York: Wiley.
19. Lerner, M.J. (1980) The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion. New York: Plenum.
20. Leventhal, G.S. (1980) What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, and R. Willis (eds), Social Exchange, pp. 27-55. New York: Plenum. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5_2
21. Levine, R.A. and Campbell, D.T. (1972) Ethnocentrism: Theories of Conflict, Ethnic Attitudes, and Group Behavior. New York: Wiley.
22. Lind, E.A., Kanfer, R. and Earley, C. Voice, control, and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959. (1990) doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.952
23. Lind, E.A. and Tyler, T.R. (1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.
24. Messick, D.M., Bloom, S., Boldizar, J.P. and Samuelson, C.D. Why we are fairer than others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 389-399. (1985) doi:10.1016/0022-1031(85)90031-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031%2885%2990031-9
25. Messick, D. and Sentis, K. Estimating social and nonsocial utility functions from ordinal data. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 389-399. (1985) doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420150403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420150403
26. Mikula, G., Petri, B. and Tanzer, N. What people regard as unjust. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 133-149. (1990) doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420200205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420200205
27. Montada, L. Applying social psychology: The case of redistributions in united Germany. Social Justice Research, 8, 73-90. (1995) doi:10.1007/BF02334827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02334827
28. Nagata, D. (1993) Legacy of Injustice. New York: Plenum.
29. Opotow, S. Animals and the scope of justice. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 71-86. (1993) doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00909.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00909.x
30. Range, F., Horn, L., Viranyi, Z. and Huber, L. The absence of reward induces inequity aversion in dogs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 106, 340-345. (2009) doi:10.1073/pnas.0810957105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810957105
31. Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
32. Ross, M. and Sicoly, F. Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 322-336. (1979) doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.322
33. Rusbult, C. and Van Lange, P. (1996) Interdependence processes. In E.T. Higgins and A.W. Kruglanski (eds), Social Psychology, pp. 564-596. New York: Guilford Press.
34. Rusbult, C.E., Verette, J., Whitney, G.A., Slovik, L.F. and Lipkus, I. Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53-78. (1991) doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.1.53 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.1.53
35. Sedikides, C. and Brewer, M.B. (2001) Individual Self, Relational Self, and Collective Self. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
36. Smith, H.J., Tyler, T.R., Huo, Y.J., Ortiz, D.J. and Lind, E.A. The self-relevant implications of the group-value model: Group membership, self-worth, and procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 470-493. (1998) doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1360
37. Snyder, C.R. and Lopez, S.J. (2002) Handbook of Positive Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Stahl, T., Vermunt, R. and Ellemers, N. For love or money? How activation of relational versus instrumental concerns affects reactions to decision-making procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 80-94. (2008) doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.02.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.02.004
39. Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W.G. Austin and S. Worchel (eds), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, pp. 33-47. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
40. Thibaut, J. and Faucheux, C. The development of contractual norms in a bargaining situation under two types of stress. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 89-102. (1965) doi:10.1016/0022-1031(65)90038-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031%2865%2990038-7
41. Thibaut, J. and Kelley, H.H. (1959) The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Wiley.
42. Thibaut, J. and Walker, L. (1975) Procedural Justice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Thompson, L. and Loewenstein, G. Egocentric interpretations of fairness and interpersonal conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 176-197. (1992) doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90010-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978%2892%2990010-5
44. Tyler, T.R. Conditions leading to value expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 333-344. (1987) doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.333
45. Tyler, T.R. What is procedural justice?: Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law and Society Review, 22, 103-135. (1988) doi:10.2307/3053563 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3053563
46. Tyler, T.R. The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830-838. (1989) doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.830
47. Tyler, T.R. Psychological models of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 850-863. (1994) doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.850
48. Tyler, T.R. Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 201-246. (1999)
49. Tyler, T.R. Social justice: Outcome and procedure. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 117-125. (2000) doi:10.1080/002075900399411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/002075900399411
50. Tyler, T.R. (2006) Why People Obey the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
51. Tyler, T.R. and Bies, R. (1990) Interpersonal aspects of procedural justice. In J.S. Carroll (ed.), Applied Social Psychology in Business Settings, pp. 77-98. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Tyler, T.R. and Blader, S.L. (2000) Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
53. Tyler, T.R. and Blader, S.L. Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349-361. (2003) doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07
54. Tyler, T.R., Boeckmann, R., Smith, H.J. and Huo, Y.J. (1997) Social Justice in a Diverse Society. Denver, CO: Westview.
55. Tyler, T.R. and Caine, A. The role of distributional and procedural fairness in the endorsement of formal leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 642-655. (1981) doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.4.642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.4.642
56. Tyler, T.R., Degoey, P. and Smith, H. Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930. (1996) doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.913
57. Tyler, T.R. and Lind, E.A. A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115-191. (1992) doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60283-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601%2808%2960283-X
58. Tyler, T.R., Rasinski, K. and Spodick, N. The influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 72-81. (1985) doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.72 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.72
59. Tyler, T.R. and Smith, H.J. (1998) Social justice and social movements. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske and G. Lindzey (eds), Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2, 4th Edition, pp. 595-629. New York: McGraw-Hill.
60. Van Lange, P.A.M., De Cremer, D., Van Dijk, E. and Van Vugt, M. (2007) Self-interest and beyond. In A.W. Kruglanski and E.T. Higgins (eds), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, 2nd Edition. New York: Guilford Press.
61. Vidmar, N. and Miller, D.T. The social psychology of punishment. Law and Society Review, 14, 565-602. (1980) doi:10.2307/3053193 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3053193
62. Wakslak, C.J., Jost, J.T., Tyler, T.R. and Chen, E. System justification and the alleviation of emotional distress. Psychological Science, 18, 267-274. (2007) doi:10.1037/h0033967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0033967
63. Walster, E., Walster, G.W. and Berscheid, E. (1978) Equity: Theory and Research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.