Male-specific DNA markers provide genetic evidence of an XY chromosome system, a recombination arrest and allow the tracing of paternal lineages in date palm

New Phytologist

Volumn 197, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 409-415

  Cherif, Emira ^a,b   Zehdi, Salwa ^b   Castillo, Karina ^a   Chabrillange, Nathalie ^a   Abdoulkader, Sabira ^c   Pintaud, Jean Christophe ^a   Santoni, Sylvain ^d   Salhi Hannachi, Amel ^b   Glémin, Sylvain ^e   Aberlenc Bertossi, Frédérique ^a  

^a INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE POUR LE DÉVELOPPEMENT   (France)

^b FACULTÉ DES SCIENCES DE TUNIS   (Tunisia)

^c CERD   (Djibouti)

^d UMR AGAP   (France)

^e INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

Author keywords

Dioecy; Microsatellite markers; Phoenix dactylifera (date palm); Sex chromosomes; Sex determination; Suppression of recombination

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA; PLANT DNA;

ANCESTRY; CHROMOSOME; DIOECY; GENETIC MARKER; GENOME; GENOTYPE; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; MONOCOTYLEDON; PHYLOGENETICS; RECOMBINATION; SEX DETERMINATION;

ALLELE; ARECACEAE; ARTICLE; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HAPLOTYPE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PLANT CHROMOSOME;

ALLELES; ARECACEAE; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; DNA, PLANT; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC LOCI; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC VARIATION; HAPLOTYPES; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PHYLOGENY; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA; PHOENIX DACTYLIFERA;

EID: 84871268599     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12069     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. AbdAlla MM, Abd El-Kawy AM. 2010. Karyotype analysis for date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L) compared with tissue culture derived plants. New York Science Journal 3: 165-170.
2. Al-Dous EK, George B, Al-Mahmoud ME, Al-Jaber MY, Wang H, Salameh YM, Al-Azwani EK, Chaluvadi S, Pontaroli AC, DeBarry J et al. 2011. De novo genome sequencing and comparative genomics of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera). Nature Biotechnology 29: 521-527.
3. Al-Mahmoud ME, Al-Dous EK, Al-Azwani EK, Malek JA. 2012. DNA-based assays to distinguish date palm (Arecaceae) gender. American Journal of Botany. 99: 7-10.
4. Bekheet SA, Hanafy MS. 2011. Towards sex determination of date palm. Date Palm Biotechnology. New York, NY, USA: Springer.
5. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F. 2004. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Montpellier, France: Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5171, Université de Montpellier II.
6. Billotte N, Marseillac N, Brottier P, Noyer JL, Jacquemoud-Collet JP, Moreau C, Couvreur T, Chevallier MH, Pintaud JC, Risterucci AM. 2004. Nuclear microsatellite markers for the date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.): characterization and utility across the genus Phoenix and in other palm genera. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 256-258.
7. Bull JJ. 1983. Evolution of sex determining mechanisms. San Francisco, CA, USA: Benjamin/Cummings Pub. Co., Inc..
8. Charlesworth B. 1991.Theevolution of sex chromosomes. Science251: 1030-1033.
9. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. The American Naturalist 112: 975-997.
10. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. 2000. The degeneration of Y chromosomes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 355: 1563-1572.
11. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B, Marais G. 2005. Steps in the evolution of heteromorphic sex chromosomes. Heredity 95: 118-128.
12. Couvreur TLP, Forest F, Baker WJ. 2011. Origin and global diversification patterns of tropical rain forests: inferences from a complete genus-level phylogeny of palms. BMC Biology 9: 1-12.
13. Daher A, Adam H, Chabrillange N, Collin M, Mohamed N, Tregear JW, Aberlenc-Bertossi F. 2010. Cell cycle arrest characterizes the transition from a bisexual floral bud to a unisexual flower in Phoenix dactylifera. Annals of Botany 106: 255-266.
14. Dransfield J, Uhl NW, Asmussen CB, Baker WJ, Harley MM, Lewis CE. 2008. Genera Palmarum: the evolution and classification of palms. Kew, UK: Kew Publishing.
15. Excoffier L, Slatkin M. 1995. Maximum-likelihood estimation of molecular haplotype frequencies in a diploid population. Molecular Biology and Evolution 12: 921-927.
16. Gordo I, Charlesworth B. 2001. Genetic linkage and molecular evolution. Current Biology 11: 684-686.
17. Guo SW, Thompson EA. 1992. Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48: 361-372.
18. Haasl RJ, Payseur BA. 2010. The number of alleles at a microsatellite defines the allele frequency spectrum and facilitates fast accurate estimation of theta. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27: 2702-2715.
19. Hughes JF, Rozen S. 2012. Genomics and genetics of human and primate Y chromosomes. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 13: 3.1-3.26.
20. Kimura M, Ohta T. 1978. Stepwise mutation model and distribution of allelic frequencies in a finite population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 75: 2868-2872.
21. Lemaitre C, Braga MDV, Gautier C, Sagot MF, Tannier E, Marais GAB. 2009. Footprints of inversions at present and past pseudoautosomal boundaries in human sex chromosomes. Genome Biology and Evolution 1: 56-66.
22. Ogg J. 2004. Status of divisions of the international geologic time scale. Lethaia 37: 183-199.
23. Parasnis AS, Ramakrishna W, Chowdari KV, Gupta VS, Ranjekar PK. 1999. Microsatellite (GATA)n reveals sex-specific differences in Papaya. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 99: 1047-1052.
24. Peakall R, Smouse PE. 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288-295.
25. Raymond M, Rousset F. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248-249.
26. Renner SS, Ricklefs RE. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. American Journal of Botany 82: 596-606.
27. Robertson A, Hill WG. 1984. Deviations from Hardy-Weinberg proportions: sampling variances and use in estimation of inbreeding coefficients. Genetics 107: 703-718.
28. Ross JA, Peichel CL. 2008. Molecular cytogenetic evidence of rearrangements on the Y chromosome of the threespine stickleback fish. Genetics 179: 2173-2182.
29. Rousset F. 2008. Genepop'007: a complete reimplementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 103-106.
30. Saadi M. 1990. Amélioration génétique du palmier dattier: Critéres de sélection, techniques et résultats. Options Mediterraneennes 11: 133-134.
31. Segawa M, Kishi S, Tatuno S. 1971. Sex chromosomes of Cycas revoluta. Japanese Journal of Genetics 46: 33-39.
32. Siljak-Yakovlev S, Cerbah M, Sarr A, Benmalek S, Bounaga N, Coba De La Pena T, Brown S. 1996. Chromosomal sex determination and heterochromatin structure in date palm. Sexual Plant Reproduction 9: 127-132.
33. Slatkin M. 1995. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139: 457-462.
34. Spada A, Caporali E, Marziani G, Portaluppi P, Restivo FM, Tassi F, Falavigna A. 1998.Agenetic map of Asparagus officinalis based on integrated RFLP,RAPDand AFLP molecular markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 97: 1083-1089.
35. Tengberg M. 2003. Research into the origins of date palm domestication. In: The date palm: from traditional resource to Green Wealth. Abu Dhabi UEA: The Emirates Center for Strategic Studies and Research, 51-62.
36. Terauchi R, Kahl G. 1999. Mapping of the Dioscorea tokoro genome: AFLP markers linked to sex. Genome 42: 752-762.
37. Weiblen GD, Oyama RK, Donoghue MJ. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of dioecy in monocotyledons. American Naturalist 155: 46-58.
38. Weir BS, Cockerham CC. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370.
39. Westergaard M. 1958. The mechanism of sex determination in dioecious flowering plants. Advances in Genetics 9: 217-281.