Initial margin status for invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast and subsequent identification of carcinoma in reexcision specimens

Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 134, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 109-114

  Skripenova, Silvia ^a   Layfield, Lester J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; PREVALENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY; TUMOR RECURRENCE;

BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; PREVALENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 75149120661     PISSN: 00039985     EISSN: 15432165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233-1241.
2. Kotwall C, Ranson M, Stiles A, Hamann MS. Relationship between initial margin status for invasive breast cancer and residual carcinoma after re-excision. Am Surg. 2007;73(4):337-343.
3. Newman LA, Washington TA. New trends in breast conservation therapy. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83(4):841-883.
4. Aziz D, Rawlinson E, Narod SA, et al. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Breast J. 2006;12(4):331-337.
5. Mirza NQ, Vlastos G, Meric F, et al. Predictors of locoregional recurrence among patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9(3):256-265.
6. Leong C, Boyages J, Jayasinghe UW, et al. Effect of margins on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conservation therapy for lymph nodenegative breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2004;100(9):1823-1832. (Pubitemid 38529559)
7. Swanson GP, Rynearson K, Symmonds R. Significance of margins of excision on breast cancer recurrence. Am J Clin Oncol. 2002;25(5):438-441.
8. Cao D, Lin C, Woo SH, Vang R, Tsangaris TN, Argani P. Separate cavity margin sampling at the time of initial breast lumpectomy significantly reduces the need for reexcisions. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29(12):1625-1632.
9. Gage I, Schnitt SJ, Nixon AJ, et al. Pathologic margin involvement and the risk of recurrence in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Cancer. 1996;78(9):1921-1928.
10. Gwin JL, Eisenberg BL, Hoffman JP, Ottery FD, Boraas M, Solin LJ. Incidence of gross and microscopic carcinoma in specimens from patients with breast cancer after re-excision lumpectomy. Ann Surg. 1993;218(6):729-734.
11. Jardines L, Fowble B, Schultz D, et al. Factors associated with a positive reexcision after excisional biopsy for invasive breast cancer. Surgery. 1995; 118(5):803-809.
12. Kearney TJ, Morrow M. Effect of reexcision on the success of breastconserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 1995;2(4):303-307.
13. Papa MZ, Zippel D, Koller M, Klein E, Chetrit A, Ari GB. Positive margins of breast biopsy: is reexcision always necessary? J Surg Oncol. 1999;70(3):167-171.
14. Scopa CD, Aroukatos P, Tsamandas AC, Aletra C. Evaluation of margin status in lumpectomy specimens and residual breast carcinoma. Breast J. 2006; 12(2):150-153.
15. Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1981;305(1):6-11.
16. Inagi H. Wide excision as a method of breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. J Jpn Surg Oncol. 2002; 103:806-810.
17. Taghian A, Mohiuddin M, Jagsi R, Goldberg S, Ceilley E, Powell S. Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy: results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2005;241(4):629-639.
18. Tartter PI, Kaplan J, Bleiweiss I, et al. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2000;179(2):81-85.
19. Cellini C, Hollenbeck ST, Christos P, et al. Factors associated with residual breast cancer after re-excision for close or positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11(10):915-920.
20. Luu HH, Otis CN, Reed WP Jr, Garb JL, Frank JL. The unsatisfactory margin in breast cancer surgery. Am J Surg. 1999;178(5):362-366.
21. Macmillan RD, Purushotham AD, Mallon E, Ramsay G, George WD. Breast-conserving surgery and tumour bed positivity in patients with breast cancer. Br J Surg. 1994;81(1):56-58.
22. Miller AR, Brandao G, Prihoda TJ, Hill C, Cruz AB Jr, Yeh IT. Positive margins following surgical resection of breast carcinoma: analysis of pathologic correlates. J Surg Oncol. 2004;86(3):134-140.
23. Mokbel K, Ahmed M, Nash A, Sacks N. Re-excision operations in nonpalpable breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 1995;58(4):225-8; discussion 229-232.
24. Ooi CW, Serpell JW, Rodger A. Tumour involvement of the re-excision specimen following clear local excision of breast cancer with positive margins. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(12):979-982.
25. Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Khettry U, et al. Pathologic findings on re-excision of the primary site in breast cancer patients considered for treatment by primary radiation therapy. Cancer. 1987;59(4):675-681.
26. Solin LJ, Fowble B, Martz K, Pajak TF, Goodman RL. Results of re-excisional biopsy of the primary tumor in preparation for definitive irradiation of patients with early stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1986;12(5):721-725.
27. Wazer DE, Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Schmid CH, et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;38(2):291-299.