Patient-level hospital costs and length of stay after conventional versus minimally invasive total hip replacement: A propensity-matched analysis

Value in Health

Volumn 15, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 999-1004

  Röttger, Julia ^a   Scheller Kreinsen, David ^a   Busse, Reinhard ^a  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

economics; hip arthroplasty; hospital; minimally invasive

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONVENTIONAL TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HOSPITAL COST; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; COMORBIDITY; FEMALE; GERMANY; HOSPITAL COSTS; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 84871252477     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. I.D. Learmonth, C. Young, and C. Rorabeck The operation of the century: total hip replacement Lancet 370 2007 1508 1519 (Pubitemid 47625538)
2. S.M. Kurtz, K.L. Ong, and J. Schmier Primary and revision arthroplasty surgery caseloads in the United States from 1990 to 2004 J Arthroplasty 24 2009 195 203
3. O. Ethgen, O. Bruyère, and F. Richy Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 2004 963 974 (Pubitemid 38619796)
4. Federal Statistical Office Die 50 häufigsten Operationen der vollstationären Patientinnen und Patienten in Krankenhäusern http://www.gbe-bund.de/oowa921-install/servlet/oowa/aw92/WS0100/-XWD-PROC? -XWD-2/2/xs-standard-neu/F.IND666 2010 Accessed July 2, 2011
5. D.J. Culliford, J. Maskell, and D.J. Beard Temporal trends in hip and knee replacement in the United Kingdom 1991 to 2006 J Bone Joint Surg Br 92B 2010 130 135
6. S. Kurtz, K. Ong, and E. Lau Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 J Bone Joint Surg Am 89A 2007 780 785 (Pubitemid 46564282)
7. S.M. Kurtz, E. Lau, and K. Ong Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030 Clin Orthop 467 2009 2606 2612
8. L. Pulido, J. Parvizi, and M. Macgibeny In hospital complications after total joint arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 23 2008 139 145
9. T.P. Sculco Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative J Arthroplasty 19 2004 78 80 (Pubitemid 38746722)
10. R. de Verteuil, M. Imamura, and S. Zhu A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and economic modelling of minimal incision total hip replacement approaches in the management of arthritic disease of the hip Health Technol Assess 12 2008 1 244
11. M. Pospischill, A. Kranzl, B. Attwenger, and K. Knahr Minimally invasive compared with traditional transgluteal approach for total hip arthroplasty: a comparative gait analysis J Bone Joint Surg Am 92 2010 328 337
12. L.D. Dorr, A.V. Maheshwari, and W.T. Long Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, blinded study J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 2007 1153 1160 (Pubitemid 46897984)
13. J. Goosen, B. Kollen, and R. Castelein Minimally invasive versus classic procedures in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized controlled trial Clin Orthop 469 2011 200 208
14. L. Ogonda, R. Wilson, and P. Archbold A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 2005 701 710 (Pubitemid 40489343)
15. A.E. Pour, J. Parvizi, and P.F. Sharkey Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty: what role does patient preconditioning play? J Bone Joint Surg Am 89A 2007 1920 1927 (Pubitemid 350195021)
16. E. Sendtner, D. Boluki, and J. Grifka Current state of doing minimal invasive total hip replacement in Germany, the use of new implants and navigation - results of a nation-wide survey Z Orthop Unfall 145 2007 297 302
17. A. Mahmood, M.S. Zafar, and I. Majid Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty: a quantitative review of the literature Br Med Bull 84 2007 37 48
18. T. Cheng, J. Feng, T. Liu, and X. Zhang Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review Int Orthop 33 2009 1473 1481
19. T. Smith, V. Blake, and C. Hing Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes Int Orthop 35 2011 173 184
20. P.J. Duwelius, H.S. Moller, and R.L. Burkhart The economic impact of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 26 2011 883 885
21. R.B. D'Agostino Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group Stat Med 17 1998 2265 2281
22. B. Motheral, J. Brooks, and M.A. Clark A checklist for retrospective database studies-report of the ISPOR Task Force on Retrospective Databases Value Health 6 2003 90 97 (Pubitemid 36403125)
23. H.T. Sorensen, S. Sabroe, and J. Olsen A framework for evaluation of secondary data sources for epidemiological research Int J Epidemiol 25 1996 435 442 (Pubitemid 26137126)
24. M. McKee, A. Britton, and N. Black Methods in health services research: interpreting the evidence: choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies BMJ 319 1999 312 315 (Pubitemid 29353952)
25. D.B. Rubin Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores Ann Intern Med 127 1997 757 763 (Pubitemid 27446562)
26. P.R. Rosenbaum, and D.B. Rubin The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects Biometrika 70 1983 41 55
27. R. Cookson, and M. Laudicella Do the poor cost much more? The relationship between small area income deprivation and length of stay for elective hip replacement in the English NHS from 2001 to 2008 Soc Sci Med 72 2011 173 184
28. G.F. Dall, N.E. Ohly, J.A. Ballantyne, and I.J. Brenkel The influence of pre-operative factors on the length of in-patient stay following primary total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a multivariate analysis of 2302 patients J Bone Joint Surg Br 91B 2009 434 440
29. J. Foote, K. Panchoo, P. Blair, and G. Bannister Length of stay following primary total hip replacement Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91 2009 500 504
30. D.E. Fry, M. Pine, B.L. Jones, and R.J. Meimban Adverse outcomes in surgery: redefinition of postoperative complications Am J Surg 197 2009 479 484
31. M. Müller, S. Tohtz, and M. Dewey Muskeltrauma in der primären Hüftendoprothetik unter Berücksichtigung von Alter und BMI sowie in Abhängigkeit vom Operativen Zugangsweg Orthopäde 40 2011 217 223
32. K. Oinuma, C. Eingartner, Y. Saito, and H. Shiratsuchi Total hip arthroplasty by a minimally invasive, direct anterior approach Oper Orthop Traumatol 19 2007 310 326 (Pubitemid 47351433)
33. O.S. Azodi, R. Bellocco, K. Eriksson, and J. Adami The impact of tobacco use and body mass index on the length of stay in hospital and the risk of post-operative complications among patients undergoing total hip replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br 88B 2006 1316 1320 (Pubitemid 44613146)
34. A.M. Epstein, J.L. Read, and M. Hoefer The relation of body weight to length of stay and charges for hospital services for patients undergoing elective surgery: a study of two procedures Am J Public Health 77 1987 993 997 (Pubitemid 17126608)
35. G.F. Chimento, V. Pavone, and N. Sharrock Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study J Arthroplasty 20 2005 139 144 (Pubitemid 40342699)
36. A.J. Rana, R. Iorio, and W.L. Healy Hospital economics of primary THA decreasing reimbursement and increasing cost, 1990 to 2008 Clin Orthop 469 2011 355 361
37. A.N. Shah, T.P. Vail, D. Taylor, and R. Pietrobon Comorbid illness affects hospital costs related to hip arthroplasty: quantification of health status and implications for fair reimbursement and surgeon comparisons J Arthroplasty 19 2004 700 705 (Pubitemid 39179777)
38. B. Arpino, and F. Mealli The specification of the propensity score in multilevel observational studies Comput Stat Data Anal 55 2011 1770 1780
39. P.C. Austin Some methods of propensity-score matching had superior performance to others: results of an empirical investigation and Monte Carlo simulations Biometr J 51 2009 171 184
40. P.C. Austin Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples Stat Med 28 2009 3083 3107
41. S.T. Normand, M.B. Landrum, and E. Guadagnoli Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores J Clin Epidemiol 54 2001 387 398 (Pubitemid 32303462)
42. T. Stargardt Health service costs in Europe: cost and reimbursement of primary hip replacement in nine countries Health Econ 17 Suppl. 2008 S9 S20 (Pubitemid 351227988)
43. P. Yates, S. Serjeant, G. Rushforth, and R. Middleton The relative cost of cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasties J Arthroplasty 21 2006 102 105 (Pubitemid 43162993)
44. J.D. Sams, J.C. Milbrandt, and J.M. Froelich Hospital outcome after emergent vs elective revision total hip arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 25 2010 826 828
45. M.E. Charlson, P. Pompei, K.L. Ales, and C.R. MacKenzie A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation J Chronic Dis 40 1987 373 383 (Pubitemid 17055592)
46. H. Quan, V. Sundararajan, and P. Halfon Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data Med Care 43 2005 1130 1139 (Pubitemid 41587600)
47. P.C. Austin Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review and suggestions for improvement J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 134 2007 1128 1135
48. P.C. Austin A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003 Stat Med 27 2008 2037 2049 (Pubitemid 351772300)