The Effect of Inequality Frames on Support for Redistributive Tax Policies

Psychological Science

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1467-1469

  Chow, Rosalind M ^a   Galak, Jeff ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871254087     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797612450035     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bartels L. M.Homer gets a tax cut: Inequality and public policy in the American mind.Perspectives on Politics. 2005;3:15-31.
2. Bartels L. M.Unequal democracy: The political economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2008:.
3. Feather N. T.Protestant ethic, conservatism, and values.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1984;46:1132-1141.
4. Jost J. T.,Blount S.,Pfeffer J.,Hunydady G.Fair market ideology: Its cognitive-motivational underpinnings.Research in Organizational Behavior. 2003;25:53-91.
5. Jost J. T.,Glaser J.,Kruglanski A. W.,Sulloway F. J.Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.Psychological Bulletin. 2003;129:339-375.
6. Lowery B. S.,Chow R. M.,Knowles E. D.,Unzueta M. M.Paying for positive group esteem: How inequity frames affect Whites' responses to redistributive policies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2012;102:323-336.
7. Lowery B. S.,Chow R. M.,Randall-Crosby J.Taking from those that have more and giving to those that have less: How inequity frames affect corrections for inequity.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2009;45:375-378.
8. Lowery B. S.,Wout D.When inequality matters: The effect of inequality frames on academic engagement.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2010;98:956-966.
9. Mishel L.,Bernstein J.,Boushey H.The state of working America 2002/2003. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2003:.