Comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging, guided prostate biopsy and digital rectal examination in the preoperative anatomical localization of prostate cancer

Journal of Urology

Volumn 174, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 2158-2163

  Mullerad, Michael ^a   Hricak, Hedvig ^a   Kuroiwa, Kentaro ^a   Pucar, Darko ^a   Chen, Hui Ni ^a   Kattan, Michael W ^a   Scardino, Peter T ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate; Prostatic neoplasms

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; ENDORECTAL NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SEMINAL VESICLE; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; TREATMENT PLANNING; TUMOR LOCALIZATION;

EID: 27744593527     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000181224.95276.82     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bill-Axelson, A., Holmberg, L., Ruutu, M., Haggman, M., Andersson, S. O., Bratell S. et al: Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med, 352: 1977, 2005
2. Han, M. and Partin A. W.: Nomograms for clinically localized prostate cancer. Part I: radical prostatectomy. Semin Urol Oncol, 20: 123, 2002
3. Shinohara, K., Wheeler, T. M. and Scardino, P. T.: The appearance of prostate cancer on transrectal ultrasonography: correlation of imaging and pathological examinations. J Urol, 142: 76, 1989
4. Rifkin, M. D., Zerhouni, E. A., Gatsonis, C. A., Quint, L. E., Paushter, D. M., Epstein, J. I. et al: Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in staging early prostate cancer. Results of a multi-institutional cooperative trial. N Engl J Med, 323: 621, 1990
5. Bernstein, M. R., Cangiano, T., D'Amico, A., Chittams, J., Hardy, C., Whittington, R. D. et al: Endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging and clinicopathologic findings in Tie adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Urol Oncol, 5: 104, 2000
6. Cornud, F., Flam, T., Chauveinc, L., Hamida, K., Chretien, Y., Vieillefond, A. et al: Extraprostatic spread of clinically localized prostate cancer: factors predictive of pT3 tumor and of positive endorectal MR imaging examination results. Radiology, 224: 203, 2002
7. Yu, K. K., Hricak, H., Alagappan, R. Chernoff, D. M., Bacchetti, P. and Zaloudek, C. J.: Detection of extracapsular extension of prostate carcinoma with endorectal and phased-array coil MR imaging: multivariate feature analysis. Radiology, 202: 697, 1997
8. Wefer, A. E., Hricak, H., Vigneron, D. B., Coakley, F. V., Lu, Y., Wefer, J. et al: Sextant localization of prostate cancer: comparison of sextant biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology. J Urol, 164: 400, 2000
9. Yu, K. K., Scheidler, J., Hricak, H., Vigneron, D. B., Zaloudek, C. J., Males, R. G. et al: Prostate cancer: prediction of extracapsular extension with endorectal MR imaging and three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology, 213: 481, 1999
10. Mullerad, M., Hricak, H., Wang, L., Chen, H. N., Kattan, M. W. and Scardino, P. T.: Prostate cancer: detection of extracapsular extension by genitourinary and general body radiologists at MR imaging. Radiology, 232: 140, 2004
11. Yossepowitch, O., Sircar, K., Scardino, P. T., Ohori, M., Kattan, M. W., Wheeler, T. M. et al: Bladder neck involvement in pathological stage pT4 radical prostatectomy specimens is not an independent prognostic factor. J Urol, 168: 2011, 2002
12. Greene, D. R., Egawa, S., Neerhut, G., Flanagan, W., Wheeler, T. M. and Scardino, P. T.: The distribution of residual cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens in stage A prostate cancer. J Urol, 145: 324, 1991
13. Obek, C., Louis, P., Civantos, F. and Soloway, M. S.: Comparison of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the radical prostatectomy specimen. J Urol, 161: 494, 1999
14. Salomon, L., Colombel, M., Patard, J. J., Lefrere-Belda, M. A., Bellot, J., Chopin, D. et al: Value of ultrasound-guided systematic sextant biopsies in prostate tumor mapping. Eur Urol, 35: 289, 1999
15. Frauscher, F., Klauser, A. and Halpern, E. J.: Advances in ultrasound for the detection of prostate cancer. Ultrasound Q, 18: 135, 2002
16. Pelzer, A., Bektic, J., Berger, A. P., Pallwein, L, Halpern, E. J., Horninger, W. et al: Prostate cancer detection in men with prostate specific antigen 4 to 10 ng/ml using a combined approach of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted and systematic biopsy. J Urol, 173: 1926, 2005
17. Ohori, M., Kattan, M. W., Koh, H., Maru, N., Slawin, K. M., Shariat, S. et al: Predicting the presence and side of extracapsular extension: a nomogram for staging prostate cancer. J Urol, 171: 1844, 2004
18. Hricak, H., Wang, L., Wei, D. C., Coakley, F. V., Akin, O., Reuter, V. E. et al: The role of preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision regarding whether to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer, 100: 2655, 2004
19. Epstein, J. I., Walsh, P. C., Carmichael, M. and Brendler, C. B.: Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. JAMA, 271: 368, 1994
20. Ohori, M., Wheeler, T. M., Dunn, J. K., Stamey, T. A. and Scardino, P. T.: The pathological features and prognosis of prostate cancer detectable with current diagnostic tests. J Urol, 152: 1714, 1994