Evaluation of resection margins in breast conservation therapy: The pathology perspective-past, present, and future

International Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 2012, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Emmadi, Rajyasree ^a   Wiley, Elizabeth L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871384566     PISSN: 20901402     EISSN: 20901410     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2012/180259     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Fisher B., Anderson S., Bryant J., Margolese R. G., Deutsch M., Fisher E. R., Jeong J. H., Wolmark N., Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2002 347 16 1233 1241 2-s2.0-0037126341 10.1056/NEJMoa022152 (Pubitemid 35176242)
2. Veronesi U., Cascinelli N., Mariani L., Greco M., Saccozzi R., Luini A., Aguilar M., Marubini E., Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2002 347 16 1227 1232 2-s2.0-0037126350 10.1056/NEJMoa020989 (Pubitemid 35176241)
3. Van Dongen J. A., Voogd A. C., Fentiman I. S., Legrand C., Sylvester R. J., Tong D., Van Der Schueren E., Helle P. A., Van Zijl K., Bartelink H., Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European organization for research and treatment of cancer 10801 trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2000 92 14 1143 1150 2-s2.0-0034686622
4. Poortmans P. M., Collette L., Horiot J. C., Van den Bogaert W. F., Fourquet A., Kuten A., Noordijk E. M., Hoogenraad W., Mirimanoff R. O., Pierart M., Van Limbergen E., Bartelink H., Impact of the boost dose of 10 Gy versus 26 Gy in patients with early stage breast cancer after a microscopically incomplete lumpectomy: 10-year results of the randomised EORTC boost trial. Radiotherapy and Oncology 2009 90 1 80 85 2-s2.0-58149265075 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.07.011
5. Schnitt S. J., Connolly J. L., Khettry U., Pathologic findings on re-excision of the primary site in breast cancer patients considered for treatment by primary radiation therapy. Cancer 1987 59 4 675 681 2-s2.0-0023132354 (Pubitemid 17018739)
6. Rodriguez N., Diaz L. K., Wiley E. L., Predictors of residual disease in repeat excisions for lumpectomies with margins less than 0.1 cm. Clinical Breast Cancer 2005 6 2 169 172 2-s2.0-22144490828 (Pubitemid 40975614)
7. Kaur N., Petit J. Y., Rietjens M., Maffini F., Luini A., Gatti G., Rey P. C., Urban C., De Lorenzi F., Comparative study of surgical margins in oncoplastic surgery and quadrantectomy in breast cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2005 12 7 539 545 2-s2.0-21244500229 10.1245/ASO.2005.12.046 (Pubitemid 40898036)
8. Singletary S. E., Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. American Journal of Surgery 2002 184 5 383 393 2-s2.0-0036845433 10.1016/S0002-9610(02)01012-7 (Pubitemid 35335942)
9. Skripenova S., Layfield L. J., Initial margin status for invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast and subsequent identification of carcinoma in reexcision specimens. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine 2010 134 1 109 114 2-s2.0-75149120661
10. Wiley E. L., Diaz L. K., Badve S., Morrow M., Effect of time interval on residual disease in breast cancer. American Journal of Surgical Pathology 2003 27 2 194 198 2-s2.0-0037310979 10.1097/00000478-200302000-00007 (Pubitemid 36152228)
11. Taghian A., Mohiuddin M., Jagsi R., Goldberg S., Ceilley E., Powell S., Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy: results of a survey. Annals of Surgery 2005 241 4 629 639 2-s2.0-15444378062 10.1097/01.sla.0000157272.04803.1b (Pubitemid 40397311)
12. Holland R., Veling S. H. J., Mravunac M., Hendriks J. H. C. L., Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas: implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer 1985 56 5 979 990 2-s2.0-0021883671 (Pubitemid 15003474)
13. Solin L. J., Yeh I. T., Kurtz J., Fourquet A., Recht A., Kuske R., McCormick B., Cross M. A., Schultz D. J., Amalric R., LiVolsi V. A., Kowalyshyn M. J., Torhorst J., Jacquemier J., Westermann C. D., Mazoujian G., Zafrani B., Rosen P. P., Goodman R. L., Fowble B. L., Ductal carcinoma in situ (intraductal carcinoma) of the breast treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive irradiation: correlation of pathologic parameters with outcome of treatment. Cancer 1993 71 8 2532 2542 2-s2.0-0027523682 (Pubitemid 23100488)
14. Chan K. C., Fiona Knox W., Sinha G., Gandhi A., Barr L., Baildam A. D., Bundred N. J., Extent of excision margin width required in breast conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer 2001 91 1 9 16 2-s2.0-0035165230 (Pubitemid 32052608)
15. Dzierzanowski M., Melville K. A., Barnes P. J., MacIntosh R. F., Caines J. S., Porter G. A., Ductal carcinoma in situ in core biopsies containing invasive breast cancer: correlation with extensive intraductal component and lumpectomy margins. Journal of Surgical Oncology 2005 90 2 71 76 2-s2.0-17844386306 10.1002/jso.20242 (Pubitemid 40594104)
16. Ciocca R. M., Li T., Freedman G. M., Morrow M., Presence of lobular carcinoma in situ does not increase local recurrence in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2008 15 8 2263 2271 2-s2.0-48149096719 10.1245/s10434-008-9960-8
17. Sahoo S., Recant W. M., Jaskowiak N., Tong L., Heimann R., Defining negative margins in DCIS patients treated with breast conservation therapy: the University of Chicago experience. Breast Journal 2005 11 4 242 247 2-s2.0-22644434507 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.21617.x (Pubitemid 41026037)
18. Schwartz G. F., Patchefsky A. S., Finklestein S. D., Sohn S. H., Prestipino A., Feig S. A., Singer J. S., Nonpalpable in situ ductal carcinoma of the breast. Predictors of multicentricity and microinvasion and implications for treatment. Archives of Surgery 1989 124 1 29 32 2-s2.0-0024585768 (Pubitemid 19025898)
19. Chagpar A. B., Martin R. C. G., Hagendoorn L. J., Chao C., McMasters K. M., Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique. American Journal of Surgery 2004 188 4 399 402 2-s2.0-4944237903 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.06.020 (Pubitemid 39330544)
20. Page D. L., Lagios M. D., Fisher E. R., Costantino J., Fisher B., Palekar A. S., Mamounas E., Pathologic analysis of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) B-17 trial: unanswered questions remaining unanswered considering current concepts of ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer 1995 75 6 1219 1227 2-s2.0-0028938932 10.1002/1097-0142(19950315)75:6<1219::AID- CNCR2820750602>3.0.CO;2-X
21. Holmes D. R., Schooler W., Smith R., Oncoplastic approaches to breast conservation. International Journal of Breast Cancer 2011 2011 16 303879 10.4061/2011/303879
22. Guidroz J. A., Larrieux G., Liao J., Sugg S. L., Scott-Conner C. E. H., Weigel R. J., Sampling of secondary margins decreases the need for re-excision after partial mastectomy. Surgery 2011 150 4 802 809 2-s2.0-80054098546 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.064
23. Kobbermann A., Unzeitig A., Xie X. J., Yan J., Euhus D., Peng Y., Sarode V., Moldrem A., Marilyn Leitch A., Andrews V., Stallings C., Rao R., Impact of routine cavity shave margins on breast cancer re-excision rates. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2011 18 5 1349 1355 2-s2.0-79955858151 10.1245/s10434-010- 1420-6
24. Muttalib M., Tisdall M., Scawn R., Shousha S., Cummins R. S., Sinnett H. D., Intra-operative specimen analysis using faxitron microradiography for excision of mammographically suspicious, non-palpable breast lesions. Breast 2004 13 4 307 315 2-s2.0-4444268854 10.1016/j.breast.2004.02.005 (Pubitemid 39172731)
25. Bathla L., Harris A., Davey M., Sharma P., Silva E., High resolution intra-operative two-dimensional specimen mammography and its impact on second operation for re-excision of positive margins at final pathology after breast conservation surgery. American Journal of Surgery 2011 202 4 387 394 2-s2.0-84856375899 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.031
26. Schulz-Wendtland R., Bani M. R., Lux M. P., Meier-Meitinger M., Adamietz B., Wenkel E., Schwab S., Beckmann M. W., Uder M., CMOS technology for intraoperative digital imaging: can the re-excision rate after breast surgery be reduced? Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 2011 71 6 525 529 2-s2.0-79959663226 10.1055/s-0030-1271173
27. Klimberg V. S., Westbrook K. C., Korourian S., Use of touch preps for diagnosis and evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology 1998 5 3 220 226 2-s2.0-0031810827 10.1007/BF02303776 (Pubitemid 28249311)
28. Valdes E. K., Boolbol S. K., Cohen J. M., Feldman S. M., Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy? Annals of Surgical Oncology 2007 14 3 1045 1050 2-s2.0-33847368964 10.1245/s10434-006-9263-x (Pubitemid 46348828)
29. Osborn J. B., Keeney G. L., Jakub J. W., Degnim A. C., Boughey J. C., Cost-effectiveness analysis of routine frozen-section analysis of breast margins compared with reoperation for positive margins. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2011 18 11 3204 3209 2-s2.0-83055172925 10.1245/s10434-011-1956-0
30. Cendán J. C., Coco D., Copeland E. M., Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2005 201 2 194 198 2-s2.0-22244449241 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.03.014 (Pubitemid 40994951)
31. Margenthaler J. A., Gao F., Klimberg V. S., Margin index: a new method for prediction of residual disease after breast-conserving surgery. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2010 17 10 2696 2701 2-s2.0-78049475247 10.1245/s10434-010- 1079-z
32. Morrow M., Harris J. R., Schnitt S. J., Surgical margins in lumpectomy for breast cancer-bigger is not better. New England Journal of Medicine 2012 367 1 79 82 2-s2.0-84863514055 10.1056/NEJMsb1202521